Saturday, September 25, 2010

Nerdy girls are still better off than guys

Look at these 'ronery girl' comics. Here's a good example.
Haven't you noticed in nearly all of these examples, the 'ronery girl' is infatuated with some pale, skinny 'nerd' - And then, mysteriously, some buxom, popular blonde comes along for whatever reason and starts hitting on the nerd, trying to steal him away from the nerd girl.
This doesn't make ANY f**king sense, yet it's the same premise all ronery girl comics are based on. Why would some cheerleader-like blonde suddenly start hitting on a pale skinny nerd?
The reality is of course, most females are being disingenuous - They weren't hitting on a nerd, they were hitting on some hipster/indief** 'hottie'. Because they're shallow.
Bitches and wh**res.




I bet the roreny girl is actually a large hambeast, obviously not depicted in your illustration.

Brotip: It's a misconception. Nerdy girl never fawn over pale, skinny nerds. They drool over a man who is in the upper 10% when it comes to look (if she isn't busy shlicking to Twilight). And of course this guy rather drools over some hot blonde cheerleader bimbo with huge boobs. So they claim ronery because those guys don't want them in their harem.

PROTIP: The girl in question is, guaranteed, either:
- Lying/exaggerating
- Socially insufferable (otaku/"lolrandum"/deviant art reject/etc)
- Fat
- Ugly
- Fat and ugly
- A man

Nerd girls are nerd girls because they don't have any cool friends, are crazy or are fat and/or ugly. Secretly, they want "alpha males" (like anonymous calles them) just like every other girl. If they can't get any, they settle with pale, skinny nerds.

I'd get away from them if they played Halo too.
F**KING CASUALS

There are a lot of bitches and wh**res threads today.
And I like it.
Beaches and shores guys, don't forget that.

I love the way she acts like a complete wh**re ('lets get drunk and f**k'), yet acts like the other girl is the wh**re.
DO YOU HEAR ME femaleS?
YOU ARE WH**RES!

>Go for top 5% of guys
>Wonder why he f**ks you and dumps you/isn't interested immediately
Dumb females, here's another pic.

Look at these 'ronery girl' comics. Here's a good example.
Haven't you noticed in nearly all of these examples, the 'ronery girl' is infatuated with some pale, skinny 'nerd' - And then, mysteriously, some buxom, popular blonde comes along for whatever reason and starts hitting on the nerd, trying to steal him away from the nerd girl.
This doesn't make ANY f**king sense, yet it's the same premise all ronery girl comics are based on. Why would some cheerleader-like blonde suddenly start hitting on a pale skinny nerd?
The reality is of course, most females are being disingenuous - They weren't hitting on a nerd, they were hitting on some hipster/indief** 'hottie'. Because they're shallow.
Bitches and wh**res.

>Time for sad dildo sex
This made me lol hard.

I've seen OP's comic countless times, and it always aggravates me. Assuming it's based on actual events, if I was the guy in the story the ONLY way that would happen is if she was either annoying, ugly, or both. In which case the story really isn't as sad/unjust as she wants you to think.

This is just patheticly derivative of all the male ronery comics, threads, copypasta etc on here that is at least a heartfelt expression of genuine pain and feeling. This is just some dumb wh**re playing at "me too", while fundamentally missing the point, and failing miserably at making it interesting or entertaining or thought-provoking anyway.
In any case, no of course this didn't happen. And if it did, it was only because she is record-breakingly ugly and probably smells. And why exactly is a night of meaningless sex with her somehow morally better than a night of meaningless sex with a hotter broad who doesn't look like the clingy, psycho type?

I've seen OP's comic countless times, and it always aggravates me. Assuming it's based on actual events, if I was the guy in the story the ONLY way that would happen is if she was either annoying, ugly, or both. In which case the story really isn't as sad/unjust as she wants you to think.

Me again. I guess another way that could have happened if I was the guy is if she was being to subtle. Remember females: Most guys are clueless, I'll be the first to admit. If you feel he's ignoring your clues, it's because he doesn't know they're clues. Don't be afraid to be blunt.

I'd take the hot chick over the boring nerd girl anyway. If the nerd girl wasn't boring or ugly he wouldn't have left her for the hot one

They're grasping at straws. Ronery girl comics are like Christians trying justify a literal interpretation of genisis.

It's just me-tooism, trying to fit in to the dominant trend. Only it doesn't work, as women don't feel loneliness.

I'd get away from them if they played Halo too.
F**KING CASUALS

>implying that one who plays halo only ever plays halo and no other game.
fa**ot

Girls will follow ANY trend or "style" if it means they get their precious attention.
If theres ONE thing all girls want it's attention. I don't see why people are going "DURR WUT DO WOMEN WANT?"
They love attention, and the things that come with attention (money, jewelry etc...).
That said, girls will associate themselves in the "nerd" (lol) scene if it means they'll get attention. Just look at the comic-con wh**res and the G4 bitches...

POST MOAR... if there is any
these bring me great lulz
stitches and doors, boys, ditches and floors...


>implying that one who plays halo only ever plays halo and no other game.
fa**ot

>implying he does
lol fa**ot

Girls will follow ANY trend or "style" if it means they get their precious attention.
If theres ONE thing all girls want it's attention. I don't see why people are going "DURR WUT DO WOMEN WANT?"
They love attention, and the things that come with attention (money, jewelry etc...).
That said, girls will associate themselves in the "nerd" (lol) scene if it means they'll get attention. Just look at the comic-con wh**res and the G4 bitches...

If you say attention one more time, I am gonna punch you in the face. Right in the face.

I know a girl like that in OP's pic.
Sh*t's scary. And she's a rather obscene hambeast. Quote for quote, she uses "sad dildo sex" as a phrase : \

Why do men cry about women being wh**res who only want to mate with attractive men, yet they completely ignore less attractive women and go for the most attractive ones themselves? Isn't that kinda hypocritical?

Look at these 'ronery girl' comics. Here's a good example.
Haven't you noticed in nearly all of these examples, the 'ronery girl' is infatuated with some pale, skinny 'nerd' - And then, mysteriously, some buxom, popular blonde comes along for whatever reason and starts hitting on the nerd, trying to steal him away from the nerd girl.
This doesn't make ANY f**king sense, yet it's the same premise all ronery girl comics are based on. Why would some cheerleader-like blonde suddenly start hitting on a pale skinny nerd?
The reality is of course, most females are being disingenuous - They weren't hitting on a nerd, they were hitting on some hipster/indief** 'hottie'. Because they're shallow.
Bitches and wh**res.

and you thought this was worthy of a thread why?

Why do men cry about women being wh**res who only want to mate with attractive men, yet they completely ignore less attractive women and go for the most attractive ones themselves? Isn't that kinda hypocritical?

Don't question it. Just sit back and watch the lonely guys rage about BITCHES AND WH**RES.
I'll get the beer, you get the popcorn.


If you say attention one more time, I am gonna punch you in the face. Right in the face.

tough guy

I'd take the hot chick over the boring nerd girl anyway. If the nerd girl wasn't boring or ugly he wouldn't have left her for the hot one

>I'd totally take the hot girl over the smart one
>F**king bitch took the hot guy over me ALL WOMEN ARE WH**RES
anonymous

Why do men cry about women being wh**res who only want to mate with attractive men, yet they completely ignore less attractive women and go for the most attractive ones themselves? Isn't that kinda hypocritical?

Women are wh**res because more often than not they go for the man who hurts them. They want an alpha male, not a nice guy, and that's f**ked up.


Women are wh**res because more often than not they go for the man who hurts them. They want an alpha male, not a nice guy, and that's f**ked up.

Please explain why the way other women choose their partners has anything to do with me, and especially why it makes me a wh**re.


Women are wh**res because more often than not they go for the man who hurts them. They want an alpha male, not a nice guy, and that's f**ked up.

Yes, but then you look at the OP comic and assert that the woman must be totally disgusting/ugly and is a total wh**re etc. etc. etc.
You all rant with fiery, impotent rage about how women are shallow wh**res and then reject women that aren't the best looking but are actually good people. Damaged goods, all of you.


Women are wh**res because more often than not they go for the man who hurts them. They want an alpha male, not a nice guy, and that's f**ked up.

And men are different, how exactly? Don't they go for attractive women themselves? Don't they also go for gold diggers and whatnot?


Women are wh**res because more often than not they go for the man who hurts them. They want an alpha male, not a nice guy, and that's f**ked up.

You didn't actually refute the point made in the post you replied to. Try again, sweetie.


And men are different, how exactly? Don't they go for attractive women themselves? Don't they also go for gold diggers and whatnot?

>men
>go for golddiggers
Uhhh...no?

I've had nerdy chicks be friendly with me and make offhanded comments like, '7 years age difference, that's not really too much' I figured they were just being friendly though. They were solid 5-6s in the mainstream view, but very attractive to me. It would really pain me if they were actually looking at me romantically.
I wasn't ignoring them to pursue someone hotter, I just thought I didn't have a chance and didn't want to creep them out.


>men
>go for golddiggers
Uhhh...no?

Trophy wives? In MY society?
It's more likely than you think.


Trophy wives? In MY society?
It's more likely than you think.

That's different to going for a golddigger.
A golddigger will be sly about it, the man will have no idea she's trying to get his money.
With a trophy wife the man knows beforehand, and it's a fair and honest transaction. Completely incomparable to a woman going for an abusive prick.


Yes, but then you look at the OP comic and assert that the woman must be totally disgusting/ugly and is a total wh**re etc. etc. etc.
You all rant with fiery, impotent rage about how women are shallow wh**res and then reject women that aren't the best looking but are actually good people. Damaged goods, all of you.

>Yes, but then you look at the OP comic and assert that the woman must be totally disgusting/ugly and is a total wh**re etc. etc. etc.
Then explain to me what else it could be, assuming the events actually took place.
God, it's like talking to a 2-year-old.


>Yes, but then you look at the OP comic and assert that the woman must be totally disgusting/ugly and is a total wh**re etc. etc. etc.
Then explain to me what else it could be, assuming the events actually took place.
God, it's like talking to a 2-year-old.

Think of a situation where a girl you liked rejected you for a cuter, dumber guy. That's what it could've been.
Why is that so implausible?

Jesus f**k you guys really dont like women do you? Is it that hard to believe that women also suffer disappointments, rejection, and loneliness?
You have to admit you guys are pretty f**king oblivious. If you really search your heart right now you'll realize that you have a casual "nerdy" friend who is a girl who is pining away for you as fap to 90 pounds of silicone and hair bleach.


Think of a situation where a girl you liked rejected you for a cuter, dumber guy. That's what it could've been.
Why is that so implausible?

>Think of a situation where a girl you liked rejected you for a cuter guy
>Implying I'm less attractive than said guy
>ie, EXACTLY THE SAME THING WE'RE SAYING ABOUT THE GIRL
Do you even read what you type?

Maybe you guys would have more luck with women if you weren't so racist against them. Nobody likes a racist.

Jesus f**k you guys really dont like women do you? Is it that hard to believe that women also suffer disappointments, rejection, and loneliness?
You have to admit you guys are pretty f**king oblivious. If you really search your heart right now you'll realize that you have a casual "nerdy" friend who is a girl who is pining away for you as fap to 90 pounds of silicone and hair bleach.

I don't think they do have anyone pining for them, actually.
They're too broken.


And men are different, how exactly? Don't they go for attractive women themselves? Don't they also go for gold diggers and whatnot?

The difference is that men don't claim to want otherwise.


>Think of a situation where a girl you liked rejected you for a cuter guy
>Implying I'm less attractive than said guy
>ie, EXACTLY THE SAME THING WE'RE SAYING ABOUT THE GIRL
Do you even read what you type?

You can be less attractive than somebody without being ugly. It's not exactly binary.
My point is that guys choose girls on the basis of appearance and the prospect of getting laid, which means that there are girls that wind up in the same situation as you.


The difference is that men don't claim to want otherwise.

So if men are up front about it, does that make it okay?
Are you saying women should actually be unashamed about the manipulation and other sh*t of which you accuse them?


So if men are up front about it, does that make it okay?
Are you saying women should actually be unashamed about the manipulation and other sh*t of which you accuse them?

>So if men are up front about it, does that make it okay?
THAT'S WHAT THE ENTIRE THREAD IS ABOUT, YOU MORON.
WE'RE PISSED THAT WOMEN LIE ALL THE F**KING TIME.

Agree with OP, and take it further into the realm of teen movies.
It's always some nerdy boy who wants to get the cheerleader but who ends up settling for the nice girl.
This never f**king happens. The writers are either successful anyhow with no experience in being a reject, or are wishful thinking.
What happens is that in all cases the unhappy girl/geek continues to be unhappy.

You know what's f**king hillarious about all this?
When it comes to males, women don't have to pick between "hot and smart" because men naturally embody that trait with little to no effort at all ( goto /fit/ for proof bitches)
The only thing a woman can base a man on are laughable at best (money, social status, etc.), things attained easily by men. And even then, it's only an issue of how much bullsh*t you want to put up with to attain the petty material status items that will net you the woman you desire.
Nevermind the fact that a modern woman's value set is PURELY Freudian in nature.


You can be less attractive than somebody without being ugly. It's not exactly binary.
My point is that guys choose girls on the basis of appearance and the prospect of getting laid, which means that there are girls that wind up in the same situation as you.

Look at the comic again because that's what we're discussing. Your problem was we're assuming the girl was ugly.
She was offering sex, while the "prettier" girl was berating the guy and demanding money. Assuming little has been exaggerated, I can tell you that there is no way in hell I would ever choose the prettier girl. I just wouldn't. How the f**k does picking the hot girl get me anywhere when I'm being offered the promise of sex from the other one?
Unless she's undesirable in either the looks department or she's annoying.
We're trying to make sense of a situation that makes none. Stop acting like the author of this comic was some poor, defenseless girl next door and that the guy was the real villain. She's not at fault either, but she's also pretty f**king retarded if she either believes that's how the world works or that we'll believe her lies.


>So if men are up front about it, does that make it okay?
THAT'S WHAT THE ENTIRE THREAD IS ABOUT, YOU MORON.
WE'RE PISSED THAT WOMEN LIE ALL THE F**KING TIME.

So women should all go for the alpha male guys and be okay with it. They shouldn't feel ashamed for wanting the guy with the nice biceps or the fat wallet (and fat c**k to accompany it).
You'll still be rejected, but at least in this case women won't need to be insecure about what they really want. What an excellent world that would be.

Maybe you guys would have more luck with women if you weren't so racist against them. Nobody likes a racist.

Wrong. Most girls I've met don't like blacks as much as me deep down and certainly wouldn't date one. But those were normal girls, don't know about nerdy ones.

You know what's f**king hillarious about all this?
When it comes to males, women don't have to pick between "hot and smart" because men naturally embody that trait with little to no effort at all ( goto /fit/ for proof bitches)
The only thing a woman can base a man on are laughable at best (money, social status, etc.), things attained easily by men. And even then, it's only an issue of how much bullsh*t you want to put up with to attain the petty material status items that will net you the woman you desire.
Nevermind the fact that a modern woman's value set is PURELY Freudian in nature.

>money, social status
>easily attained by men
what.


Look at the comic again because that's what we're discussing. Your problem was we're assuming the girl was ugly.
She was offering sex, while the "prettier" girl was berating the guy and demanding money. Assuming little has been exaggerated, I can tell you that there is no way in hell I would ever choose the prettier girl. I just wouldn't. How the f**k does picking the hot girl get me anywhere when I'm being offered the promise of sex from the other one?
Unless she's undesirable in either the looks department or she's annoying.
We're trying to make sense of a situation that makes none. Stop acting like the author of this comic was some poor, defenseless girl next door and that the guy was the real villain. She's not at fault either, but she's also pretty f**king retarded if she either believes that's how the world works or that we'll believe her lies.

What if the hotter girl was offering him sex but the author left that out? Is it okay for the guy to go with the hotter one, then?
If so, then women should do the same thing. The end.


So women should all go for the alpha male guys and be okay with it. They shouldn't feel ashamed for wanting the guy with the nice biceps or the fat wallet (and fat c**k to accompany it).
You'll still be rejected, but at least in this case women won't need to be insecure about what they really want. What an excellent world that would be.

AND AT LEAST WE WON'T HAVE RETARDED GIRLS COMPLETELY MAKING SH*T UP WHEN THEY SAY THEY'RE INTO NERDY GUYS WHEN THEY PLAINLY F**KING AREN'T.
WELL DONE, YOU UNDERSTAND THE FIRST POST OF THE THREAD.


>money, social status
>easily attained by men
what.

It's true.
I'm rich and liked by everyone. It's not hard unless you're an aspie.


What if the hotter girl was offering him sex but the author left that out? Is it okay for the guy to go with the hotter one, then?
If so, then women should do the same thing. The end.

Oh, then the author lied to make the reader side with her.
You're right. Women aren't lying wh**res. How silly of me.

You know what's f**king hillarious about all this?
When it comes to males, women don't have to pick between "hot and smart" because men naturally embody that trait with little to no effort at all ( goto /fit/ for proof bitches)
The only thing a woman can base a man on are laughable at best (money, social status, etc.), things attained easily by men. And even then, it's only an issue of how much bullsh*t you want to put up with to attain the petty material status items that will net you the woman you desire.
Nevermind the fact that a modern woman's value set is PURELY Freudian in nature.

Yep working out every day for years while studying like an idiot for some stupid degree in order to get a somewhat decent job one day is no work at all.

Jesus f**k you guys really dont like women do you? Is it that hard to believe that women also suffer disappointments, rejection, and loneliness?
You have to admit you guys are pretty f**king oblivious. If you really search your heart right now you'll realize that you have a casual "nerdy" friend who is a girl who is pining away for you as fap to 90 pounds of silicone and hair bleach.

I wish there was a girl pining away for me.
I would love her and take care of her all I could no matter what she looked like/what she acted like, because she chose ME out of all other guys.
Too bad that'll never happen :(
Basically, you are so very wrong.


AND AT LEAST WE WON'T HAVE RETARDED GIRLS COMPLETELY MAKING SH*T UP WHEN THEY SAY THEY'RE INTO NERDY GUYS WHEN THEY PLAINLY F**KING AREN'T.
WELL DONE, YOU UNDERSTAND THE FIRST POST OF THE THREAD.

And you're not into nerdy girls either. So you'll be perpetually rejected and lonely no matter what. You're okay with that.

Jesus f**k you guys really dont like women do you? Is it that hard to believe that women also suffer disappointments, rejection, and loneliness?
You have to admit you guys are pretty f**king oblivious. If you really search your heart right now you'll realize that you have a casual "nerdy" friend who is a girl who is pining away for you as fap to 90 pounds of silicone and hair bleach.

>If you really search your heart right now you'll realize that you have a casual "nerdy" friend who is a girl who is pining away for you as fap to 90 pounds of silicone and hair bleach.
lol no


Yep working out every day for years while studying like an idiot for some stupid degree in order to get a somewhat decent job one day is no work at all.

No, he's saying in many cases the smart guys are also not very attractive.
And guys have an easier time losing weight and getting toned than women.
So if you're smart but can't get women, work out a bit and you're good.

Jesus f**k you guys really dont like women do you? Is it that hard to believe that women also suffer disappointments, rejection, and loneliness?
You have to admit you guys are pretty f**king oblivious. If you really search your heart right now you'll realize that you have a casual "nerdy" friend who is a girl who is pining away for you as fap to 90 pounds of silicone and hair bleach.

Yeah, but she's ugly as f**k.


And you're not into nerdy girls either. So you'll be perpetually rejected and lonely no matter what. You're okay with that.

No, see, I'm a guy, so what I say I'm attracted to isn't actually bullsh*t? Okay, so, here we go:
I'm into chicks that I can hold an intelligent conversation with.
****F**KING BOMBSHELL****

You know what's f**king hillarious about all this?
When it comes to males, women don't have to pick between "hot and smart" because men naturally embody that trait with little to no effort at all ( goto /fit/ for proof bitches)
The only thing a woman can base a man on are laughable at best (money, social status, etc.), things attained easily by men. And even then, it's only an issue of how much bullsh*t you want to put up with to attain the petty material status items that will net you the woman you desire.
Nevermind the fact that a modern woman's value set is PURELY Freudian in nature.

>implying /fit/ represents the general male population
>implying /fit/ is comprised mostly of drool-worthy sex gods
>implying your only experience seeing other men comes from /fit/
>implying you don't go outside
>implying anonymous


Yep working out every day for years while studying like an idiot for some stupid degree in order to get a somewhat decent job one day is no work at all.


Yep working out every day for years while studying like an idiot for some stupid degree in order to get a somewhat decent job one day is no work at all.

Only if you "play fair".
But life ain't fair.....
So why should I play it that way?


And you're not into nerdy girls either. So you'll be perpetually rejected and lonely no matter what. You're okay with that.

>And you're not into nerdy girls either
I'm not the guy you're talking to, but... says who? I prefer nerdy women over stereotypical hot ones.


Yeah, but she's ugly as f**k.

And so are you.

No, see, I'm a guy, so what I say I'm attracted to isn't actually bullsh*t? Okay, so, here we go:
I'm into chicks that I can hold an intelligent conversation with.
****F**KING BOMBSHELL****

Okay, here she is then. Will you date her?



Only if you "play fair".
But life ain't fair.....
So why should I play it that way?

Then stop claiming being male is all easy and sh*t.
Being born a pretty woman requires luck, yes, but certainly not any effort.


And so are you.

Okay, here she is then. Will you date her?

>fatgirls_still41.jpg
Really?


>implying /fit/ represents the general male population
>implying /fit/ is comprised mostly of drool-worthy sex gods
>implying your only experience seeing other men comes from /fit/
>implying you don't go outside
>implying anonymous

IM VOICING MY OPINION ON THE INTERNET


Then stop claiming being male is all easy and sh*t.
Being born a pretty woman requires luck, yes, but certainly not any effort.

Man if you believe that being an attractive woman doesn't involve painstaking effort and constant self-loathing, you've obviously never spoken to a pretty girl. That sh*t takes WORK.

>fatgirls_still41.jpg
Really?

The only requirement was that she's good at conversation. And this girl spends all of her time reading philosophy and studying physics when she's not doing groundbreaking biology research. It's why she has no time to exercise.

I'm on the thinner side of muscular, I'm attractive, f**k if it wasn't for my weak jaw I'd be a model (people have said I SHOULD go into modelling).
Why don't I have these ronery girls hitting on me?
There are so many flaws in your theories, anon.


And so are you.

Okay, here she is then. Will you date her?

Oh Christ, I actually need to lay out a full list of requirements?
Okay:
Interesting conversation.
Cares about their health.
Isn't hideous.
No sexual hang-ups.
Not religious.
This is probably about 15% of the female population. If I remove interesting conversation it probably jumps to about 60%. But that still doesn't mean I'm only attracted to playboy models.


Man if you believe that being an attractive woman doesn't involve painstaking effort and constant self-loathing, you've obviously never spoken to a pretty girl. That sh*t takes WORK.

The only requirement was that she's good at conversation. And this girl spends all of her time reading philosophy and studying physics when she's not doing groundbreaking biology research. It's why she has no time to exercise.

It requires not being fat.
Some make up is optional, if she is really beautiful.
What more? Oh right, being present. OH THE PAIN.


Man if you believe that being an attractive woman doesn't involve painstaking effort and constant self-loathing, you've obviously never spoken to a pretty girl. That sh*t takes WORK.

The only requirement was that she's good at conversation. And this girl spends all of her time reading philosophy and studying physics when she's not doing groundbreaking biology research. It's why she has no time to exercise.

>this girl spends all of her time reading philosophy and studying physics when she's not doing groundbreaking biology research. It's why she has no time to exercise.
You can't know that.
Also, I'm beginning to think you yourself are ahambeast.


Man if you believe that being an attractive woman doesn't involve painstaking effort and constant self-loathing, you've obviously never spoken to a pretty girl. That sh*t takes WORK.

The only requirement was that she's good at conversation. And this girl spends all of her time reading philosophy and studying physics when she's not doing groundbreaking biology research. It's why she has no time to exercise.

itt: a lazy beached whale.


Oh Christ, I actually need to lay out a full list of requirements?
Okay:
Interesting conversation.
Cares about their health.
Isn't hideous.
No sexual hang-ups.
Not religious.
This is probably about 15% of the female population. If I remove interesting conversation it probably jumps to about 60%. But that still doesn't mean I'm only attracted to playboy models.

>Isn't hideous
BAM. So sexual attraction matters. And if there were two girls, one of which was an order of magnitude more attractive than the other (who is still pretty, might I add), you're *honestly* telling me you'd go right away for the less attractive one? That's not how people are wired, anon.
You'd f**k the hot one and you know it.

People are shallow. Everyone is. We're meant to be. Enjoy your life.

BE ALPHA
GET BITCHES


Man if you believe that being an attractive woman doesn't involve painstaking effort and constant self-loathing, you've obviously never spoken to a pretty girl. That sh*t takes WORK.

The only requirement was that she's good at conversation. And this girl spends all of her time reading philosophy and studying physics when she's not doing groundbreaking biology research. It's why she has no time to exercise.

>It's why she has no time to exercise.
She seems to have plenty of time to stuff her face.

People are shallow. Everyone is. We're meant to be. Enjoy your life.

Women care more about looks than men.


Women care more about looks than men.

Except for the part where men consistently want supermodel types and women's tastes vary all over the f**king place.
Oops~


I wish there was a girl pining away for me.
I would love her and take care of her all I could no matter what she looked like/what she acted like, because she chose ME out of all other guys.
Too bad that'll never happen :(
Basically, you are so very wrong.

Certainly, this happens!
The guy that I'm with now, we were best friends through all of highschool, but due to terrible comminucation issues and misunderstandings, nothing became of it. I had a fierce crush on him for the longest time, because he treated me like I was just one of the guys, instead of 'gb2 kitchen' jokes or 'zomg gamer womynz want'. Its weird for me, because up until I met these guys and had a stable social circle, I was SUPREMELY awkward. I got picked on all through my life and I had/have self esteem issues. When guys would flirt with me, I was terrified they were trolling me.
All of that still basically applies, even though I'm three years out of highschool. This past winter, I was having a rough time with family stuff, and he... wasn't actually that helpful? Lol, that sounds weird, but he didn't just let me feel sorry for myself about it.
In a moment of weakness, I confessed how I felt about him. TBH I don't think he believed me. I think maybe he assumed that I was just lonely and emotionally confused and all of that. We didn't really talk about it much for a while... Its awkward. lol
tl;dr dating my best friend from highschool. Both terrible geeks. Nerd love.


>Isn't hideous
BAM. So sexual attraction matters. And if there were two girls, one of which was an order of magnitude more attractive than the other (who is still pretty, might I add), you're *honestly* telling me you'd go right away for the less attractive one? That's not how people are wired, anon.
You'd f**k the hot one and you know it.

BAM.
I said "isn't hideous", not "must be hot".
All things being equal, yeah, I'd go for the hotter one. That doesn't prove jack sh*t other than I recognise sexual attraction has value. It says nothing about its value VS other attributes.
Even so, I'm being honest about it and not telling all girls everywhere that I'll date them as long as they have confidence, am I?


Except for the part where men consistently want supermodel types and women's tastes vary all over the f**king place.
Oops~

>where men consistently want supermodel types
Stop watching sh*t movies you dumb bitch.
>and women's tastes vary all over the f**king place.
They do? Because as far as I can tell it's just 'hot guys who dress up and do their hairs in varying ways'.
Look at how many chubby chasing men there are. Or how many different male fetishists there are for odd things.
Men care less about looks. F**k, even my girlfriend admitted it. She said that if you aren't good looking, you're basically a non-entity as far as women go.
Why can't you admit it?


BAM.
I said "isn't hideous", not "must be hot".
All things being equal, yeah, I'd go for the hotter one. That doesn't prove jack sh*t other than I recognise sexual attraction has value. It says nothing about its value VS other attributes.
Even so, I'm being honest about it and not telling all girls everywhere that I'll date them as long as they have confidence, am I?

No, you aren't, but you're in this weird camp of people that seems to assert that when women do the same thing they're suddenly evil wh**res. Why?


>Isn't hideous
BAM. So sexual attraction matters. And if there were two girls, one of which was an order of magnitude more attractive than the other (who is still pretty, might I add), you're *honestly* telling me you'd go right away for the less attractive one? That's not how people are wired, anon.
You'd f**k the hot one and you know it.

True, but beauty is subjective. I personally find the stereotypical big-titted, blonde-haired girl to be FAR less attractive than the average, girl-next-door-looking chick.
And you know what? If I knew a girl who was into video games, liked the things I did and OFFERED SEX TO ME WILLINGLY AND OPENLY, even if a girl I found to be hotter walked up to me immediately afterward and offered sex too, if she even had the slightest hint of bitchiness that OP's comic suggests, I'd go for the less attractive chick. Especially since you're intent on making his only slightly less attractive and not a hambeast.
You have failed in your logic trap.


No, you aren't, but you're in this weird camp of people that seems to assert that when women do the same thing they're suddenly evil wh**res. Why?

I don't know what you're talking about.
I'm being honest about what I want. Women aren't. Thats why I hate them.


>where men consistently want supermodel types
Stop watching sh*t movies you dumb bitch.
>and women's tastes vary all over the f**king place.
They do? Because as far as I can tell it's just 'hot guys who dress up and do their hairs in varying ways'.
Look at how many chubby chasing men there are. Or how many different male fetishists there are for odd things.
Men care less about looks. F**k, even my girlfriend admitted it. She said that if you aren't good looking, you're basically a non-entity as far as women go.
Why can't you admit it?

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090626153511.htm
Sorry sweet cheeks, you're a primate just like the rest of us.


>where men consistently want supermodel types
Stop watching sh*t movies you dumb bitch.
>and women's tastes vary all over the f**king place.
They do? Because as far as I can tell it's just 'hot guys who dress up and do their hairs in varying ways'.
Look at how many chubby chasing men there are. Or how many different male fetishists there are for odd things.
Men care less about looks. F**k, even my girlfriend admitted it. She said that if you aren't good looking, you're basically a non-entity as far as women go.
Why can't you admit it?

>F**k, even my girlfriend admitted it.
I sure do love that anecdotal evidence right there.
I'll give you a hint, the post you quoted was satire. You know why? Because that is exactly what you are saying right now, except the other way around.
I'll tell you right now, men generally have the same taste in women, with individuals preferring certain attributes above others. Women are the same.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090626153511.htm
Sorry sweet cheeks, you're a primate just like the rest of us.

Go and be a shallow wh**re somewhere else.
How many dick have you sucked?


True, but beauty is subjective. I personally find the stereotypical big-titted, blonde-haired girl to be FAR less attractive than the average, girl-next-door-looking chick.
And you know what? If I knew a girl who was into video games, liked the things I did and OFFERED SEX TO ME WILLINGLY AND OPENLY, even if a girl I found to be hotter walked up to me immediately afterward and offered sex too, if she even had the slightest hint of bitchiness that OP's comic suggests, I'd go for the less attractive chick. Especially since you're intent on making his only slightly less attractive and not a hambeast.
You have failed in your logic trap.

How do you feel about women who pretend to be interested in video games/comic books because they want geeks to drool over her?
I know girls like this. They don't know sh*t. They make me rage.


Go and be a shallow wh**re somewhere else.
How many dick have you sucked?

Resorting to ad hominem remarks when you don't have evidence? Tsk, tsk.


How do you feel about women who pretend to be interested in video games/comic books because they want geeks to drool over her?
I know girls like this. They don't know sh*t. They make me rage.

Are you telling me you've never feigned interest in something some girl was going on about in order to get into her pants? Please.


How do you feel about women who pretend to be interested in video games/comic books because they want geeks to drool over her?
I know girls like this. They don't know sh*t. They make me rage.

Guys like to pretend to be sensitive and sh*t too so that girls will think they're good people, then they pump and dump them.
Both genders are duplicitous and evil.


Resorting to ad hominem remarks when you don't have evidence? Tsk, tsk.

Ok slut, tell me something.
How many female chubby chasers are there?


Are you telling me you've never feigned interest in something some girl was going on about in order to get into her pants? Please.

No--I think he's telling you he's never gotten into a girl's pants.


Guys like to pretend to be sensitive and sh*t too so that girls will think they're good people, then they pump and dump them.
Both genders are duplicitous and evil.

Are you kidding? If they're good looking they don't need to be sensitive, the girl will f**k them anyway.


No--I think he's telling you he's never gotten into a girl's pants.

Why have females had sex but male anons haven't generally speaking?
Is it fair to say women cannot feel loneliness?


Ok slut, tell me something.
How many female chubby chasers are there?

Why would I know that? How many male chubby chasers are out there? Fetishizing someone's size is not really representative of normal sexual behavior.


The difference is that men don't claim to want otherwise.

But if a man says something like that, it's ok. If a woman admits something like that, she's a wh**re.


Are you kidding? If they're good looking they don't need to be sensitive, the girl will f**k them anyway.

See, unlike you, I actually have a bunch of female friends. That's not how it works.

Why have females had sex but male anons haven't generally speaking?
Is it fair to say women cannot feel loneliness?

You can have joyless sex and still feel lonely. That said, society pressures women to give up the goods as early as possible. Guys pressure girls into sex before they're ready. Really, they do. Why do you think rape even happens?

I think part of the problem is a lot of women look past how a guy looks. Hell, I used to think that's how most women were wired. Sure, you have physical attributes that you find attractive, but you're supposed to be the sex that finds attraction through emotions and situations, not visual stimulation. That's why guys are into porn and women are into Twilight (I'm generalizing, of course). Women want context, men want looks.
So are men shallow at times? Yes. But when a woman dumps a nice guy for an abusive a**hole, what are we supposed to think?

GOD DAMN YOU GUYS STILL CRY OVER THIS SH*T
QUIT BEING A F**KWAD CLEAN UR BALLS GET A HAIRKUT AND GO GET SOME WEMEN.


Why have females had sex but male anons haven't generally speaking?
Is it fair to say women cannot feel loneliness?

>Why have females had sex but male anons haven't generally speaking?
It doesn't matter, we're subhuman as far as most women including females on here are concerned and therefore do not count.


Why would I know that? How many male chubby chasers are out there? Fetishizing someone's size is not really representative of normal sexual behavior.

The point he's making is that there's more male chubby chasers than female, because men appreciate a wider variety of looks in a woman.
Women all want the same looking guy. No matter how many say they like their skinny or effeminate guys, they'd all f**k the dude in that one chatroulette gif in a heartbeat.
Someone will know what I'm talking about, it's the one where the guy managed to get 3 girls to get naked on cam and masturbate with the same f**king gif.
In b4 I'd do the same, I'f run into tons of hot women masturbating and not once did I f**king strip and wank on cam.

I think part of the problem is a lot of women look past how a guy looks. Hell, I used to think that's how most women were wired. Sure, you have physical attributes that you find attractive, but you're supposed to be the sex that finds attraction through emotions and situations, not visual stimulation. That's why guys are into porn and women are into Twilight (I'm generalizing, of course). Women want context, men want looks.
So are men shallow at times? Yes. But when a woman dumps a nice guy for an abusive a**hole, what are we supposed to think?

It's weird, because I've never actually heard of something like that happening. What I *have* heard of, though, is girls rejecting "nice guys" that feign being really considerate and such in order to get into a girl's pants, followed by getting with a guy who's a little more manly and fun.
Most couples I've met are pretty boring, anyway. Boring guy, boring girl.


But if a man says something like that, it's ok. If a woman admits something like that, she's a wh**re.

Now you're getting it!
And they say women can't learn.


Are you telling me you've never feigned interest in something some girl was going on about in order to get into her pants? Please.

I'm a girl. And I'd like to think that I'm about average in the looks department. But I share an apartment with a girl who is, for whatever reason, got guys falling all over themselves for her. We have some mutual friends who come over to hang out, and after a while, it usually devolves into vidyas and pot. The only time she picks up a controller is when someone she finds attractive is playing too. Which, yeah, whatever. Good for her. But she talks it up like she's a super-geek or something.

GOD DAMN YOU GUYS STILL CRY OVER THIS SH*T
QUIT BEING A F**KWAD CLEAN UR BALLS GET A HAIRKUT AND GO GET SOME WEMEN.

Wow the only way to get women is to become the same douche we hate.
CHOICES.


See, unlike you, I actually have a bunch of female friends. That's not how it works.

You can have joyless sex and still feel lonely. That said, society pressures women to give up the goods as early as possible. Guys pressure girls into sex before they're ready. Really, they do. Why do you think rape even happens?

Why are you defending whorishness?
Why don't you tell us how many men you have slept with?


I'm a girl. And I'd like to think that I'm about average in the looks department. But I share an apartment with a girl who is, for whatever reason, got guys falling all over themselves for her. We have some mutual friends who come over to hang out, and after a while, it usually devolves into vidyas and pot. The only time she picks up a controller is when someone she finds attractive is playing too. Which, yeah, whatever. Good for her. But she talks it up like she's a super-geek or something.

>I'm about average in the looks department.
So you go for guys who are above you?
Generally women care more about looks than men.


The point he's making is that there's more male chubby chasers than female, because men appreciate a wider variety of looks in a woman.
Women all want the same looking guy. No matter how many say they like their skinny or effeminate guys, they'd all f**k the dude in that one chatroulette gif in a heartbeat.
Someone will know what I'm talking about, it's the one where the guy managed to get 3 girls to get naked on cam and masturbate with the same f**king gif.
In b4 I'd do the same, I'f run into tons of hot women masturbating and not once did I f**king strip and wank on cam.

>Describing a situation where one person sampled many women to show a phenomenon
>Describing a situation where many women sampled one person (you) and you didn't respond
>Implying this generalizes to all men and women
Sorry, but no. Additionally, did you even read that article? Studies do show that men are pretty clear and consistent about what they want in women, whether you like it or not:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090626153511.htm
"Men's judgments of women's attractiveness were based primarily around physical features and they rated highly those who looked thin and seductive. Most of the men in the study also rated photographs of women who looked confident as more attractive."


Why are you defending whorishness?
Why don't you tell us how many men you have slept with?

One. Why do you ask?
Furthermore, why would the number of sexual partners I've had be a good or bad thing? I've met guys that have had a dozen sexual partners and girls that have had one. In fact, in general men have more sexual partners than women.


The point he's making is that there's more male chubby chasers than female, because men appreciate a wider variety of looks in a woman.
Women all want the same looking guy. No matter how many say they like their skinny or effeminate guys, they'd all f**k the dude in that one chatroulette gif in a heartbeat.
Someone will know what I'm talking about, it's the one where the guy managed to get 3 girls to get naked on cam and masturbate with the same f**king gif.
In b4 I'd do the same, I'f run into tons of hot women masturbating and not once did I f**king strip and wank on cam.

Women are so f**king shallow it's untrue, not only do they only go for looks. But they actually believe somebody is a better person the better looking they are.


>I'm about average in the looks department.
So you go for guys who are above you?
Generally women care more about looks than men.

No, I 'go' for guys I'm comfortable with. Also, I never said anything about me personally flirting with any of these guys, because they're my friends and that's gross. I'm saying I hate watching my friends get worked over by her so that she can get the c**k.
F**k, you know what? I hate women too.


One. Why do you ask?
Furthermore, why would the number of sexual partners I've had be a good or bad thing? I've met guys that have had a dozen sexual partners and girls that have had one. In fact, in general men have more sexual partners than women.

Meh, depends. In my country, at age 21, women have an average of 9 sexual partners, and men 7. Though that was based on a survey taken by Yes magazine, which is a typical late teens/early twenties shallow girl magazine, so that's probably not very accurate.


One. Why do you ask?
Furthermore, why would the number of sexual partners I've had be a good or bad thing? I've met guys that have had a dozen sexual partners and girls that have had one. In fact, in general men have more sexual partners than women.

I'm just laughing, because really, lets be honest here, women cannot feel loneliness.


>Describing a situation where one person sampled many women to show a phenomenon
>Describing a situation where many women sampled one person (you) and you didn't respond
>Implying this generalizes to all men and women
Sorry, but no. Additionally, did you even read that article? Studies do show that men are pretty clear and consistent about what they want in women, whether you like it or not:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090626153511.htm
"Men's judgments of women's attractiveness were based primarily around physical features and they rated highly those who looked thin and seductive. Most of the men in the study also rated photographs of women who looked confident as more attractive."

It doesn't matter that most men like what the media tells them to like. Men still appreciate a wider variety.
For f**k's sake, the idea of a "breasts man" and an "ass man" is proof of this concept. There is no equivalent for women, they all want the same sh*t.


I'm just laughing, because really, lets be honest here, women cannot feel loneliness.

Neither can men. Men just aren't willing to settle for less, or change to become more attractive.


One. Why do you ask?
Furthermore, why would the number of sexual partners I've had be a good or bad thing? I've met guys that have had a dozen sexual partners and girls that have had one. In fact, in general men have more sexual partners than women.

Doubt it.
Even if some dudes sleep around more, some chicks sleep around about the same amount.
and for men you have a sh*tload of zeros to factor in.

There seems to be an odd contradiction here and I can't figure it out myself, honestly.
- On average women prefer personality over looks (or so I thought). Men are supposed to be "visual", while women are "emotional." There are fat guys who are swingers. May not be common, but it happens.
- But then you have the concept that the average guy would f**k anything with a pulse.
What I'm getting at is both sexes seem capable of f**king regardless of attractiveness.


Meh, depends. In my country, at age 21, women have an average of 9 sexual partners, and men 7. Though that was based on a survey taken by Yes magazine, which is a typical late teens/early twenties shallow girl magazine, so that's probably not very accurate.

If we're talking the difference between 9 and 7, that's not very huge.

I'm just laughing, because really, lets be honest here, women cannot feel loneliness.

[citation needed]


It doesn't matter that most men like what the media tells them to like. Men still appreciate a wider variety.
For f**k's sake, the idea of a "breasts man" and an "ass man" is proof of this concept. There is no equivalent for women, they all want the same sh*t.

>Men still appreciate a wider variety.
Except that a scientific study just proved that is not the case. Enjoy your crazy creationist like logic.
Also, really? Men are less shallow because we can be divided into ass men and tits men? You're so f**king retarded.

I've never met a woman who liked westerns, I guess westerns are just too manly for women.
Women prefer romantic comedies to watch with their effeminate hipster boyfriends.
Also, women have bad taste because they're shallow, the reason they watch romcoms is because hot guys are in them - Same reason for anything really, they even read books on the basis of how the character looks, like with Twilight - Or listen to music based on how attractive the frontman is. Search your heart, you know it to be true.


I'm just laughing, because really, lets be honest here, women cannot feel loneliness.

>In fact, in general men have more sexual partners than women.
Maybe the men you f**k, enjoying being part of a harm by the way?
Otherwise, no, on average women have way more sexual partners. You just aen't factoring in the countless men with little sexual experience at all. And why would you? you're an attractive girl, as far as you know those men don't exist. The only men that are even so much as a blip on your radar are those that f**k tons of chicks, and therefore that makes YOU want to f**k them.
But, of course, you don't want to admit that. So you make up some bullsh*t about what guys you're actually into whilst running contradictory to it on a regular basis.


If we're talking the difference between 9 and 7, that's not very huge.

[citation needed]

I know. The funniest thing is the '90% of women sleep with 10% of men' statistic anonymous loves so much.
People, do the math. That's not even f**king possible with a 50-50 division of men and women in a population.


Ok slut, tell me something.
How many female chubby chasers are there?

Pretty much any guy will admit that tits are a part of sexual attraction, for some way more than for others. When chicks get fatter, their tits grow more. I'm assuming this is at least a good part of the chubby chasing fetish.
When a dude gets fatter his tits also get larger, sadly females generally aren't seeking out men with giant tits. It just makes their dick look smaller.

I don't know any chubby chasers personally, so I really don't know much about the whole fetish, but those assumptions seem like a fairly logical explanation, at least in part, for why there would be a large amount of male chubby chasers as opposed to females.


It doesn't matter that most men like what the media tells them to like. Men still appreciate a wider variety.
For f**k's sake, the idea of a "breasts man" and an "ass man" is proof of this concept. There is no equivalent for women, they all want the same sh*t.

Except there's a scientific study that contradicts what you just said.
I mean, really? You're going to take evidence against your point and just ignore it?

I've never met a woman who liked westerns, I guess westerns are just too manly for women.
Women prefer romantic comedies to watch with their effeminate hipster boyfriends.
Also, women have bad taste because they're shallow, the reason they watch romcoms is because hot guys are in them - Same reason for anything really, they even read books on the basis of how the character looks, like with Twilight - Or listen to music based on how attractive the frontman is. Search your heart, you know it to be true.

Seeing as ho I'm currently listening to Leonard Cohen... I disagree.


>In fact, in general men have more sexual partners than women.
Maybe the men you f**k, enjoying being part of a harm by the way?
Otherwise, no, on average women have way more sexual partners. You just aen't factoring in the countless men with little sexual experience at all. And why would you? you're an attractive girl, as far as you know those men don't exist. The only men that are even so much as a blip on your radar are those that f**k tons of chicks, and therefore that makes YOU want to f**k them.
But, of course, you don't want to admit that. So you make up some bullsh*t about what guys you're actually into whilst running contradictory to it on a regular basis.

>I believe I have intimate knowledge of people I talked to on the internet for two minutes and have never met in real life
This, anonymous,is why people look down on you.

OP you missed the greater hidden message here. `Ronery girl` hits on dude, dude gets social proof, other girls hit on him. It's a vicious system.


Pretty much any guy will admit that tits are a part of sexual attraction, for some way more than for others. When chicks get fatter, their tits grow more. I'm assuming this is at least a good part of the chubby chasing fetish.
When a dude gets fatter his tits also get larger, sadly females generally aren't seeking out men with giant tits. It just makes their dick look smaller.

I don't know any chubby chasers personally, so I really don't know much about the whole fetish, but those assumptions seem like a fairly logical explanation, at least in part, for why there would be a large amount of male chubby chasers as opposed to females.

And yet it is incredibly easy to get a "delicious flat chests" thread going


Pretty much any guy will admit that tits are a part of sexual attraction, for some way more than for others. When chicks get fatter, their tits grow more. I'm assuming this is at least a good part of the chubby chasing fetish.
When a dude gets fatter his tits also get larger, sadly females generally aren't seeking out men with giant tits. It just makes their dick look smaller.

I don't know any chubby chasers personally, so I really don't know much about the whole fetish, but those assumptions seem like a fairly logical explanation, at least in part, for why there would be a large amount of male chubby chasers as opposed to females.

Still, the point is more men seem to have fetishes than women.
What about men who are into midgets, or amputees, or muscular women, etc etc?


>Men still appreciate a wider variety.
Except that a scientific study just proved that is not the case. Enjoy your crazy creationist like logic.
Also, really? Men are less shallow because we can be divided into ass men and tits men? You're so f**king retarded.

The study proved that there's a trend, not that there's a complete lack of variety.
Learn to interpret data.


Seeing as ho I'm currently listening to Leonard Cohen... I disagree.

Leonard Cohen is an average looking old man you shallow girl.

I've never met a woman who liked westerns, I guess westerns are just too manly for women.
Women prefer romantic comedies to watch with their effeminate hipster boyfriends.
Also, women have bad taste because they're shallow, the reason they watch romcoms is because hot guys are in them - Same reason for anything really, they even read books on the basis of how the character looks, like with Twilight - Or listen to music based on how attractive the frontman is. Search your heart, you know it to be true.

And I bet you meet a lot of women, athens.
Protip: you can't be an expert on something you have no experience of. So bitter virgins, please shut up.


>In fact, in general men have more sexual partners than women.
Maybe the men you f**k, enjoying being part of a harm by the way?
Otherwise, no, on average women have way more sexual partners. You just aen't factoring in the countless men with little sexual experience at all. And why would you? you're an attractive girl, as far as you know those men don't exist. The only men that are even so much as a blip on your radar are those that f**k tons of chicks, and therefore that makes YOU want to f**k them.
But, of course, you don't want to admit that. So you make up some bullsh*t about what guys you're actually into whilst running contradictory to it on a regular basis.

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/10/13/1191696214489.html
Okay, so New Zealand women like to f**k around a lot. My point in pasting this is:
"New Zealand was the only country where women were more promiscuous than their men, who averaged 16.8 sexual partners, The Press newspaper said, reporting the survey."


Leonard Cohen is an average looking old man you shallow girl.

I'm pretty sure you can't see the artist when listening to their music. Generally. Nor does their appearance somehow magically add to the enjoyment of the music.


Wow the only way to get women is to become the same douche we hate.
CHOICES.

Well, did you ever noticed that there are other guys who are always with a hot girl around and aren't douches, did you?

It's weird, because I've never actually heard of something like that happening. What I *have* heard of, though, is girls rejecting "nice guys" that feign being really considerate and such in order to get into a girl's pants, followed by getting with a guy who's a little more manly and fun.
Most couples I've met are pretty boring, anyway. Boring guy, boring girl.

THIS. Did you ever noticed that 95% of the people that you know are not very interesting? The question is: if you was a girl and could choose who is taking you out saturday night would you go with the unsocial guy, with the average one or the interesting one? The answer to your roneryness is to stop being uninteresting. If you just meet a girl and started talking what would you have to talk about? What interesting things you ever did in life? What things that you are doing that you could tell her and make she think "wow!"? Stop being on the internet all day and put the vidya away from your hands reach and go do some acting classes, learn how to play something, climb a rock or anything like that.


The study proved that there's a trend, not that there's a complete lack of variety.
Learn to interpret data.

It also showed women have more diverse tastes than men.
So...yeah. If it showed a trend for men, and a trend for women, and it indicated that women like more variety than men, that doesn't bode well for your claim.


Still, the point is more men seem to have fetishes than women.
What about men who are into midgets, or amputees, or muscular women, etc etc?

This might have more to do with men being more into pornography than women.

Bicker like 12 year olds.


Leonard Cohen is an average looking old man you shallow girl.


I'm pretty sure you can't see the artist when listening to their music. Generally. Nor does their appearance somehow magically add to the enjoyment of the music.

/sigh.
What I'm saying is that *I* don't find him sexually attractive, but I still enjoy it.


Well, did you ever noticed that there are other guys who are always with a hot girl around and aren't douches, did you?

THIS. Did you ever noticed that 95% of the people that you know are not very interesting? The question is: if you was a girl and could choose who is taking you out saturday night would you go with the unsocial guy, with the average one or the interesting one? The answer to your roneryness is to stop being uninteresting. If you just meet a girl and started talking what would you have to talk about? What interesting things you ever did in life? What things that you are doing that you could tell her and make she think "wow!"? Stop being on the internet all day and put the vidya away from your hands reach and go do some acting classes, learn how to play something, climb a rock or anything like that.

You have a point.
But on the other hand all a woman has to do is be sexy. It's a little discouraging, you know?


It also showed women have more diverse tastes than men.
So...yeah. If it showed a trend for men, and a trend for women, and it indicated that women like more variety than men, that doesn't bode well for your claim.

>have more diverse tastes than men.
In regards to the physical or in regards to how they present themselves? Because as far as I'm concerned, lots of women just like variants of a good looking hipster, albeit dressed up in different clothes.


This might have more to do with men being more into pornography than women.

Yeah, but that doesn't really answer anything.


It also showed women have more diverse tastes than men.
So...yeah. If it showed a trend for men, and a trend for women, and it indicated that women like more variety than men, that doesn't bode well for your claim.

In lab conditions women still bullsh*t about what they look.
Woopdee doo.



/sigh.
What I'm saying is that *I* don't find him sexually attractive, but I still enjoy it.

Better get back to listening to Justin Timberlake then, shouldn't you?


Better get back to listening to Justin Timberlake then, shouldn't you?

Because he's sexually unappealing too? What?


You have a point.
But on the other hand all a woman has to do is be sexy. It's a little discouraging, you know?

I don't think you understand how much effort it takes to look good. You need to match your outfits, buy clothing that is the right fit--which is going to be overly tight, thin, and expensive, not to mention outdated in a year--get the right kind of makeup, eat nothing, exercise all the time, and outclass other girls so that you can be the Suzie Q to Johnny Smith.
There's so much pressure for girls to be hot and so much effort that goes into it that it's absurd. It's not just a natural thing.


You have a point.
But on the other hand all a woman has to do is be sexy. It's a little discouraging, you know?

All a guy has to do is be sexy and women will throw themselves at them.


In lab conditions women still bullsh*t about what they look.
Woopdee doo.

whoops
*like


In lab conditions women still bullsh*t about what they look.
Woopdee doo.

...So the study is invalidated because you think all of the women are lying? You're no better than religious people who throw out any evidence against what they believe simply because it's not something that they agree with.
Also, I'm a little offended on behalf of the researchers that they wouldn't attempt to account for social desirability biases.


Better get back to listening to Justin Timberlake then, shouldn't you?

Only 14 year olds think Justin Timberlake is hot, try again.


And I bet you meet a lot of women, athens.
Protip: you can't be an expert on something you have no experience of. So bitter virgins, please shut up.

Women are generally all the same, give or take a few outliers. They're lemmings, they're not independent thinkers politically, which is why you see them following cult like political movements (hope and change). In regards to culture, they generally like things that men impart to them, or things that have good looking guys in them like romantic comedies. Women are not into good movies or music, a few are into good literature, but very, very, very few of those who consider themselves literati even.


...So the study is invalidated because you think all of the women are lying? You're no better than religious people who throw out any evidence against what they believe simply because it's not something that they agree with.
Also, I'm a little offended on behalf of the researchers that they wouldn't attempt to account for social desirability biases.

Rather, that you think they wouldn't control for it.

All a guy has to do is be sexy and women will throw themselves at them.

This. It just so happens that people who really bust their asses to look hot make it their lives, and in so doing just all f**k each other.


Yeah, but that doesn't really answer anything.

How can you tell if a fetish is popular? How much porn there is of it. Women, for the most part, don't watch a whole lot of porn.


I don't think you understand how much effort it takes to look good. You need to match your outfits, buy clothing that is the right fit--which is going to be overly tight, thin, and expensive, not to mention outdated in a year--get the right kind of makeup, eat nothing, exercise all the time, and outclass other girls so that you can be the Suzie Q to Johnny Smith.
There's so much pressure for girls to be hot and so much effort that goes into it that it's absurd. It's not just a natural thing.

So are you saying there's no such thing as natural beauty?
Or are you saying that with enough makeup and nice clothes even an average girl can look amazing?
Because it's that's the case the girl in OP's comic doesn't have much of an excuse, does she?
Seriously, I can tell I'll never be able to convince you of this, but as long as you're not a hambeast, 90% of the sh*t you do to look pretty guys don't care about. Girls do that to compete with other girls. We don't care.


All a guy has to do is be sexy and women will throw themselves at them.

No, see, that's only true depending on what anonymous is bitching about. If they're bitching about how women are shallow, then yes, that is true. If they're bitching about how women are wh**res and can't be lonely because guys throw themselves at them, then no, it's not.


Women are generally all the same, give or take a few outliers. They're lemmings, they're not independent thinkers politically, which is why you see them following cult like political movements (hope and change). In regards to culture, they generally like things that men impart to them, or things that have good looking guys in them like romantic comedies. Women are not into good movies or music, a few are into good literature, but very, very, very few of those who consider themselves literati even.

See

>Describing a situation where one person sampled many women to show a phenomenon
>Describing a situation where many women sampled one person (you) and you didn't respond
>Implying this generalizes to all men and women
Sorry, but no. Additionally, did you even read that article? Studies do show that men are pretty clear and consistent about what they want in women, whether you like it or not:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090626153511.htm
"Men's judgments of women's attractiveness were based primarily around physical features and they rated highly those who looked thin and seductive. Most of the men in the study also rated photographs of women who looked confident as more attractive."
before you start claiming all women are the same.


...So the study is invalidated because you think all of the women are lying? You're no better than religious people who throw out any evidence against what they believe simply because it's not something that they agree with.
Also, I'm a little offended on behalf of the researchers that they wouldn't attempt to account for social desirability biases.

To be honest, social science studies really doen't carry much weight.
How many studies have there been on violent video games with completely different results, again?


Women are generally all the same, give or take a few outliers. They're lemmings, they're not independent thinkers politically, which is why you see them following cult like political movements (hope and change). In regards to culture, they generally like things that men impart to them, or things that have good looking guys in them like romantic comedies. Women are not into good movies or music, a few are into good literature, but very, very, very few of those who consider themselves literati even.

Your generalizations are insulting.


I don't think you understand how much effort it takes to look good. You need to match your outfits, buy clothing that is the right fit--which is going to be overly tight, thin, and expensive, not to mention outdated in a year--get the right kind of makeup, eat nothing, exercise all the time, and outclass other girls so that you can be the Suzie Q to Johnny Smith.
There's so much pressure for girls to be hot and so much effort that goes into it that it's absurd. It's not just a natural thing.

>You need to match your outfits, buy clothing that is the right fit--which is going to be overly tight, thin, and expensive, not to mention outdated in a year--get the right kind of makeup, eat nothing, exercise all the time, and outclass other girls so that you can be the Suzie Q to Johnny Smith.
No you don't.
You just need to look average and you'll get sex and eventually a few boyfriends.

Only 14 year olds think Justin Timberlake is hot, try again.

Well, whoever the f**k you women are listening to these days. I don't keep up with trends but I'm sure your taste is as sh*t as it was when I was at school.


See before you start claiming all women are the same.

I agree with

>have more diverse tastes than men.
In regards to the physical or in regards to how they present themselves? Because as far as I'm concerned, lots of women just like variants of a good looking hipster, albeit dressed up in different clothes.
, change the hairstyle a little and the clothes and the woman will think it's a completely different person, provided he falls into a different subcultural archetype.


So are you saying there's no such thing as natural beauty?
Or are you saying that with enough makeup and nice clothes even an average girl can look amazing?
Because it's that's the case the girl in OP's comic doesn't have much of an excuse, does she?
Seriously, I can tell I'll never be able to convince you of this, but as long as you're not a hambeast, 90% of the sh*t you do to look pretty guys don't care about. Girls do that to compete with other girls. We don't care.

>90% of the sh*t you do to look pretty guys don't care about
Speak for yourself. I like it when a girl puts a little effort into looking good. I mean, there's no need for fake tans and caked on makeup, put a little eyeliner and lipstick go a long way. Also nicely done hair. And shaved legs. Earrings are weird though, but that's just me.


>You need to match your outfits, buy clothing that is the right fit--which is going to be overly tight, thin, and expensive, not to mention outdated in a year--get the right kind of makeup, eat nothing, exercise all the time, and outclass other girls so that you can be the Suzie Q to Johnny Smith.
No you don't.
You just need to look average and you'll get sex and eventually a few boyfriends.

Well, whoever the f**k you women are listening to these days. I don't keep up with trends but I'm sure your taste is as sh*t as it was when I was at school.

So what you're saying is... you have no idea what you're talking about and making vague guesses based on being shot down by girls out of your league. Nice.

ITT:
>I know a few bitches and wh**res, therefore all women are bitches and wh**res.
>Men are shallow, women aren't shallow
>Women are shallow, men aren't shallow.
>Only men can be lonely.
>I know a few women that are attracted to X, therefore all women are attracted to X.
>I know a few men that are attracted to X, therefore all men are attracted to X.


Your generalizations are insulting.

Your whorishness sickens me.
I think we're even.


>You need to match your outfits, buy clothing that is the right fit--which is going to be overly tight, thin, and expensive, not to mention outdated in a year--get the right kind of makeup, eat nothing, exercise all the time, and outclass other girls so that you can be the Suzie Q to Johnny Smith.
No you don't.
You just need to look average and you'll get sex and eventually a few boyfriends.

Well, whoever the f**k you women are listening to these days. I don't keep up with trends but I'm sure your taste is as sh*t as it was when I was at school.

>You just need to look average and you'll get sex and eventually a few boyfriends.
Not the point. People tend to want sex and be in relationships with people they find attractive, not the people desperate enough to have sex with anybody.


>90% of the sh*t you do to look pretty guys don't care about
Speak for yourself. I like it when a girl puts a little effort into looking good. I mean, there's no need for fake tans and caked on makeup, put a little eyeliner and lipstick go a long way. Also nicely done hair. And shaved legs. Earrings are weird though, but that's just me.

You just described a nice, even 10%. See what I mean?


So what you're saying is... you have no idea what you're talking about and making vague guesses based on being shot down by girls out of your league. Nice.

Not true at all. I haven't ever asked anyone out.


I don't think you understand how much effort it takes to look good. You need to match your outfits, buy clothing that is the right fit--which is going to be overly tight, thin, and expensive, not to mention outdated in a year--get the right kind of makeup, eat nothing, exercise all the time, and outclass other girls so that you can be the Suzie Q to Johnny Smith.
There's so much pressure for girls to be hot and so much effort that goes into it that it's absurd. It's not just a natural thing.


>There's so much pressure for girls to be hot and so much effort that goes into it that it's absurd. It's not just a natural thing.
Funny how almost no guy will give a sh*t about girls being caked in make-up though, right? I swear they just do it for other girls.


Your whorishness sickens me.
I think we're even.

Is this the part where I get mad and pull out the 'you don't know me' line? lol, oh you.


So are you saying there's no such thing as natural beauty?
Or are you saying that with enough makeup and nice clothes even an average girl can look amazing?
Because it's that's the case the girl in OP's comic doesn't have much of an excuse, does she?
Seriously, I can tell I'll never be able to convince you of this, but as long as you're not a hambeast, 90% of the sh*t you do to look pretty guys don't care about. Girls do that to compete with other girls. We don't care.

So you're saying girls with good genes are bitches because they go for guys with good genes, but you as a less attractive being don't get picked by them for mating? That's a little silly, given that you want to f**k the hot girls but not the ugly ones. I have three questions for you:
1) What's your height?
2) What's your weight?
3) Are you an introvert or an extrovert?
If it's okay for you to care about how a girl looks, and reject her on the basis of her looks, it should be okay for her to do so with you too. Given that, your rage should come from the fact that you're attractive but for some reason girls don't find themselves attracted to you anyway.
Let's see if that hypothesis is correct.

ITT:
>I know a few bitches and wh**res, therefore all women are bitches and wh**res.
>Men are shallow, women aren't shallow
>Women are shallow, men aren't shallow.
>Only men can be lonely.
>I know a few women that are attracted to X, therefore all women are attracted to X.
>I know a few men that are attracted to X, therefore all men are attracted to X.

I'll summarize:
ITT:
> inane generalizations


>You just need to look average and you'll get sex and eventually a few boyfriends.
Not the point. People tend to want sex and be in relationships with people they find attractive, not the people desperate enough to have sex with anybody.

>People tend to want sex and be in relationships with people they find attractive
manslation:
>"BAWWWWWWWW! THE 8/10 and 9/10 don't want to f**k me! Only the disgusting 5/10 and 6/10 guys! Even though I'm a 5/10 myself! EWWWWWWW! THEY'RE SO DISGUSTING!"
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORE

Men generally have much lower standards than women, though. Yeah, I find the stereotypical big-boobed bleach blond wh**re attractive in a purely sexual way. I'd probably f**k her, but that's it. But I see every day on campus hundreds of hot girls that I would readily have sex with and who aren't NEAR as "hot" as that stereotype.
I don't get why women all feel like they have to conform to a single stereotype of how they should look, because they don't. You don't have to be a perfect 10 for us to want to f**k you. And even then, just because we're sexually attracted to some huge-fake-boobed-tan-blond wh**re doesn't mean we suddenly want her as a girlfriend.


Not true at all. I haven't ever asked anyone out.

Oh! so you truly don't know what you're talking about. That's cool too.


Not true at all. I haven't ever asked anyone out.

>never put himself out there
>angry about women being shallow wh**res
oh, anonymous


Not true at all. I haven't ever asked anyone out.

So now you're admitting that you have no experience with any of this and are therefor talking out of your ass?
You and your crazy creationist logic.


I'll summarize:
ITT:
> inane generalizations

Thankyou very much. Now I'm afraid I'll have to leave this thread... the idiocy stinks to high heaven.


So you're saying girls with good genes are bitches because they go for guys with good genes, but you as a less attractive being don't get picked by them for mating? That's a little silly, given that you want to f**k the hot girls but not the ugly ones. I have three questions for you:
1) What's your height?
2) What's your weight?
3) Are you an introvert or an extrovert?
If it's okay for you to care about how a girl looks, and reject her on the basis of her looks, it should be okay for her to do so with you too. Given that, your rage should come from the fact that you're attractive but for some reason girls don't find themselves attracted to you anyway.
Let's see if that hypothesis is correct.

ALL I'm saying is that women don't have to work as hard as men to get mates. I don't give a f**k about the other sh*t you're babbling about.


>People tend to want sex and be in relationships with people they find attractive
manslation:
>"BAWWWWWWWW! THE 8/10 and 9/10 don't want to f**k me! Only the disgusting 5/10 and 6/10 guys! Even though I'm a 5/10 myself! EWWWWWWW! THEY'RE SO DISGUSTING!"
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORE

>"BAWWWWWWWW! THE 8/10 and 9/10 don't want to f**k me! Only the disgusting 5/10 and 6/10 guys! Even though I'm a 5/10 myself! EWWWWWWW! THEY'RE SO DISGUSTING!"
If you say so, dude. Some of us get no attention from anyone.


Oh! so you truly don't know what you're talking about. That's cool too.


>never put himself out there
>angry about women being shallow wh**res
oh, anonymous


So now you're admitting that you have no experience with any of this and are therefor talking out of your ass?
You and your crazy creationist logic.

Can you please stop sleeping with so many men you silly wh**res?

Men generally have much lower standards than women, though. Yeah, I find the stereotypical big-boobed bleach blond wh**re attractive in a purely sexual way. I'd probably f**k her, but that's it. But I see every day on campus hundreds of hot girls that I would readily have sex with and who aren't NEAR as "hot" as that stereotype.
I don't get why women all feel like they have to conform to a single stereotype of how they should look, because they don't. You don't have to be a perfect 10 for us to want to f**k you. And even then, just because we're sexually attracted to some huge-fake-boobed-tan-blond wh**re doesn't mean we suddenly want her as a girlfriend.

And it's the same way with girls towards guys, too. Work on yourself a bit and you'll be okay.
However, guys are a little more consistent in what they want of girls. Girls are just all over the place in their preferences.



Can you please stop sleeping with so many men you silly wh**res?

Wait, what? You quoted me assuming I was a girl and then also completely ignored my point.
You're creepy and weird.



Can you please stop sleeping with so many men you silly wh**res?

This guy. Lol
Is thie Daina? It must be.


And it's the same way with girls towards guys, too. Work on yourself a bit and you'll be okay.
However, guys are a little more consistent in what they want of girls. Girls are just all over the place in their preferences.

>However, guys are a little more consistent in what they want of girls. Girls are just all over the place in their preferences.
DING DING DING DING!!! WE HAVE A WINNER, FOLKS. TELL HER WHAT SHE'S WON.


Wait, what? You quoted me assuming I was a girl and then also completely ignored my point.
You're creepy and weird.

>You're creepy and weird.
Only girls use words like 'creepy'. You're a girl.

HI I'M A FATASS NECKBEARD WHO'S NEVER TOUCHED A WOMAN
HI I'M A FATASS FUGMO GIRL WHO'S NEVER TOUCHED A MAN
NOW WE'RE GONNA ARGUE OVER OUR LACK OF EXPERIENCE WITH THE OPPOSITE SEX UNDER THE GUISE OF ACTUALLY BEING EXPERIENCED
F**KSH*TDICKS.


And it's the same way with girls towards guys, too. Work on yourself a bit and you'll be okay.
However, guys are a little more consistent in what they want of girls. Girls are just all over the place in their preferences.

>Work on yourself a bit and you'll be okay.
Whereas all you have to do as a woman is... NOTHING! Unless you're naturally ugly, which I'll be the first to admit most people aren't.
Can you see that women have it easier now?


And it's the same way with girls towards guys, too. Work on yourself a bit and you'll be okay.
However, guys are a little more consistent in what they want of girls. Girls are just all over the place in their preferences.

They're not all over the place, they just want the best looking guys bar none.
Can females leave anonymous anyway?
We don't want you here, you're not one of us.

Men generally have much lower standards than women, though. Yeah, I find the stereotypical big-boobed bleach blond wh**re attractive in a purely sexual way. I'd probably f**k her, but that's it. But I see every day on campus hundreds of hot girls that I would readily have sex with and who aren't NEAR as "hot" as that stereotype.
I don't get why women all feel like they have to conform to a single stereotype of how they should look, because they don't. You don't have to be a perfect 10 for us to want to f**k you. And even then, just because we're sexually attracted to some huge-fake-boobed-tan-blond wh**re doesn't mean we suddenly want her as a girlfriend.

A man can f**k a women each day and have 9*30 sons in 9 months.
A woman can f**k 10 men if she wants in 1 day, but when pregnancy hits, she can have 1 son in 9 month.
So women are supposed to have 9*30 times higher standards than men.

Notice how the only way females can win an argument is by changing what's been said entirely and luring the bitterf**s onto arguements they can't win but are prone to fight.
We still aren't any closer to a consensus on the whole "women say they want nerdy guys and act like nerdy guys go for 10s instead of them, isn't it weird how this never f**king happens?" thing.



Can you please stop sleeping with so many men you silly wh**res?

I'm one of the people you quoted. I'm a man. I have a penis. I am not a misogynist. I know you think this is impossible, but it's true. Stop calling me a woman, it's annoying.


A man can f**k a women each day and have 9*30 sons in 9 months.
A woman can f**k 10 men if she wants in 1 day, but when pregnancy hits, she can have 1 son in 9 month.
So women are supposed to have 9*30 times higher standards than men.

Thus, women who sleep around are wh**res. See?


They're not all over the place, they just want the best looking guys bar none.
Can females leave anonymous anyway?
We don't want you here, you're not one of us.

See the study in

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090626153511.htm
Sorry sweet cheeks, you're a primate just like the rest of us.

Also:
HI I'M A FATASS NECKBEARD WHO'S NEVER TOUCHED A WOMAN
HI I'M A FATASS FUGMO GIRL WHO'S NEVER TOUCHED A MAN
NOW WE'RE GONNA ARGUE OVER OUR LACK OF EXPERIENCE WITH THE OPPOSITE SEX UNDER THE GUISE OF ACTUALLY BEING EXPERIENCED
F**KSH*TDICKS.

This. You people are all subhuman.


And it's the same way with girls towards guys, too. Work on yourself a bit and you'll be okay.
However, guys are a little more consistent in what they want of girls. Girls are just all over the place in their preferences.

No, it generally doesn't. I know many 6 or 7s I would gladly rail the sh*t out of. A girl doesn't have to be a perfect 10 for me to be sexually attracted to her, is what I'm saying.
And I appreciate your concern, but I already am. Don't assume everyone who hates all women is a basement-dwelling neckbeard.


Thus, women who sleep around are wh**res. See?

Only if they're getting paid.
Hurrrr.

Notice how the only way females can win an argument is by changing what's been said entirely and luring the bitterf**s onto arguements they can't win but are prone to fight.
We still aren't any closer to a consensus on the whole "women say they want nerdy guys and act like nerdy guys go for 10s instead of them, isn't it weird how this never f**king happens?" thing.

This doesn't happen, and I never said it did. But I'm not a wh**re. I'm not defending 'baww, boys dont like me' I'm defending my integrity.

Notice how the only way females can win an argument is by changing what's been said entirely and luring the bitterf**s onto arguements they can't win but are prone to fight.
We still aren't any closer to a consensus on the whole "women say they want nerdy guys and act like nerdy guys go for 10s instead of them, isn't it weird how this never f**king happens?" thing.

As it turns out, nobody goes for fat and ugly people, such as yourself and the author of the comic.

I'm one of the people you quoted. I'm a man. I have a penis. I am not a misogynist. I know you think this is impossible, but it's true. Stop calling me a woman, it's annoying.

He quoted me and I'm a dude too! I guess we're friends now.


Thus, women who sleep around are wh**res. See?

Not the person you quoted, but humans don't use sex solely for procreation. See: bonobo's the species closest to humans. They also use sex as a social tool.


No, it generally doesn't. I know many 6 or 7s I would gladly rail the sh*t out of. A girl doesn't have to be a perfect 10 for me to be sexually attracted to her, is what I'm saying.
And I appreciate your concern, but I already am. Don't assume everyone who hates all women is a basement-dwelling neckbeard.

It's not a matter of being a perfect 10. It's a matter of men being able to consistently agree on what's "more" and "less" attractive such that we can even rate sh*t.


This doesn't happen, and I never said it did. But I'm not a wh**re. I'm not defending 'baww, boys dont like me' I'm defending my integrity.

So you came into a thread about something completely different only to bring up the entirely irrelevent issue of your own integrity?
Attention wh**re much?


This doesn't happen, and I never said it did. But I'm not a wh**re. I'm not defending 'baww, boys dont like me' I'm defending my integrity.

Females don't have integrity. They're all soulless wh**res. I know it's your nature to deny it, but if you started admitting it you might find men will respect you more.

Notice how the only way females can win an argument is by changing what's been said entirely and luring the bitterf**s onto arguements they can't win but are prone to fight.
We still aren't any closer to a consensus on the whole "women say they want nerdy guys and act like nerdy guys go for 10s instead of them, isn't it weird how this never f**king happens?" thing.

Nerdy guy in this typical context means dudes with hipster-like interests and style. It's a fact and doesn't depend on consensus. You don't perceive them as nerdy, the girls do, and thus we a have a discontinuity in communication and misunderstandings ensue.


So you came into a thread about something completely different only to bring up the entirely irrelevent issue of your own integrity?
Attention wh**re much?

Nah, stopped by because these threads are always funny :]

Why is everyone assuming that everyone who doesn't hate women in these threads is a female? I'm pretty sure statistically speaking it works out that a lot of us are dudes, too. At least I know I am.


Nah, stopped by because these threads are always funny :]

So yes.

Why is everyone assuming that everyone who doesn't hate women in these threads is a female? I'm pretty sure statistically speaking it works out that a lot of us are dudes, too. At least I know I am.

You're a good man, Charlie Brown.

Notice how the only way females can win an argument is by changing what's been said entirely and luring the bitterf**s onto arguements they can't win but are prone to fight.
We still aren't any closer to a consensus on the whole "women say they want nerdy guys and act like nerdy guys go for 10s instead of them, isn't it weird how this never f**king happens?" thing.

What a girl means by "nerdy" is not what you mean by "nerdy".
It's like if you said you liked a girl with big tits and suddenly a whale with 64D tits comes rolling towards you. I mean, yeah, she's got a huge rack...but there's all kinds of other horrible things there too.


It's not a matter of being a perfect 10. It's a matter of men being able to consistently agree on what's "more" and "less" attractive such that we can even rate sh*t.

Just because there's someone more attractive doesn't mean I still wouldn't f**k the less attractive one.


I know. The funniest thing is the '90% of women sleep with 10% of men' statistic anonymous loves so much.
People, do the math. That's not even f**king possible with a 50-50 division of men and women in a population.


http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/10/13/1191696214489.html
Okay, so New Zealand women like to f**k around a lot. My point in pasting this is:
"New Zealand was the only country where women were more promiscuous than their men, who averaged 16.8 sexual partners, The Press newspaper said, reporting the survey."

It's possible.
10% of men are godlike at getting exactly what they want from women. So much so that they can go through the 90% statistic (not sure where it's from, but it's certainly possible)
Secondly I would not be suprised if men on average, have more sexual partners than women (see above). But, then, I would be suprised if there were more male virgins then female ones. See, those men who make up the 'average' male who has '10+' sexual partners in whatever time frame? They are the 10%. The other 90% are excluded in the statistic because they cannot participate or are pulled up by the fantastic performance of the other men.
It's just like the feminist 'Women get paid less than men' bullsh*t, yes, there are more males at the high end. But there are also more males on the low end of the wage scale. There are more male millionaires than female sure, but there are also a sh*t load more male hobo's than female ones. And I don't f**king see women lining up to debate the justice of that.


So yes.

So instead I'm supposed to just lol at you guys with no female experience talking about stuff you don't know? oh you as well.

Why do women have such bad taste in movies?


Females don't have integrity. They're all soulless wh**res. I know it's your nature to deny it, but if you started admitting it you might find men will respect you more.

The only thing that actually still irritates me about you misogynist troll wannabes is that you spew unsubstantiated claims over and over again. The mere factual inaccuracy, sweeping generalisations, absence of logic and the pretense of scientific rationality while actually opposing its very core values, rigor, falsifiability and testability, are what I cannot stand about you lot.



It's possible.
10% of men are godlike at getting exactly what they want from women. So much so that they can go through the 90% statistic (not sure where it's from, but it's certainly possible)
Secondly I would not be suprised if men on average, have more sexual partners than women (see above). But, then, I would be suprised if there were more male virgins then female ones. See, those men who make up the 'average' male who has '10+' sexual partners in whatever time frame? They are the 10%. The other 90% are excluded in the statistic because they cannot participate or are pulled up by the fantastic performance of the other men.
It's just like the feminist 'Women get paid less than men' bullsh*t, yes, there are more males at the high end. But there are also more males on the low end of the wage scale. There are more male millionaires than female sure, but there are also a sh*t load more male hobo's than female ones. And I don't f**king see women lining up to debate the justice of that.

A desperate woman can turn to the streets if that's what it takes to get shelter. Prostitution happens. Also, the issue with women being paid less than men isn't the overall wage distribution, it's that for a man and woman with equivalent amounts of labor and skill the man will be paid much more. That's where the injustice happens.

Why do women have such bad taste in movies?

Hm. Because it's an opinion and yours differs from mine? That's fine, no one likes my taste in movies.


The only thing that actually still irritates me about you misogynist troll wannabes is that you spew unsubstantiated claims over and over again. The mere factual inaccuracy, sweeping generalisations, absence of logic and the pretense of scientific rationality while actually opposing its very core values, rigor, falsifiability and testability, are what I cannot stand about you lot.

>pretense of scientific rationality
"Gender is a social construct"
Entirely scientifically valid, right? lmao.

no one likes the nerd girl/caring types


A desperate woman can turn to the streets if that's what it takes to get shelter. Prostitution happens. Also, the issue with women being paid less than men isn't the overall wage distribution, it's that for a man and woman with equivalent amounts of labor and skill the man will be paid much more. That's where the injustice happens.

lol no, it's because women tend to take lower paying jobs (teachers, nurses) and men tend to take higher-paying jobs (doctors, lawyers). On top of that, if a woman has a child her ability to work is severely limited.

Why do women have such bad taste in movies?

Why do men only like movies that have tits and guns and explosions?
Why do women only like movies that have men with big arms cuddling women?
Oh right it's because everyone has sh*t taste in movies and society reinforces retarded cultural values for both genders.

>pretense of scientific rationality
"Gender is a social construct"
Entirely scientifically valid, right? lmao.

Yes, in fact, it is! If a female infant is dressed in blue, people will give her toy trucks and tools. If a male infant is dressed in pink, people will give him dolls. Funny how that works, huh?

Why do women have such bad taste in movies?

Because they don't have a mind of their own and thus tend to like popular things. And we all know how sh*tty most popular movies are.


Why do men only like movies that have tits and guns and explosions?
Why do women only like movies that have men with big arms cuddling women?
Oh right it's because everyone has sh*t taste in movies and society reinforces retarded cultural values for both genders.

Yes, in fact, it is! If a female infant is dressed in blue, people will give her toy trucks and tools. If a male infant is dressed in pink, people will give him dolls. Funny how that works, huh?

I played with dump trucks when I was a kid D: what're you saying?



It's possible.
10% of men are godlike at getting exactly what they want from women. So much so that they can go through the 90% statistic (not sure where it's from, but it's certainly possible)
Secondly I would not be suprised if men on average, have more sexual partners than women (see above). But, then, I would be suprised if there were more male virgins then female ones. See, those men who make up the 'average' male who has '10+' sexual partners in whatever time frame? They are the 10%. The other 90% are excluded in the statistic because they cannot participate or are pulled up by the fantastic performance of the other men.
It's just like the feminist 'Women get paid less than men' bullsh*t, yes, there are more males at the high end. But there are also more males on the low end of the wage scale. There are more male millionaires than female sure, but there are also a sh*t load more male hobo's than female ones. And I don't f**king see women lining up to debate the justice of that.

>not sure where it's from, but it's certainly possible
anonymous made it up. Literally, it was never sourced, they just said that was the case.


>pretense of scientific rationality
"Gender is a social construct"
Entirely scientifically valid, right? lmao.

Doesn't that depend on the definition of 'gender'? The way I see it, in gender studies the very word 'gender' is taken to mean the social construct as opposed to a biological feature.
Anyway, I'm no advocate of gender studies, so please don't attempt to read any claims related to that into my posts.


Why do men only like movies that have tits and guns and explosions?
Why do women only like movies that have men with big arms cuddling women?
Oh right it's because everyone has sh*t taste in movies and society reinforces retarded cultural values for both genders.

Yes, in fact, it is! If a female infant is dressed in blue, people will give her toy trucks and tools. If a male infant is dressed in pink, people will give him dolls. Funny how that works, huh?

>If a female infant is dressed in blue, people will give her toy trucks and tools. If a male infant is dressed in pink, people will give him dolls. Funny how that works, huh?
You're a sociology f**ktard aren't you?
It's like you've completely ignored the past 30 years of neurology or something.
"The nature-nurture debate is over. . . . All human behavioral traits are heritable."
- Eric Turkheimer


lol no, it's because women tend to take lower paying jobs (teachers, nurses) and men tend to take higher-paying jobs (doctors, lawyers). On top of that, if a woman has a child her ability to work is severely limited.

Certain jobs are deemed appropriate for certain genders. Notice that women are encouraged to take secretary and nurse jobs while men are encouraged to take lawyer and doctor jobs. The women's jobs in that case are lower-paying because they're lower skill, but there's also a stigma against men taking secretary and nurse jobs just like there's some stigma against women taking "manlier" jobs.
That said, what you said was irrelevant. I'm saying that if a man and a woman had identical resumes and interviewed just as well as one another for the same job, and both of them got it, the woman would be paid less on average.


Doesn't that depend on the definition of 'gender'? The way I see it, in gender studies the very word 'gender' is taken to mean the social construct as opposed to a biological feature.
Anyway, I'm no advocate of gender studies, so please don't attempt to read any claims related to that into my posts.

>gender studies
>scientific
This is why nobody takes sluts seriously.


I played with dump trucks when I was a kid D: what're you saying?

I'm saying your wardrobe had a lot of blue in it, of course.


I'm saying your wardrobe had a lot of blue in it, of course.

mostly green, lmao


Why do men only like movies that have tits and guns and explosions?
Why do women only like movies that have men with big arms cuddling women?
Oh right it's because everyone has sh*t taste in movies and society reinforces retarded cultural values for both genders.

Yes, in fact, it is! If a female infant is dressed in blue, people will give her toy trucks and tools. If a male infant is dressed in pink, people will give him dolls. Funny how that works, huh?

>society reinforces retarded cultural values for both genders.
"It's society's fault" is exactly the kind of bullsh*t response I'd expect for a leftist with no sense of personal responsibility.
Let me guess, the state should get involved to 'rectify' this with social engineering projects right?


Why do men only like movies that have tits and guns and explosions?
Why do women only like movies that have men with big arms cuddling women?
Oh right it's because everyone has sh*t taste in movies and society reinforces retarded cultural values for both genders.

Yes, in fact, it is! If a female infant is dressed in blue, people will give her toy trucks and tools. If a male infant is dressed in pink, people will give him dolls. Funny how that works, huh?

>Oh right it's because everyone has sh*t taste in movies and society reinforces retarded cultural values for both genders.
This. Popular things are popular because the majority of people like them.


>gender studies
>scientific
This is why nobody takes sluts seriously.

DUDE
DID YOU EVEN READ MY POST
I MAD


>society reinforces retarded cultural values for both genders.
"It's society's fault" is exactly the kind of bullsh*t response I'd expect for a leftist with no sense of personal responsibility.
Let me guess, the state should get involved to 'rectify' this with social engineering projects right?

They did it with civil rights, didn't they?


Certain jobs are deemed appropriate for certain genders. Notice that women are encouraged to take secretary and nurse jobs while men are encouraged to take lawyer and doctor jobs. The women's jobs in that case are lower-paying because they're lower skill, but there's also a stigma against men taking secretary and nurse jobs just like there's some stigma against women taking "manlier" jobs.
That said, what you said was irrelevant. I'm saying that if a man and a woman had identical resumes and interviewed just as well as one another for the same job, and both of them got it, the woman would be paid less on average.

Show me proof please, or it's all in your mind.


They did it with civil rights, didn't they?

Don't even f**king compare that. Civil rights was one group actively oppressing the other. What you're talking about is largely irrelevant and bullsh*t.


They did it with civil rights, didn't they?

What do you mean? 'Civil Rights' didn't get rid of human tribal thinking, you need only need look at neighborhood/school demographic trends over the past 40 years to see that.
Are you seriously suggesting the state start a social engineering project to 'overcome' these 'problems'? (i.e. human nature).
I mean, is that seriously what you're suggesting? Why are women so f**king THICK?


Show me proof please, or it's all in your mind.

OH GOD I KNOW THIS ONE!
F**k!

Can I just jump into this argument somewhere?
I don't want to read this whole thread.
Also bitches and wh**res.


Don't even f**king compare that. Civil rights was one group actively oppressing the other. What you're talking about is largely irrelevant and bullsh*t.

Not really, civil rights were basically private property rights. As far as I'm concerned a private property owner can discriminate as much as he f**king wants, if he wants to hire all asians, or all whites, all blacks or even all pygmies that's his damn choice. The business will succeed or fail off the back of his choices as a property owner.


Show me proof please, or it's all in your mind.

http://www.iwpr.org/pdf/WageRatioPress_release8-27-04.pdf
http://journals.aomonline.org/inpress/main.asp?action=preview&art_id=610&p_id=1&p_short=
AMJ

this whole thread...
>implying guy-nerd comics aren't equally retarded
also, as unrealistic and ridiculous as the OP's comic is, I do like the depiction of the huge-breasted slut


Not really, civil rights were basically private property rights. As far as I'm concerned a private property owner can discriminate as much as he f**king wants, if he wants to hire all asians, or all whites, all blacks or even all pygmies that's his damn choice. The business will succeed or fail off the back of his choices as a property owner.

Oh right, you're an internet right-winger.
lol


>If a female infant is dressed in blue, people will give her toy trucks and tools. If a male infant is dressed in pink, people will give him dolls. Funny how that works, huh?
You're a sociology f**ktard aren't you?
It's like you've completely ignored the past 30 years of neurology or something.
"The nature-nurture debate is over. . . . All human behavioral traits are heritable."
- Eric Turkheimer

oh sh*t, Eric Turkheimer! All opposing viewpoints null and void!


Oh right, you're an internet right-winger.
lol

That's not an intelligent response, it's just mud throwing. We all know women follow the default trends, be it voting for liberal candidates or going on 'protest marches'. It's not because you're any more intelligent than anyone else, it's because you're a lemming who does whatever is considered to be trendy and fashionable.
Now, a proper rebuttal please, you silly girl.

this whole thread...
>implying guy-nerd comics aren't equally retarded
also, as unrealistic and ridiculous as the OP's comic is, I do like the depiction of the huge-breasted slut

>the huge-breasted slut
I'd bang her.


The point he's making is that there's more male chubby chasers than female, because men appreciate a wider variety of looks in a woman.
Women all want the same looking guy. No matter how many say they like their skinny or effeminate guys, they'd all f**k the dude in that one chatroulette gif in a heartbeat.
Someone will know what I'm talking about, it's the one where the guy managed to get 3 girls to get naked on cam and masturbate with the same f**king gif.
In b4 I'd do the same, I'f run into tons of hot women masturbating and not once did I f**king strip and wank on cam.

Can anyone link this legendary chatroulette gif that gets the girls, want to see if he's as hot as you say


Oh right, you're an internet right-winger.
lol

how to read an internet right-winger's posts:
replace everything they say with "private property no taxes private property individualism gun rights no taxes socialism ugngnghghg"
same thing they already say, just clarified a little


tough guy

Somehow not surprised that made it past the xes...
On a note more closely related to the thread, I would never hook up with either of the nerd girls because although I'm on the 4chonz a lot, I'm not a /v/idya or anime freak (believe it or not, web Gold Member accounts don't require that you watch hentai), and I don't particularly care for nerd girls; they tend to have bad hygiene, and even the ones that are presentable are endless fountains of meme, japanish*t, and baww. And don't even get me started on getting one of these chicks drunk, because then it gets more meme and less normal, and if I can't trust that you can have a normal conversation with a friend of mine, there is NO F**KING WAY I'm going to hang out with you, let alone introduce you to my friends.


That's not an intelligent response, it's just mud throwing. We all know women follow the default trends, be it voting for liberal candidates or going on 'protest marches'. It's not because you're any more intelligent than anyone else, it's because you're a lemming who does whatever is considered to be trendy and fashionable.
Now, a proper rebuttal please, you silly girl.

>We all know women follow the default trends, be it voting for liberal candidates or going on 'protest marches'.
Most people do. Regardless of gender. Hipsters, remember? Hipsters are men too.


oh sh*t, Eric Turkheimer! All opposing viewpoints null and void!

Actually, even advocates of the nurture side accept that nature plays a major role now, see the Snyderman-Rothman study for example. Consider that 40 years ago leftists thought that human beings were blank slates with no pre-programmed genetic code, a lot of them even believed in soviet lysenkoism even, that asserted 'genes are an artificial construct and do not exist'.
For the past 40 years they've been pushed back, little by little, because the simple fact is, the more we learn about genes and neurology and psychometrics, the more we realize how innate our pre-programming actually is.
But you carry on believing in Boasian cranial plasticity and other pseudoscientific nonsense.


>We all know women follow the default trends, be it voting for liberal candidates or going on 'protest marches'.
Most people do. Regardless of gender. Hipsters, remember? Hipsters are men too.

Haha, indeed! The mass following is what makes them trends.


That's not an intelligent response, it's just mud throwing. We all know women follow the default trends, be it voting for liberal candidates or going on 'protest marches'. It's not because you're any more intelligent than anyone else, it's because you're a lemming who does whatever is considered to be trendy and fashionable.
Now, a proper rebuttal please, you silly girl.

>mud throwing
>stereotypes
>silly girl
Nice work thinking I'm a girl.

Can anyone link this legendary chatroulette gif that gets the girls, want to see if he's as hot as you say

I wanna see too.


>We all know women follow the default trends, be it voting for liberal candidates or going on 'protest marches'.
Most people do. Regardless of gender. Hipsters, remember? Hipsters are men too.

I think it's more pronounced with women because of the maternal instinct. They believe the state should be something of a surrogate mother for people, catering to their every whim from cradle to grave.

how to read an internet right-winger's posts:
replace everything they say with "private property no taxes private property individualism gun rights no taxes socialism ugngnghghg"
same thing they already say, just clarified a little

It's more Libertarians who bring up private property rights than 'right wingers' to be honest. As for gun rights, I'm a big believer in them, though that's because I live in a disarmed country like the UK where the criminals have guns but the average citizen doesn't. Yep, that worked out really well.


http://www.iwpr.org/pdf/WageRatioPress_release8-27-04.pdf
http://journals.aomonline.org/inpress/main.asp?action=preview&art_id=610&p_id=1&p_short=
AMJ

>median annual earnings for women
>median
That's what I'm f**king talking about. Nowhere does it say anything about having the same job with the same skills. It's talking about the median of the population - and there is a SIGNIFICANT portion of women who take low-paying jobs like an elementary-school teacher or a nurse.
I can't view the second article, but I'm sure it's the same bullsh*t.


Women are wh**res because more often than not they go for the man who hurts them. They want an alpha male, not a nice guy, and that's f**ked up.

>implying alpha males can't be good guys
News flash, baww fa**ots; Alpha male does not mean douchebag. Alpha males exude confidence; douchebags are self-conscious, which is why they are NOT alpha males. Alpha males don't treat women like sh*t, they treat women exactly the way they deserve to be treated, and for most young women who haven't grown out of being total bitches, they deserve to be treated like bitches (i.e. not to be trusted, handled with kid gloves, condescended to). Get to know a woman objectively before bawwing about how awesome she is and doesn't deserve what she's getting.


>median annual earnings for women
>median
That's what I'm f**king talking about. Nowhere does it say anything about having the same job with the same skills. It's talking about the median of the population - and there is a SIGNIFICANT portion of women who take low-paying jobs like an elementary-school teacher or a nurse.
I can't view the second article, but I'm sure it's the same bullsh*t.

The second one shows that when comparing a black man, a white woman, and a white man reading the same script, all people find the white man to sound more competent and want to buy from him and sh*t.
Basically, society reinforces that white men are the best, thus white men become in demand and are paid more.


http://www.iwpr.org/pdf/WageRatioPress_release8-27-04.pdf
http://journals.aomonline.org/inpress/main.asp?action=preview&art_id=610&p_id=1&p_short=
AMJ

Are you seriously suggesting that women are paid less for doing the same job? Because that was debunked a long time ago. I'll give you an example of what the leftists used to claim:
"Female lawyers are paid less than male lawyers for doing the same job."
Not true. Demonstrably not true. They simple took the median average earnings for men and women in the -legal sector- and compared them, without realizing most men in the legal sector were lawyers, whereas most women were paralegals.


The second one shows that when comparing a black man, a white woman, and a white man reading the same script, all people find the white man to sound more competent and want to buy from him and sh*t.
Basically, society reinforces that white men are the best, thus white men become in demand and are paid more.

>society reinforces that white men are the best
loooool.
You really do believe there is some omnipotent, omnipresent white, male entity responsible for all your problems and the problems of every self styled 'victim group' don't you?
Why is sociology such a useless, sh*tty subject?


The second one shows that when comparing a black man, a white woman, and a white man reading the same script, all people find the white man to sound more competent and want to buy from him and sh*t.
Basically, society reinforces that white men are the best, thus white men become in demand and are paid more.

Well that's just because blacks and women can't read.


>society reinforces that white men are the best
loooool.
You really do believe there is some omnipotent, omnipresent white, male entity responsible for all your problems and the problems of every self styled 'victim group' don't you?
Why is sociology such a useless, sh*tty subject?

No, I believe that the silly biases of millions of people imprint themelves upon those people's children, thus perpetuating a pretty stupid situation.
Just because it isn't what you believe doesn't mean it's not true. I mean hell, you're a libertarian--you should be used to contradicting established facts when stating your beliefs.


The second one shows that when comparing a black man, a white woman, and a white man reading the same script, all people find the white man to sound more competent and want to buy from him and sh*t.
Basically, society reinforces that white men are the best, thus white men become in demand and are paid more.

So you concede my point on the first one?


So if men are up front about it, does that make it okay?
Are you saying women should actually be unashamed about the manipulation and other sh*t of which you accuse them?

well, it certainly would make things easier on your part if you were up front and honest with the guy; example: OP's cartoon. If the girl liked the guy, she could have told him; then the guy could either go "ok, I like you too", or he would say "No, you're a dirty c**t, I'd rather sniff glue". Either way, you know where you stand, unless the guy is an enormous baww fa**ot who doesn't know what he wants (i.e. most of the members of this board); then you're truly screwed, because I'm convinced no woman will ever be good enough to make the boys in this thread happy. At any rate, honesty has always been the best policy (as far as I've seen), and it gets you a lot more than hinting and vague assertions.


I think it's more pronounced with women because of the maternal instinct. They believe the state should be something of a surrogate mother for people, catering to their every whim from cradle to grave.

It's more Libertarians who bring up private property rights than 'right wingers' to be honest. As for gun rights, I'm a big believer in them, though that's because I live in a disarmed country like the UK where the criminals have guns but the average citizen doesn't. Yep, that worked out really well.

Or perhaps women tend to be more libertarian because the whole women's rights movement was libertarian?
>I think it's more pronounced with women because of the maternal instinct. They believe the state should be something of a surrogate mother for people, catering to their every whim from cradle to grave.


>mud throwing
>stereotypes
>silly girl
Nice work thinking I'm a girl.

I wanna see too.

to be fair, you do sound retarded.


No, I believe that the silly biases of millions of people imprint themelves upon those people's children, thus perpetuating a pretty stupid situation.
Just because it isn't what you believe doesn't mean it's not true. I mean hell, you're a libertarian--you should be used to contradicting established facts when stating your beliefs.

>I believe that the silly biases of millions of people imprint themelves upon those people's children, thus perpetuating a pretty stupid situation.
This is up to you to demonstrate. Unequal outcomes prove f**k all, particularly given the evidence concerning the heritability of intelligence. You can't just make wild outlandish statements without providing evidence, particularly given that your entire belief structure is based upon the now defunct tabula rasa model of cognitive development.
>you're a libertarian
Not an orthodox Libertarian. I don't believe for example states have a tendency to grow large, as Rothbard did, unless they are coupled with Universal suffrage, for reasons that were brought up by the classical liberals like Mill.
You see, people like me are independent thinkers, we're constantly critiquing what we believe in an attempt to refine our beliefs.
People like you are religious believers in egalitarianism. No amount of evidence would be enough to convince you that your religious faith is misplaced.
"You can't get through to them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You can not change their mind even if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still can not change the basic perception and the logic of behavior."
- Ex KGB Agent Yuri Bezmenov


Or perhaps women tend to be more libertarian because the whole women's rights movement was libertarian?
>I think it's more pronounced with women because of the maternal instinct. They believe the state should be something of a surrogate mother for people, catering to their every whim from cradle to grave.

Nope, gender quotas are not Libertarian. Women's rights is about ensuring unfair advantages for women because they can't compete on a level playing field. To counter this they claim there is some tacit cabal of organized business interests working against them, termed a 'glass ceiling', of course, there's never been any evidence to suggest this exists, they just conjecture and repeat it over and over again until they internalize it and believe it's true as a matter of faith.

>Go for top 5% of guys
>Wonder why he f**ks you and dumps you/isn't interested immediately
Dumb females, here's another pic.

this made me baww

Athens, trollmaster extraordinaire.

Athens, trollmaster extraordinaire.

I think he's serious and therefore not a troll.


Nope, gender quotas are not Libertarian. Women's rights is about ensuring unfair advantages for women because they can't compete on a level playing field. To counter this they claim there is some tacit cabal of organized business interests working against them, termed a 'glass ceiling', of course, there's never been any evidence to suggest this exists, they just conjecture and repeat it over and over again until they internalize it and believe it's true as a matter of faith.

No, I mean actual women's rights. Stuff like universal suffrage at whatnot.


I think he's serious and therefore not a troll.

Isn't athens a she? Or does no one know this anymore.


No, I mean actual women's rights. Stuff like universal suffrage at whatnot.

Whoever said most Libertarians agree with universal suffrage? Universal suffrage will invariably lead to a state that grows and grows.

WHY CAN WE NOT JUST UNDERSTAND AND RESPECT EACH SEX?
WHY CAN MEN AND WOMEN NOT F**KING GET ALONG?
WHY CAN MEN NOT UNDERSTAND WOMEN?
WHY CAN WOMEN NOT UNDERSTAND MEN?
WHY CAN NEITHER ATTRACT THE OTHER WITHOUT MANIPULATION AND BULLSH*T?
GODDAMNIT, WHY WHY WHY?
KSAJRLKSDJFKSDJFLKSDJFKSDJFKDSJF.


>I believe that the silly biases of millions of people imprint themelves upon those people's children, thus perpetuating a pretty stupid situation.
This is up to you to demonstrate. Unequal outcomes prove f**k all, particularly given the evidence concerning the heritability of intelligence. You can't just make wild outlandish statements without providing evidence, particularly given that your entire belief structure is based upon the now defunct tabula rasa model of cognitive development.
>you're a libertarian
Not an orthodox Libertarian. I don't believe for example states have a tendency to grow large, as Rothbard did, unless they are coupled with Universal suffrage, for reasons that were brought up by the classical liberals like Mill.
You see, people like me are independent thinkers, we're constantly critiquing what we believe in an attempt to refine our beliefs.
People like you are religious believers in egalitarianism. No amount of evidence would be enough to convince you that your religious faith is misplaced.
"You can't get through to them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You can not change their mind even if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still can not change the basic perception and the logic of behavior."
- Ex KGB Agent Yuri Bezmenov

>No amount of evidence would be enough to convince you that your religious faith is misplaced.
Aren't you exactly like that with the whole 'women are bitches and wh**re' shtick though?


>No amount of evidence would be enough to convince you that your religious faith is misplaced.
Aren't you exactly like that with the whole 'women are bitches and wh**re' shtick though?

>Aren't you exactly like that with the whole 'women are bitches and wh**re' shtick though?
Introduce dispositive evidence and we'll see if we can change that.
As it stands, I don't believe women have particularly good taste.


>No amount of evidence would be enough to convince you that your religious faith is misplaced.
Aren't you exactly like that with the whole 'women are bitches and wh**re' shtick though?

No, because he has a few (discredited) studies behind him.


Whoever said most Libertarians agree with universal suffrage? Universal suffrage will invariably lead to a state that grows and grows.

But surely not having the right to vote is limitation on personal liberty, which is what libertarianism is supposed to be all about?

WHY CAN WE NOT JUST UNDERSTAND AND RESPECT EACH SEX?
WHY CAN MEN AND WOMEN NOT F**KING GET ALONG?
WHY CAN MEN NOT UNDERSTAND WOMEN?
WHY CAN WOMEN NOT UNDERSTAND MEN?
WHY CAN NEITHER ATTRACT THE OTHER WITHOUT MANIPULATION AND BULLSH*T?
GODDAMNIT, WHY WHY WHY?
KSAJRLKSDJFKSDJFLKSDJFKSDJFKDSJF.

Let's be friends. We can just ignore everyone's fa**otry and get drunk and play the vidya.


>Aren't you exactly like that with the whole 'women are bitches and wh**re' shtick though?
Introduce dispositive evidence and we'll see if we can change that.
As it stands, I don't believe women have particularly good taste.

Holy sh*t, athens. I thought you left.
I already had the cake and streamers.

I was an average looking girl in high school, and I was extremely quiet, shy, and nerdy, and not one guy ever chatted me up, ever. And I really wanted to have sex because it sounded awesome, but I wanted to do it with someone I trusted. Men only ever talk to me when I act more outgoing, so I guess the idea that if you're an average looking female, you'll get sex right away, is wrong. And don't give me the sh*t about walking into a bar and asking for sex, both genders can do that easily.


No, because he has a few (discredited) studies behind him.

>discredited
What studies are you referring to specifically and when have they been discredited?
Go on. Actually back up your claims, you f**king fundamentalist.


Whoever said most Libertarians agree with universal suffrage? Universal suffrage will invariably lead to a state that grows and grows.

I love you, athens. Libertarianism is plutocracy by another name, but at least you have the balls to admit it.

This thread makes me glad to be gay.


>Aren't you exactly like that with the whole 'women are bitches and wh**re' shtick though?
Introduce dispositive evidence and we'll see if we can change that.
As it stands, I don't believe women have particularly good taste.

>Introduce dispositive evidence and we'll see if we can change that.
I'm afraid I can give only anecdotal evidence. Then again, this entire thread is anecdotal evidence and generalizations to the max.
Though I will agree that most women have bad taste, but only because most people have bad taste.


>discredited
What studies are you referring to specifically and when have they been discredited?
Go on. Actually back up your claims, you f**king fundamentalist.

>athens calling somebody a fundamentalist
>lethal dose of hypocrisy


But surely not having the right to vote is limitation on personal liberty, which is what libertarianism is supposed to be all about?

>is limitation on personal liberty
It's a limitation on political rights. Which aren't the same as private property rights.
I'd say the trade off is worth it. As Mill argued that only taxpayers should vote, because if non-taxpayers voted, they would tend vote for lavish government spending. Besides, democracy encourages short term exploitation by default as there is no 'owner' of the country's capital stock, just caretakers who exploit it for 4 or 8 years without regards for the future value.
Of course, there's the argument that a bigger electorate leads to a greater check and balance, that's nonsense, it just leads to a more stupid electorate, and certainly not less Government power.
The results are there for you to see with your own eyes. Tax rates under this system of universal compulsory democracy make the economic load endured by serfs seem modest. Government debt has risen to breathtaking levels. Gold has been replaced by Government manufactured paper currency with a continually diminishing value. Every detail of private life, property, trade and contract is regulated by ever higher mountains of paper law (legislation). In the name of social, public or national security our caretakers 'protect' us from global warming and cooling, the extinction of animals and plants, from husbands and wives, parents and employers, poverty, disease, disaster, ignorance, prejudice, racism, sexism, homophobia and countless other public enemies and dangers.

I was an average looking girl in high school, and I was extremely quiet, shy, and nerdy, and not one guy ever chatted me up, ever. And I really wanted to have sex because it sounded awesome, but I wanted to do it with someone I trusted. Men only ever talk to me when I act more outgoing, so I guess the idea that if you're an average looking female, you'll get sex right away, is wrong. And don't give me the sh*t about walking into a bar and asking for sex, both genders can do that easily.

You really think an average looking bachelor can just walk into a bar and say "Who wants to f**k me?" without:
a.) getting the sh*t kicked out of him
b.) girls calling the police saying theres a "creeper" here
c.) getting laughed at.
If you do, you really have no idea what the f**k you're talking about.

does anybody imagine athens is that guy at a party who is quiet at first, but then anytime anybody says ANYTHING he starts arguing with them since he has spent literally all his time reading mountains of information to support his predetermined viewpoints, and it's just f**king never ending until finally no one at the party is talking anymore because he can counter everything they say with a counterargument until eventually people forget what the original point was and/or are too tired to keep pointing out problems, and athens is sitting there like "I won the party"


>is limitation on personal liberty
It's a limitation on political rights. Which aren't the same as private property rights.
I'd say the trade off is worth it. As Mill argued that only taxpayers should vote, because if non-taxpayers voted, they would tend vote for lavish government spending. Besides, democracy encourages short term exploitation by default as there is no 'owner' of the country's capital stock, just caretakers who exploit it for 4 or 8 years without regards for the future value.
Of course, there's the argument that a bigger electorate leads to a greater check and balance, that's nonsense, it just leads to a more stupid electorate, and certainly not less Government power.
The results are there for you to see with your own eyes. Tax rates under this system of universal compulsory democracy make the economic load endured by serfs seem modest. Government debt has risen to breathtaking levels. Gold has been replaced by Government manufactured paper currency with a continually diminishing value. Every detail of private life, property, trade and contract is regulated by ever higher mountains of paper law (legislation). In the name of social, public or national security our caretakers 'protect' us from global warming and cooling, the extinction of animals and plants, from husbands and wives, parents and employers, poverty, disease, disaster, ignorance, prejudice, racism, sexism, homophobia and countless other public enemies and dangers.

And also from people like you.
Just sayin'.


>athens calling somebody a fundamentalist
>lethal dose of hypocrisy

Glad to see you don't have anything to back up your assertions. : )

I love you, athens. Libertarianism is plutocracy by another name, but at least you have the balls to admit it.

Most social Libertarians won't 'admit' it because they approach Libertarianism from the social perspective, and they don't understand economics. I would argue it leads to the rise of natural elites, rather than 'plutocracy' though, nobody is going to respect a business leader's involvement in the civil/political sphere unless he's actually a respectable person.


One. Why do you ask?
Furthermore, why would the number of sexual partners I've had be a good or bad thing? I've met guys that have had a dozen sexual partners and girls that have had one. In fact, in general men have more sexual partners than women.

Well if this is true, someone is lying. strictly speaking (law of averages over a general population here), it's impossible for men to have more sexual partners on average than women, because in order for men to have a straight sexual encounter, a woman has to be involved, and since there are more men on the face of the earth, strictly speaking, if the number of unique sexual encounters is 1:1 (assuming one girl, one guy), women have to have had more sexual partners than men, since there are more men in our society than women.
I'm not sure if that came out clearly, but I can explain further if need be.

does anybody imagine athens is that guy at a party who is quiet at first, but then anytime anybody says ANYTHING he starts arguing with them since he has spent literally all his time reading mountains of information to support his predetermined viewpoints, and it's just f**king never ending until finally no one at the party is talking anymore because he can counter everything they say with a counterargument until eventually people forget what the original point was and/or are too tired to keep pointing out problems, and athens is sitting there like "I won the party"

Christ, I went out to a bar with someone JUST LIKE THAT the other night. It was f**king horrible. I eventually started talking louder and moving with some other people to another part of the room just to get away from it. Ugh.


Glad to see you don't have anything to back up your assertions. : )

Most social Libertarians won't 'admit' it because they approach Libertarianism from the social perspective, and they don't understand economics. I would argue it leads to the rise of natural elites, rather than 'plutocracy' though, nobody is going to respect a business leader's involvement in the civil/political sphere unless he's actually a respectable person.

>unless he's actually a respectable person
Or appears to be.

does anybody imagine athens is that guy at a party who is quiet at first, but then anytime anybody says ANYTHING he starts arguing with them since he has spent literally all his time reading mountains of information to support his predetermined viewpoints, and it's just f**king never ending until finally no one at the party is talking anymore because he can counter everything they say with a counterargument until eventually people forget what the original point was and/or are too tired to keep pointing out problems, and athens is sitting there like "I won the party"

>predetermined
Fun fact: I used to read (and agree) with Noam Chomsky.
So no, it's not confirmation bias.

WHY CAN WE NOT JUST UNDERSTAND AND RESPECT EACH SEX?
WHY CAN MEN AND WOMEN NOT F**KING GET ALONG?
WHY CAN MEN NOT UNDERSTAND WOMEN?
WHY CAN WOMEN NOT UNDERSTAND MEN?
WHY CAN NEITHER ATTRACT THE OTHER WITHOUT MANIPULATION AND BULLSH*T?
GODDAMNIT, WHY WHY WHY?
KSAJRLKSDJFKSDJFLKSDJFKSDJFKDSJF.

I'm sorry. I just read through the first sixty or so posts and it was the exact same bullsh*t over and over again.
Women: "BAWWW WHY CAN'T I GET A GUY WHO IS AN ALPHA IN FRONT OF HIS FRIENDS AND A TENDER LOVER/NICE GUY AROUND ME? MAYBE I SHOULD JUST ACT LIKE A WH**RE. MEN LIKE SEX, SO THAT SHOULD WORK. THEN I'LL HAVE MEN ALL OVER ME. BUT THEN MEN ARE SHALLOW BECAUSE THEY'RE ONLY ATTRACTED TO ME BECAUSE I WOULD BE PRETTY AND OFFERING SEX. BAWWW MEN ARE SHALLOW!"
Men: "BAWWW WOMEN ARE ALL BITCHES AND WH**RES. ALL THEY CARE ABOUT IS LOOKS AND THE MONEY IN YOUR WALLET. DICK SIZE IS IMPORTANT, TOO, BUT IT'S NOT LIKE THEY'LL BE ABLE TO FEEL EVEN A SEVENTY INCH DICK BECAUSE OF ALL THE NI**ER C**KS THEY'VE TAKEN UP THEIR GAPING VAGINAS. BAWWW, THEY DON'T WANT A NICE GUY LIKE ME, THEY JUST WANT DOUCHEBAG ALPHA MALES WHO ABUSE THEM AND TREAT THEM LIKE SH*T! IT MAYBE IF I ACT LIKE A GUIDO ALPHA MALE, BITCHES WILL BE ALL OVER MY DICK! BUT THEN WOMEN ARE SHALLOW BECAUSE THEY'RE ONLY ATTRACTED TO ME BECAUSE I'M A DICK TO THEM. BITCHES AND WH**RES! BAWWW."
It's the exact same thing. Every. F**king. Time.


>unless he's actually a respectable person
Or appears to be.

You can apply that logic to any political system ever.


You really think an average looking bachelor can just walk into a bar and say "Who wants to f**k me?" without:
a.) getting the sh*t kicked out of him
b.) girls calling the police saying theres a "creeper" here
c.) getting laughed at.
If you do, you really have no idea what the f**k you're talking about.

Everyone would be like "wtf?" if a woman did the same, and everyone would be yelling "f**king slut" at her, etc. I meant either gender of average attractiveness can easily get laid at a bar, not by waltzing in and saying "who wants to f**k" but by doing what people usually do to get laid. Dance, talk, ask if you wanna go back to the apartment.

Reminds me of my Hs years......Hit on the nerdy otaku girl..on v day, I gave her a big ass thing heart of chocolate and an anime mix cd....she took it and went on to date the jock
bitches and wh**res......


lol no, it's because women tend to take lower paying jobs (teachers, nurses) and men tend to take higher-paying jobs (doctors, lawyers). On top of that, if a woman has a child her ability to work is severely limited.

This is partially true, but it's also true that, for the same career, say (as an example) a CPA, the woman will almost invariably be paid less for the same position, because it's economically feasible; since women have a higher quit rate than men (mainly due to child rearing), employers don't want to invest as much in them, because this investment won't get as large a return if the woman gets pregnant and leaves the company to raise her child.
It's a classic case of how gender roles in society are translated into economic principles; morality is left out of the question, economically speaking; it's merely a matter of statistics and interpretation.

Reminds me of my Hs years......Hit on the nerdy otaku girl..on v day, I gave her a big ass thing heart of chocolate and an anime mix cd....she took it and went on to date the jock
bitches and wh**res......

>anime mix cd
>football players dating nerd girls and not just f**king them
>you said jock
>anime mix cd
>anime mix cd
>anime mix cd
>anime mix cd
>anime mix cd
ahahahahaha

Reminds me of my Hs years......Hit on the nerdy otaku girl..on v day, I gave her a big ass thing heart of chocolate and an anime mix cd....she took it and went on to date the jock
bitches and wh**res......

Quick question: Did you ever actually make you feelings known to her?
If not, you have no reason to complain, you little bitch.


Quick question: Did you ever actually make you feelings known to her?
If not, you have no reason to complain, you little bitch.

Giving her an anime mix cd and a big-ass thing of chocolate doesn't count as making his feelings known?

Look at these 'ronery girl' comics. Here's a good example.
Haven't you noticed in nearly all of these examples, the 'ronery girl' is infatuated with some pale, skinny 'nerd' - And then, mysteriously, some buxom, popular blonde comes along for whatever reason and starts hitting on the nerd, trying to steal him away from the nerd girl.
This doesn't make ANY f**king sense, yet it's the same premise all ronery girl comics are based on. Why would some cheerleader-like blonde suddenly start hitting on a pale skinny nerd?
The reality is of course, most females are being disingenuous - They weren't hitting on a nerd, they were hitting on some hipster/indief** 'hottie'. Because they're shallow.
Bitches and wh**res.

"Ronery girl" is indeed a oxymoron
While we are collectively raging in this thread, I would like to say that the "sexual liberation" of women in the 1960s and 1970s was bullsh*t. It had nothing to do with sexual equality, it just allowed sexual power to fall firmly into the hands of females and allows them to engage in hypergamy even more efficiently then before and without any of the consequences.

This is just patheticly derivative of all the male ronery comics, threads, copypasta etc on here that is at least a heartfelt expression of genuine pain and feeling. This is just some dumb wh**re playing at "me too", while fundamentally missing the point, and failing miserably at making it interesting or entertaining or thought-provoking anyway.
In any case, no of course this didn't happen. And if it did, it was only because she is record-breakingly ugly and probably smells. And why exactly is a night of meaningless sex with her somehow morally better than a night of meaningless sex with a hotter broad who doesn't look like the clingy, psycho type?



"Ronery girl" is indeed a oxymoron
While we are collectively raging in this thread, I would like to say that the "sexual liberation" of women in the 1960s and 1970s was bullsh*t. It had nothing to do with sexual equality, it just allowed sexual power to fall firmly into the hands of females and allows them to engage in hypergamy even more efficiently then before and without any of the consequences.

It's sad but I have to agree. Give sexual power to the women and you get what we experience since the 70ies: skyrocketing divorce rates, birth rates plummeting to a declining population, increased number of singles households and single parents. This is the program of a civilization that fades away.
The Muslims are smarter about this. From century-old experience they know that in order to keep their communities prospering they need to take away the power from one of the sexes. In 100 or 200 years they'll read about us in history books.


>is limitation on personal liberty
It's a limitation on political rights. Which aren't the same as private property rights.
I'd say the trade off is worth it. As Mill argued that only taxpayers should vote, because if non-taxpayers voted, they would tend vote for lavish government spending. Besides, democracy encourages short term exploitation by default as there is no 'owner' of the country's capital stock, just caretakers who exploit it for 4 or 8 years without regards for the future value.
Of course, there's the argument that a bigger electorate leads to a greater check and balance, that's nonsense, it just leads to a more stupid electorate, and certainly not less Government power.
The results are there for you to see with your own eyes. Tax rates under this system of universal compulsory democracy make the economic load endured by serfs seem modest. Government debt has risen to breathtaking levels. Gold has been replaced by Government manufactured paper currency with a continually diminishing value. Every detail of private life, property, trade and contract is regulated by ever higher mountains of paper law (legislation). In the name of social, public or national security our caretakers 'protect' us from global warming and cooling, the extinction of animals and plants, from husbands and wives, parents and employers, poverty, disease, disaster, ignorance, prejudice, racism, sexism, homophobia and countless other public enemies and dangers.

This comes about because the system isn't perfect, and it can be (somewhat) easily remedied. Term limits on elected officials would ensure that 'politician' can not be a career, and a standard moratorium on laws (ie. that they expire after a certain number of years) would cut down on the sheer amount of legislation that is passed once and never again reviewed. Other tweaks such as this could act as a balance against the short-sightedness inherent in a universal democracy without infringing on any liberties.

No comments:

Post a Comment