Feminist here ask me anything

Feminist here ask me anything.

How many licks does it take to cum to the center of a penis?

Are you an actual feminist who believes in what he/she says or are you just a HURF DURF IM GUNNA PISS OF THE NECKBEARS type of troll?

is it true you were born with breasts two sizes too small?

Are you the sort of feminist who believes women should have more rights than men or equal rights as men?
Are you the sort of feminist who thinks businesses shouldn't be allowed to take into account that they're legally mandated to grant women, and not men, maternity leave?

Feminism is a euphamism for attention wh**re

what's your take on the ultra hardcore feminists who hate men?

why wont you work like a man?
c**tnuggetchavunistpig

how does it feel to fight for something of lower value than man?

Are you a guy or a gal?
(Only ask because I'm a guy but would call myself a feminist.)

Iolno
IoI

Are you an actual feminist who believes in what he/she says or are you just a HURF DURF IM GUNNA PISS OF THE NECKBEARS type of troll?

A little bit of both. I do consider myself to be feminist IRL but I'll be damned if I don't enjoy pissing off neckbear(d)s.

is it true you were born with breasts two sizes too small?

Yea.

Are you the sort of feminist who believes women should have more rights than men or equal rights as men?
Are you the sort of feminist who thinks businesses shouldn't be allowed to take into account that they're legally mandated to grant women, and not men, maternity leave?

-Equal rights.
-I live in the US, where businesses aren't mandated to give women maternity leave at all. Not sure what you mean.

what's your take on the ultra hardcore feminists who hate men?

Most ultra hardcore feminists I know don't hate men at all. I know some non-feminists who hate men. Not much to say about them.

Are you a guy or a gal?
(Only ask because I'm a guy but would call myself a feminist.)

Female.

How does it feel to be a stupid, annoying c**t?

Rommel
great man or greatest man?

If I were to hit on you at the bar, how would I go about doing it to make you like completely wet

A little bit of both. I do consider myself to be feminist IRL but I'll be damned if I don't enjoy pissing off neckbear(d)s.

Yea.

-Equal rights.
-I live in the US, where businesses aren't mandated to give women maternity leave at all. Not sure what you mean.

>businesses aren't mandated to give women maternity leave
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MaternalLeaveAmerica.png
I assume you're aware there are other countries?
Anyway, I meant to say: If a business has a man and a women equally qualified in all regards, but is legally required to give the woman, and not the man, maternity leave, would you object to them picking the man?

If I were to hit on you at the bar, how would I go about doing it to make you like completely wet

Straightforward and sexual. My motto that all guys should follow is to have a cool personality and hot looks. Not desperate and ugly, whatever you do.

Question: How was your day, feminist?

WHO SAID YOU COULD LEAVE THE KITCHEN?

>businesses aren't mandated to give women maternity leave
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MaternalLeaveAmerica.png
I assume you're aware there are other countries?
Anyway, I meant to say: If a business has a man and a women equally qualified in all regards, but is legally required to give the woman, and not the man, maternity leave, would you object to them picking the man?

I am aware there are other countries, this issue is just simply a non-issue for me.
Personally, I would object to them refusing the male paternity leave in the first place, so its a bit of a loaded question. If any of those nations give parental leave only to women, I would question their motivations.

I am aware there are other countries, this issue is just simply a non-issue for me.
Personally, I would object to them refusing the male paternity leave in the first place, so its a bit of a loaded question. If any of those nations give parental leave only to women, I would question their motivations.

Women get babies inside of them. Men do not, you see. I don't know if anyone ever explained this to you.

Women get babies inside of them. Men do not, you see. I don't know if anyone ever explained this to you.

You don't really get maternity leave for just having a baby inside of you. You get it to take care of your newborn child. I would question the motivations of any nation who were to grant this to mothers but not to fathers.

Women get babies inside of them. Men do not, you see. I don't know if anyone ever explained this to you.

>takes two to tango
>can't take time off to take care of spawn after birth
>WHY WON'T MEN SPEND TIME WITH THEIR CHILDREN?
>rinse
>repeat

Question: How was your day, feminist?

Pretty good I'm eating some noodle soup.

how does it feel to fight for something of lower value than man?

I don't really "fight" because that would imply there is much resistance. All male supremacists do is bawwww really, and all I have to do for the "Focus on the Family" types is sit about and wait for them to die.
That being said reproductively speaking women are a bit more valuable than men. That doesn't mean they should have more rights of course.

Pretty good I'm eating some noodle soup.

I don't really "fight" because that would imply there is much resistance. All male supremacists do is bawwww really, and all I have to do for the "Focus on the Family" types is sit about and wait for them to die.
That being said reproductively speaking women are a bit more valuable than men. That doesn't mean they should have more rights of course.

Labor-wise, of course, they aren't.
Do you think women deserve equal pay for equal work despite the fact that they're far more likely to get pregnant and be unable to satisfactorily complete their job?

Do you think Lev Trotsky would have been a better leader than Stalin?
Were the roles inverted, do you think Trotsky would have had Stalin exiled, then murdered?

Labor-wise, of course, they aren't.
Do you think women deserve equal pay for equal work despite the fact that they're far more likely to get pregnant and be unable to satisfactorily complete their job?

Labor-wise of course they are. Having children is labor in and of itself, and yet women do it for free. Plus they do other work at less price, and they work harder while they are there.
"More likely" to get pregnant means jack sh*t. Either you complete the work or you don't. Men are a lot more likely to die than women. We could play this "more likely" game all night long.

Seriously.
I think i might just xx dis

So since this thread is apparently about children, what do you think about kids? Want some? Nice in theory? Miserable noisy little apes?

sage this sh*t
bzxlcox

So since this thread is apparently about children, what do you think about kids? Want some? Nice in theory? Miserable noisy little apes?

>Miserable noisy little apes
That about sums it up.
/thread

How does it make you feel knowing that the United States family court often awards custody of children to women by default following a divorce? Fair or unfair?

OMG PIG IN WELLIES

Labor-wise of course they are. Having children is labor in and of itself, and yet women do it for free. Plus they do other work at less price, and they work harder while they are there.
"More likely" to get pregnant means jack sh*t. Either you complete the work or you don't. Men are a lot more likely to die than women. We could play this "more likely" game all night long.

>implying women are as good for the 90% of jobs which are physical labor
What.
>men are more likely to die than women
What.
More likely to get pregnant is significant. If you discover that a potential employee has a 10% chance of committing suicide in the next three years, you don't want them as much. Even if they do as good of work while they're there. Because hiring new people is hard.
"Either they do the work or they don't" is a vastly oversimplified view of things.

So since this thread is apparently about children, what do you think about kids? Want some? Nice in theory? Miserable noisy little apes?

Don't want children I sort of hate them.

How does it make you feel knowing that the United States family court often awards custody of children to women by default following a divorce? Fair or unfair?

Is it by default, or is it just because women tend to be primary caretakers pre-divorce? As far as I can tell its the latter, every SAHD I've ever known had zero problem getting custody.

dserpderpity derpderp
>i think i made a good thread sh*ts so cash

ANSWER MY QUESTION, YOU WILD STRUMPET.

Do you think Lev Trotsky would have been a better leader than Stalin?
Were the roles inverted, do you think Trotsky would have had Stalin exiled, then murdered?

Don't want children I sort of hate them.

Is it by default, or is it just because women tend to be primary caretakers pre-divorce? As far as I can tell its the latter, every SAHD I've ever known had zero problem getting custody.

It's because women tend to be the primary caretakers that the court assumes, a priori, that they should get custody. Even without knowing if they were in this case.

Do you think that is is justified for a system to arrest a man without due process for domestic violence charges based on the accusation of a woman?

>implying women are as good for the 90% of jobs which are physical labor
What.
>men are more likely to die than women
What.
More likely to get pregnant is significant. If you discover that a potential employee has a 10% chance of committing suicide in the next three years, you don't want them as much. Even if they do as good of work while they're there. Because hiring new people is hard.
"Either they do the work or they don't" is a vastly oversimplified view of things.

Women are better for work. 90% of jobs have always involved some degree of physical labor, but in the end it's not the type of physical labor that is difficult for women.
Sure, hiring new people might be hard. But its impossible to predict who will still be around in 3 years and playing games with gender/age/race to try and guess is racist/sexist etc.
Men die more often than women do. Plain and simple. They are also lazier and demand higher salary.

I was a normal guy.
Never cheated on anyone,
Never made anyone feel bad.
I was never into the stereotype of what most feminists think of men.
And so I dated this feminist girl.... and she made my life impossible.
Seriously, she had so so so many issues with males that I had no f**king idea.
I mean, sure theres machismo in the world, but you dont have to take it on me... All feminist girls always try to find a guy that will treat them equally and be nice and all that, but thats not true.
What they want is to get somekind of revenge and if you are nice to a feminist woman, she will take all that hate and resentment and throw it all to you.
So, in my own personal experience:
"Feminism" and "equality rights" are in theory harmless struggles for justice in which I agree upon,
but 90% of women use it as a mascarade to stereotype and hate men even when they dont accept it or realize it themselves.
I honestly just wanted to prove a feminist girl that not all men where so sh*tty... and I ended up feeling like theres women who are so ressentful, they wont even live a plenty life neither trust anyone ever again and for that matter, im very glad I broke up with her.
so, in conclusion:
Do not date a feminist woman. They are just bitter and ugly inside.

F**k this thread. Seriously.
How many c**ks can you fit in your mouth at one time?

>implying women are as good for the 90% of jobs which are physical labor
What.
>men are more likely to die than women
What.
More likely to get pregnant is significant. If you discover that a potential employee has a 10% chance of committing suicide in the next three years, you don't want them as much. Even if they do as good of work while they're there. Because hiring new people is hard.
"Either they do the work or they don't" is a vastly oversimplified view of things.

I don't think any of this stuff is relevant, since OP specifically said that she would have a problem with employers not offering paternity leave. In which case, it doesn't matter whether you're hiring a man or a woman, they would be equally likely to take some leave when they have a child, so there's no comparison. Ideally, anyway, but I guess that's the point of feminism.

I'm a woman and modern feminism makes me want to punch myself in the crotch.
F**k off.

Women are better for work. 90% of jobs have always involved some degree of physical labor, but in the end it's not the type of physical labor that is difficult for women.
Sure, hiring new people might be hard. But its impossible to predict who will still be around in 3 years and playing games with gender/age/race to try and guess is racist/sexist etc.
Men die more often than women do. Plain and simple. They are also lazier and demand higher salary.

>Men die more often than women do.
>this is what feminists actually believe.jpg

Do you think that is is justified for a system to arrest a man without due process for domestic violence charges based on the accusation of a woman?

Obviously. Women shouldn't have to suffer abuse just because you need to fill your tiny penises up with blood, just so you can release semen.

I don't think any of this stuff is relevant, since OP specifically said that she would have a problem with employers not offering paternity leave. In which case, it doesn't matter whether you're hiring a man or a woman, they would be equally likely to take some leave when they have a child, so there's no comparison. Ideally, anyway, but I guess that's the point of feminism.

In almost all cases, women take leave while men continue working. Doesn't matter what you'd like to happen.

Obviously. Women shouldn't have to suffer abuse just because you need to fill your tiny penises up with blood, just so you can release semen.

My trolldar just beeped like crazy.

When will you be logging off?
God damn I'm clever. I love myself.

ANSWER MY QUESTION, YOU WILD STRUMPET.

Yes, and I have no idea. It is impossible to predict such an alternate history scenario. Anything can happen.

It's because women tend to be the primary caretakers that the court assumes, a priori, that they should get custody. Even without knowing if they were in this case.

Not in my experience at all. Like I said, every SAHD I've ever known has had zero problems to the point where I'm almost tempted to throw out stuff like this as urban legend.

Do you think that is is justified for a system to arrest a man without due process for domestic violence charges based on the accusation of a woman?

Pretty sure you can be arrested, but not convicted. The only requirement for arrest is a reasonable suspicion right?

When will you be logging off?
God damn I'm clever. I love myself.

Disregard this, I sucks c**ks.

Do you think that is is justified for a system to arrest a man without due process for domestic violence charges based on the accusation of a woman?

Arrest without due process? What? I don't think you know what due process is. The arrest is part of the due process.
You can be arrested because a single blind old lady points you out as a thief.
What's actually rageworthy is convictions based on the testimony of a single woman who by her own claims was extremely traumatized at the time. This is not what "reasonable doubt" means.

I was a normal guy.
Never cheated on anyone,
Never made anyone feel bad.
I was never into the stereotype of what most feminists think of men.
And so I dated this feminist girl.... and she made my life impossible.
Seriously, she had so so so many issues with males that I had no f**king idea.
I mean, sure theres machismo in the world, but you dont have to take it on me... All feminist girls always try to find a guy that will treat them equally and be nice and all that, but thats not true.
What they want is to get somekind of revenge and if you are nice to a feminist woman, she will take all that hate and resentment and throw it all to you.
So, in my own personal experience:
"Feminism" and "equality rights" are in theory harmless struggles for justice in which I agree upon,
but 90% of women use it as a mascarade to stereotype and hate men even when they dont accept it or realize it themselves.
I honestly just wanted to prove a feminist girl that not all men where so sh*tty... and I ended up feeling like theres women who are so ressentful, they wont even live a plenty life neither trust anyone ever again and for that matter, im very glad I broke up with her.
so, in conclusion:
Do not date a feminist woman. They are just bitter and ugly inside.

Whose stereotyping and taking out problems on other people now?

F**k this thread. Seriously.
How many c**ks can you fit in your mouth at one time?

How many anime figurines can you masturbate to at one time?

Do you think you'' ever get a decent guy, or have they all realized your a hypocritical bitch?

I'm a woman and modern feminism makes me want to punch myself in the crotch.
F**k off.

Thanks my lovely chubby weeaboo princess. I am sure all the dashing men of anonymous appreciate your warm gesture of solidarity.

Do you think you'' ever get a decent guy, or have they all realized your a hypocritical bitch?

I've gotten a few decent guys. I'm not remotely hypocritical I say what I believe and I believe what I say and every action I take is perfectly in harmony with my own beliefs. Not that such a thing matters when netting dick anyway.

I like how OP complains/attacks the people trolling this thread, you must be new here. Everyone in anonymous hates woman.

Women are better for work. 90% of jobs have always involved some degree of physical labor, but in the end it's not the type of physical labor that is difficult for women.
Sure, hiring new people might be hard. But its impossible to predict who will still be around in 3 years and playing games with gender/age/race to try and guess is racist/sexist etc.
Men die more often than women do. Plain and simple. They are also lazier and demand higher salary.

>its [sic] impossible to predict who will still be around in 3 years
Right. Which is why you make educated guesses with the best available data... which include gender trends.

In almost all cases, women take leave while men continue working. Doesn't matter what you'd like to happen.

There's no reason for men not to take leave when they have kids. There's no reason for men not to share equal responsibility and equal burden of having children to further their genetic legacy. Continuing to work is not sharing equal burden. "I'm the breadwinner, so I have equal share in responsibility". No. Women can have careers too, and there's no reason they should have to bear all of the damage to their careers just so you can have kids. If you want kids, you have to make a choice. This should apply to both genders. This is what feminism is about. Completely unnecessary double standards.

OP, if I put a top hat on my dick, would you think I had alot of money and therefore want to f**k me?

Yes, and I have no idea. It is impossible to predict such an alternate history scenario. Anything can happen.

Not in my experience at all. Like I said, every SAHD I've ever known has had zero problems to the point where I'm almost tempted to throw out stuff like this as urban legend.

Pretty sure you can be arrested, but not convicted. The only requirement for arrest is a reasonable suspicion right?

Oh, so you think Trotsky would be better but you can't tell what would happen.
Why do you assure this without knowing the answer? Are you not aware of the mechanisms of our language?
You have quite the incompetent mind. But i must say that i'm not surprised, you are a feminist, are you not?

There's no reason for men not to take leave when they have kids. There's no reason for men not to share equal responsibility and equal burden of having children to further their genetic legacy. Continuing to work is not sharing equal burden. "I'm the breadwinner, so I have equal share in responsibility". No. Women can have careers too, and there's no reason they should have to bear all of the damage to their careers just so you can have kids. If you want kids, you have to make a choice. This should apply to both genders. This is what feminism is about. Completely unnecessary double standards.

Yes, that's nice in theory. As a business in the real world, you care about what actually tends to happen, not what would be ideal. And in the real world, women take time off to raise children far more often than men.

>its [sic] impossible to predict who will still be around in 3 years
Right. Which is why you make educated guesses with the best available data... which include gender trends.

Yep, and men are more likely to die. Also more likely to steal from the company. And more likely to end up in prison.

I like how OP complains/attacks the people trolling this thread, you must be new here. Everyone in anonymous hates woman.

Show me a single person who I've attacked. Not once have I ever attacked a fellow anonymous-er.

Whose stereotyping and taking out problems on other people now?

How many anime figurines can you masturbate to at one time?

Lady, with all due respect, I am not trolling you neither I wan to fight with you, but let me tell you this.
My feminist ex had a lot of friends and she would to go this feminist reunions in which I gladly went to support their cause.
I understand the troubles and struggles of women rights across the history and I support their fight.
But I certainly got another view out of all of this.
Like I said before, 90% of feminists just have issues with men in general and they just want some kind of revenge.
They have some kind of personal vendetta against testosterone.
This is not generalizing.
Ive seen it. I know it.
You are talking to an ex male feminist.
The fact you are coming here to fight with a bunch of known misogynists like web is prove enough that you just like to make men feel bad for being men and that includes you in my little list of resentful women who will never live a plenty life because of their sh*tty hate for men.

Your ignorant.
Nugh' said., you want all these great things to happen for woman. You say all you want is equality, when in reality you want power over men.
"Pic related, its a male." Like seriously are you 10? Grow the f**k up. Your extremely immature, and your one of those fa**ots who pushes their ideas onto other people.
Your just plain sad.

OP, if I put a top hat on my dick, would you think I had alot of money and therefore want to f**k me?

How big is your dick?

Oh, so you think Trotsky would be better but you can't tell what would happen.
Why do you assure this without knowing the answer? Are you not aware of the mechanisms of our language?
You have quite the incompetent mind. But i must say that i'm not surprised, you are a feminist, are you not?

Assure what? I just prefer Trotsky, how would I know what would happen to Lenin? Far too hypothetical for someone with a surface knowledge such as myself.

Yes, that's nice in theory. As a business in the real world, you care about what actually tends to happen, not what would be ideal. And in the real world, women take time off to raise children far more often than men.

Feminism is about working toward ideals, aka an egalitarian and just society. Hope this helps.

Yep, and men are more likely to die. Also more likely to steal from the company. And more likely to end up in prison.

Show me a single person who I've attacked. Not once have I ever attacked a fellow anonymous-er.

>men are more likely to die
You keep saying this. Everybody dies, sweetheart.
>men are more likely to steal from the company and go to prison
Not substantially.

Lady, with all due respect, I am not trolling you neither I wan to fight with you, but let me tell you this.
My feminist ex had a lot of friends and she would to go this feminist reunions in which I gladly went to support their cause.
I understand the troubles and struggles of women rights across the history and I support their fight.
But I certainly got another view out of all of this.
Like I said before, 90% of feminists just have issues with men in general and they just want some kind of revenge.
They have some kind of personal vendetta against testosterone.
This is not generalizing.
Ive seen it. I know it.
You are talking to an ex male feminist.
The fact you are coming here to fight with a bunch of known misogynists like web is prove enough that you just like to make men feel bad for being men and that includes you in my little list of resentful women who will never live a plenty life because of their sh*tty hate for men.

Name once I've ever made a man feel bad for being a man. I'm not even sure how to do this. You are obviously a bit paranoid. (No offense). And you write too much.

Your ignorant.
Nugh' said., you want all these great things to happen for woman. You say all you want is equality, when in reality you want power over men.
"Pic related, its a male." Like seriously are you 10? Grow the f**k up. Your extremely immature, and your one of those fa**ots who pushes their ideas onto other people.
Your just plain sad.

Not once did I ever say "pic related its a male". Its a cute pig wearing cute boots. Some other guy said it was a male. (Technically he is correct the pig is a male pig). You are just butthurt in general.

Hey, OP. Get to the kitchen and me me a samwich, while your in there grab me a beer. Then when you come back, I'll abuse you, rape you, then you'll have a baby which you will have to care for. When you get all butthurt that you realize "oh sh*t im retarded and i cant work for sh*t" you'll turn to prostitution.

>men are more likely to die
You keep saying this. Everybody dies, sweetheart.
>men are more likely to steal from the company and go to prison
Not substantially.

More likely to die tomorrow, how about that? At any given age, a greater % of men die than women. Plain and simple. And men go to prison in droves. Gender trends cut both ways. Honestly the whole "theres a slight chance she might get pregnant and take time off!!!!" is a blatant excuse. It doesn't fool a single woman. We just don't complain because companies which make that type of argument tend to be shady to begin with.

HOW DOES IT FEEL TO KNOW THAT NOONE WILL SPEND THE TIME TO UNDERSTAND THE HISTORY AND DISCOURSE BEHIND "FEMINISM?" YET THEY WILL ALL JUMP TO RIDICULE YOU WHILE BLISSFULLY UNAWARE AND UNCONCERNED WITH THEIR OWN IGNORANCE?

I am this same anon

Lady, with all due respect, I am not trolling you neither I wan to fight with you, but let me tell you this.
My feminist ex had a lot of friends and she would to go this feminist reunions in which I gladly went to support their cause.
I understand the troubles and struggles of women rights across the history and I support their fight.
But I certainly got another view out of all of this.
Like I said before, 90% of feminists just have issues with men in general and they just want some kind of revenge.
They have some kind of personal vendetta against testosterone.
This is not generalizing.
Ive seen it. I know it.
You are talking to an ex male feminist.
The fact you are coming here to fight with a bunch of known misogynists like web is prove enough that you just like to make men feel bad for being men and that includes you in my little list of resentful women who will never live a plenty life because of their sh*tty hate for men.

Your ignorant.
Nugh' said., you want all these great things to happen for woman. You say all you want is equality, when in reality you want power over men.
"Pic related, its a male." Like seriously are you 10? Grow the f**k up. Your extremely immature, and your one of those fa**ots who pushes their ideas onto other people.
Your just plain sad.

I think this guy is right. Most feminists claim for equality rights when they just really want to be able to somehow have a fascist dictatorship over men so they can get revenge for all the pains women have passed through.
Feminists tend to forget or just ignore world history and see that not only them have suffered.
They like to split things in the half and pretend nothing happened outside their gender equality.
Ive find out that 90% of all feminist women out there are certainly mostly ignorant of today and past politics, history and society.
So, basically, a feminist is the equivalent of a fanatic christian of jesuscamp

More likely to die tomorrow, how about that? At any given age, a greater % of men die than women. Plain and simple. And men go to prison in droves. Gender trends cut both ways. Honestly the whole "theres a slight chance she might get pregnant and take time off!!!!" is a blatant excuse. It doesn't fool a single woman. We just don't complain because companies which make that type of argument tend to be shady to begin with.

How does it feel knowing you came to the palace of woman haters to preech your bullsh*t?
F**k you wh**re. Go suck a dick.

Why has feminism unleashed a pollution on the world of women who just don't get it?

Why won't you shut the f**k up and spread your legs for me, c**t?

Arrest without due process? What? I don't think you know what due process is. The arrest is part of the due process.
You can be arrested because a single blind old lady points you out as a thief.
What's actually rageworthy is convictions based on the testimony of a single woman who by her own claims was extremely traumatized at the time. This is not what "reasonable doubt" means.

No, I think that you don't know what due process is. A lawful arrest involves probable cause. An old lady accusing someone of being a thief would likely be laughed at by police, just like a man claiming to be in an abusive relationship despite showing signs of physical harm.

Name once I've ever made a man feel bad for being a man. I'm not even sure how to do this. You are obviously a bit paranoid. (No offense). And you write too much.

Not once did I ever say "pic related its a male". Its a cute pig wearing cute boots. Some other guy said it was a male. (Technically he is correct the pig is a male pig). You are just butthurt in general.

I write too much? HA it seems like you just dont want to debate anything then.
And this whole thread is prove enough of you being an a**hole.
You didnt come here to show your support or understanding of the feminist movement, you came here to insult, retaliate and just plain argue with men you already know are macho macho.
Is like going to hitler to talk about judaism.
like going to the pope to talk about sex
to go to the white house and talk about the 9/11 movement
thats what you are doing, you are trolling.
Accept the fact that you dont feel yourself a feminist unless you are making a man feel bad.

I am this same anon


I think this guy is right. Most feminists claim for equality rights when they just really want to be able to somehow have a fascist dictatorship over men so they can get revenge for all the pains women have passed through.
Feminists tend to forget or just ignore world history and see that not only them have suffered.
They like to split things in the half and pretend nothing happened outside their gender equality.
Ive find out that 90% of all feminist women out there are certainly mostly ignorant of today and past politics, history and society.
So, basically, a feminist is the equivalent of a fanatic christian of jesuscamp

lol @ "fascist". Who has no understanding of history? It is you who are paranoid, stereotyping and ignorant. No offense.

HOW DOES IT FEEL TO KNOW THAT NOONE WILL SPEND THE TIME TO UNDERSTAND THE HISTORY AND DISCOURSE BEHIND "FEMINISM?" YET THEY WILL ALL JUMP TO RIDICULE YOU WHILE BLISSFULLY UNAWARE AND UNCONCERNED WITH THEIR OWN IGNORANCE?

DONT KNOW WHAT YOU MEAN FEMINISM HAS BEEN A PRETTY SUCCESSFUL MOVEMENT AND IF IT WERE TRUE THAT NO ONE WOULD LISTEN THEN I WOULD NOT BE HERE RIGHT NOW POSTING IN THIS INFORMATIVE THREAD.

How big is your dick?

Assure what? I just prefer Trotsky, how would I know what would happen to Lenin? Far too hypothetical for someone with a surface knowledge such as myself.

Feminism is about working toward ideals, aka an egalitarian and just society. Hope this helps.

Yes, well, shamefully ignorant is another way to put it.
But i'll let it slide.
What i won't let slide is the fact that you mixed Stalin with Lenin.
Your stupidity is an insult to natural selection, your genealogical history must be both a miracle and a mystery.
For that, you have proven yourself amusing, so i forgive you.

misogynists = feminists (bitter)

Pig in boots pretty much sums it all up.

More likely to die tomorrow, how about that? At any given age, a greater % of men die than women. Plain and simple. And men go to prison in droves. Gender trends cut both ways. Honestly the whole "theres a slight chance she might get pregnant and take time off!!!!" is a blatant excuse. It doesn't fool a single woman. We just don't complain because companies which make that type of argument tend to be shady to begin with.

>At any given age, a greater % of men die than women.
Yeah, about 10%. It's certainly something businesses take into account... but it doesn't outweigh the far greater chance of a woman of working age getting pregnant in a given year.

How does it feel knowing you came to the palace of woman haters to preech your bullsh*t?
F**k you wh**re. Go suck a dick.

I don't think for a second anonymous hates women. They just troll women in the hopes of getting the attention that their mothers never bothered giving them (they also can't get female attention IRL for obvious reasons). (They are ugly nerds).
I give them this attention, and in return I get pseudo-dirty talk. Win-win, IMHO.

I don't think for a second anonymous hates women. They just troll women in the hopes of getting the attention that their mothers never bothered giving them (they also can't get female attention IRL for obvious reasons). (They are ugly nerds).
I give them this attention, and in return I get pseudo-dirty talk. Win-win, IMHO.

Entertainingly, about 30% of anonymous is female. Including many of the misogynist posts.

I write too much? HA it seems like you just dont want to debate anything then.
And this whole thread is prove enough of you being an a**hole.
You didnt come here to show your support or understanding of the feminist movement, you came here to insult, retaliate and just plain argue with men you already know are macho macho.
Is like going to hitler to talk about judaism.
like going to the pope to talk about sex
to go to the white house and talk about the 9/11 movement
thats what you are doing, you are trolling.
Accept the fact that you dont feel yourself a feminist unless you are making a man feel bad.

How am I making a man feel bad just by posting this thread? The men on anonymous are past the ability to feel pain. Their lives are already such wrecks this thread means nothing to them. Hope this helps.

Can we talk about *actual* feminism, instead of misandry in disguise?

Bravissima, OP. I wish that your words could get through to this crowd.

Entertainingly, about 30% of anonymous is female. Including many of the misogynist posts.

Oh absolutely. No one likes dirty talk the same way women like dirty talk. Notice how my post is non-gender specific. I think 30% is a bit high though for anonymous.

Can we talk about *actual* feminism, instead of misandry in disguise?

Uh, when have I shown any sign of misandry. If anything there has been far more misogyny in disguise though you won't see me bawwing about it.

lol @ "fascist". Who has no understanding of history? It is you who are paranoid, stereotyping and ignorant. No offense.

DONT KNOW WHAT YOU MEAN FEMINISM HAS BEEN A PRETTY SUCCESSFUL MOVEMENT AND IF IT WERE TRUE THAT NO ONE WOULD LISTEN THEN I WOULD NOT BE HERE RIGHT NOW POSTING IN THIS INFORMATIVE THREAD.

Oh tell me im lying,
If, by for some reason, all men in the world stepped down and gave all the power of the world to feminist women....
what do you think it would happen?
I could even say Fascism is too little of a word for what they would truly do.

How am I making a man feel bad just by posting this thread? The men on anonymous are past the ability to feel pain. Their lives are already such wrecks this thread means nothing to them. Hope this helps.

Thanks for coming OP, but its about time you GTFO.
This thread is just people stating their opinions and you bashing them to make yourself look right.
And lol at you talking about a pathetic life when you are also browsing web.
You must be a miserable person.

Me: female here.
Misogynist troll: You SLUT I bet you suck a thousand c**ks a night and you like it!!!
Me: Oh no anything but sexy talk anymore of this and I might end up having to masturbate.

How am I making a man feel bad just by posting this thread? The men on anonymous are past the ability to feel pain. Their lives are already such wrecks this thread means nothing to them. Hope this helps.

You are generalizing.
There are women in anonymous,
and you know pretty well web in itself its filled with misogynist men.

Oh tell me im lying,
If, by for some reason, all men in the world stepped down and gave all the power of the world to feminist women....
what do you think it would happen?
I could even say Fascism is too little of a word for what they would truly do.

Then I think you are a bit paranoid. The most feminist-influenced nations are also the most free nations in terms of personal liberty. Its the patriarchal nations like Saudi Arabia which tend to be pretty bad. I don't think for a second you actually hung out with any feminists if you claim such a thing.

Uh, when have I shown any sign of misandry. If anything there has been far more misogyny in disguise though you won't see me bawwing about it.

What I meant is that everyone in this thread seems to be bawwing about "feminists" who just hate men and want special rights, etc etc. I certainly didn't mean to imply that you were one of those women, you haven't said anything like that. I'm annoyed at how many people just assumed you were regardless and just started complaining about it.

Me: female here.
Misogynist troll: You SLUT I bet you suck a thousand c**ks a night and you like it!!!
Me: Oh no anything but sexy talk anymore of this and I might end up having to masturbate.

Misogynist troll: I bet you'd like to get raped by 5 guys every single night you wh**re.
Me: Hnnnnnnngggggh.
Either they are doing it on purpose or they have no idea how to actually insult women because they are all virgins with 2.5" dicks.

What I meant is that everyone in this thread seems to be bawwing about "feminists" who just hate men and want special rights, etc etc. I certainly didn't mean to imply that you were one of those women, you haven't said anything like that. I'm annoyed at how many people just assumed you were regardless and just started complaining about it.

I predicted their reaction and that is exactly why I set this thread up.

Then I think you are a bit paranoid. The most feminist-influenced nations are also the most free nations in terms of personal liberty. Its the patriarchal nations like Saudi Arabia which tend to be pretty bad. I don't think for a second you actually hung out with any feminists if you claim such a thing.

Rulerrrrrrrrrrrr is paranoid as hell. Its his gimmick.

You are generalizing.
There are women in anonymous,
and you know pretty well web in itself its filled with misogynist men.

You mean beta males

Misogynist troll: I bet you'd like to get raped by 5 guys every single night you wh**re.
Me: Hnnnnnnngggggh.
Either they are doing it on purpose or they have no idea how to actually insult women because they are all virgins with 2.5" dicks.

I will have to make a thread like that one night.
"Why do men use dirty talk in lieu of actual insults?"
I can always tell when I am talking to a female because females know how to make it sting. Dirty talk just makes you horny. Or is that the point?

I predicted their reaction and that is exactly why I set this thread up.

Rulerrrrrrrrrrrr is paranoid as hell. Its his gimmick.

You know im a gentleman, so ill give you the point that I might be a little paranoid.
It still doenst change my views of what feminist women truly want: Revenge.
The feminist movement is great, while there isnt any women trying to get their anger out by burning their bras

You know im a gentleman, so ill give you the point that I might be a little paranoid.
It still doenst change my views of what feminist women truly want: Revenge.
The feminist movement is great, while there isnt any women trying to get their anger out by burning their bras

Revenge for what? You make no sense. Furthermore, burning a bra hurts, at worst, the environment. Not men.

Revenge for what? You make no sense. Furthermore, burning a bra hurts, at worst, the environment. Not men.

Burning bra thing probably isn't even true there is no evidence it ever happened.
Its a strawman made to make feminists look more extreme and scary.
Pretty telling when the worst possible strawman for feminists is BURNING a BRA. Oh no anything but that.

Dear Feminist,
What is a good recipe for sauce in chicken cacciatore?
How does one stop procrastinating?
Why does everybody nowadays have holes in their jeans? I mean, seriously.
How do you sew a patch onto the inside of a jean leg, around the upper thigh area?
Anxiously awaiting your answers.

Dear Feminist,
What is a good recipe for sauce in chicken cacciatore?
How does one stop procrastinating?
Why does everybody nowadays have holes in their jeans? I mean, seriously.
How do you sew a patch onto the inside of a jean leg, around the upper thigh area?
Anxiously awaiting your answers.

-I don't know what that is but for sauce on my chicken I always mix hot sauce, butter and vinegar for an extra spicy treat.
-Just start moving. No key or trick its 100% willpower that separates the weak from the strong.
-Its because people dont got enough f**king $$$ and jeans cost a lot of it. I have like 4 pairs and they are all falling apart but whatever.
-Same way you sew a patch anywhere else, its not like the upper thigh area is particularly difficult to patch. Use a softer patch than what the jean is made out of.

-I don't know what that is but for sauce on my chicken I always mix hot sauce, butter and vinegar for an extra spicy treat.
-Just start moving. No key or trick its 100% willpower that separates the weak from the strong.
-Its because people dont got enough f**king $$$ and jeans cost a lot of it. I have like 4 pairs and they are all falling apart but whatever.
-Same way you sew a patch anywhere else, its not like the upper thigh area is particularly difficult to patch. Use a softer patch than what the jean is made out of.

Yeah, but they sell jeans with holes already in them. And at full price anyway.
I have a pair of the most comfortable jeans, but it's all ripped away on the inner thigh. I patch only stays so long before it gets rubbed off too. I'm too self-conscious to go out in jeans that people can see my groin muscles in.

I'm a man, and I'm superior to you in every way.
How does that make you feel?

Kay.
I've always felt that these particular ideologies that focus on upholding the integrity of one group or idea are...damaging, as a whole, to the advancement of society. I mean, I know it seems like it's all just damage being undone, but when you look at feminists, racial-pride rallies, environmentalists, ect...anything that caters to a specific message rather than reacting to current situations and circumstances, well, it seems rather divisive. Yeah, there are some people who are a**holes, but they fall all over the demograpic. Why target men? Just curious is all. It actually makes me a little sad to think that people devote their time to this stuff. Perhaps that's a little closed minded of me, but I honestly don't get it. So...what's the appeal? Why are you a feminist? And if it's not a question that can be answered by nature, then please explain the name. Why the need for a label at all?

I'm a man, and I'm superior to you in every way.
How does that make you feel?

If you are superior in every way, what is YOUR recipe for chicken cacciatore? How much tomato paste do you use? Do you use fancy spices?

Kay.
I've always felt that these particular ideologies that focus on upholding the integrity of one group or idea are...damaging, as a whole, to the advancement of society. I mean, I know it seems like it's all just damage being undone, but when you look at feminists, racial-pride rallies, environmentalists, ect...anything that caters to a specific message rather than reacting to current situations and circumstances, well, it seems rather divisive. Yeah, there are some people who are a**holes, but they fall all over the demograpic. Why target men? Just curious is all. It actually makes me a little sad to think that people devote their time to this stuff. Perhaps that's a little closed minded of me, but I honestly don't get it. So...what's the appeal? Why are you a feminist? And if it's not a question that can be answered by nature, then please explain the name. Why the need for a label at all?

The appeal is increasing equality between the sexes and being able to discuss the issues which effect me and other people who are effected by gender roles. Plain and simple. I don't think we are targeting men per se, some of the hardest traditionalists are women. There you have it.

I'm a man, and I'm superior to you in every way.
How does that make you feel?

Give me 5 ways in which you are superior to me. You have no idea who I am. HTH.

The appeal is increasing equality between the sexes and being able to discuss the issues which effect me and other people who are effected by gender roles. Plain and simple. I don't think we are targeting men per se, some of the hardest traditionalists are women. There you have it.

you mean 'affect' and 'affected'

you mean 'affect' and 'affected'

No actually I mean broccoli, derp. Are you retarded or something?

Feminist here ask me anything.

I have a question, OP. How do you feel about engagement rings? Do you want one eventually? If so, how do you reconcile that with being a feminist?
Further to that, will you change your name to your husband's when/if you marry?

Me: Today I came home and ate a peanut butter and jelly sandwhich.
GENIUS anonymouser: HMMMMMMMMM damn what could this post mean??!?!?!?! I dont get it???? *Thinks about it, stays up all night tossing and turning and sh*t*
Genius anonymouser: Oh you mean "sandwich".
*Walks away cape fluttering in the breeze. A true hero*

Do you think that is is justified for a system to arrest a man without due process for domestic violence charges based on the accusation of a woman?

>arrest
>due process
I don't think you know how the American legal system works. People are arrested on the basis of accusations pretty much all the time.
Due process pertains to determining guilt and then punishment.

I have a question, OP. How do you feel about engagement rings? Do you want one eventually? If so, how do you reconcile that with being a feminist?
Further to that, will you change your name to your husband's when/if you marry?

No and no. I can't imagine getting married. I see no real benefit to it, especially all the cutsie vaguely insulting sh*t that goes along with it. I don't think that women who jump through the little hoops are necessarily unfeminist, they have a lot more courage than I do, but I know too many miserable married women to consider such a thing for myself. Cohabitation suits my lifestyle better.

No and no. I can't imagine getting married. I see no real benefit to it, especially all the cutsie vaguely insulting sh*t that goes along with it. I don't think that women who jump through the little hoops are necessarily unfeminist, they have a lot more courage than I do, but I know too many miserable married women to consider such a thing for myself. Cohabitation suits my lifestyle better.

I wouldn't describe expecting an engagement ring as a "little hoop". Are you talking about the name change business? How is that not un-feminist?

I wouldn't describe expecting an engagement ring as a "little hoop". Are you talking about the name change business? How is that not un-feminist?

Engagement rings, white dresses to show what a virgin you are, paying for a big party, name change, asking for your fathers hand, etc.
There is nothing objectively unfeminist about someone changing there name. Its unfeminist that it comes from the idea that women now belong to the husband in question though. But its not my business and I have no intention of ever marrying.

Feminist here ask me anything.

Who has a stronger muscular structure on average, men or women? Who has larger brain size on average, men or women?

You know im a gentleman, so ill give you the point that I might be a little paranoid.
It still doenst change my views of what feminist women truly want: Revenge.
The feminist movement is great, while there isnt any women trying to get their anger out by burning their bras

Not OP here. Need to make that clear.
A.) You're playing mindreader and making assumptions about a pretty diverse ideological trend based on one mentally ill individual and her likely similar friends. This is impoverished thinking.
B). The oppressed are entitled to revenge. I'm all for the small minority of feminists who realize that and don't back down form it.

Who has a stronger muscular structure on average, men or women? Who has larger brain size on average, men or women?

The guy asking the question here.
The correct answer for both questions was...
DING DING DING
Men

Engagement rings, white dresses to show what a virgin you are, paying for a big party, name change, asking for your fathers hand, etc.
There is nothing objectively unfeminist about someone changing there name. Its unfeminist that it comes from the idea that women now belong to the husband in question though. But its not my business and I have no intention of ever marrying.

>someone changing there name
I think I see a trend here...

Do you like to be spanked?

Do you like to be spanked?

Yes. I also have a piss fetish.

The guy asking the question here.
The correct answer for both questions was...
DING DING DING
Men

Men's brains tend to be larger by volume. Women's brains tend to be "folded" more tightly, thus fitting the same number of (or more) neurons in a smaller space.
Also, the areas in the brain associated with language acquisition are larger in women and the neuropil of the female brain is more developed.
Typical biological determinist. HURR DURR. BIGGER BETTER.
Not OP.

Do you feel that feminist views closely mirror Marxist views? I only ever hear them mentioned in the same breath in political science circles, and I honestly can't think of a single difference between their takes on history aside from occassionally replacing "proletariat" with "wome.n"

Men's brains tend to be larger by volume. Women's brains tend to be "folded" more tightly, thus fitting the same number of (or more) neurons in a smaller space.
Also, the areas in the brain associated with language acquisition are larger in women and the neuropil of the female brain is more developed.
Typical biological determinist. HURR DURR. BIGGER BETTER.
Not OP.

Pitiful little ants use the same excuse

Do you feel that feminist views closely mirror Marxist views? I only ever hear them mentioned in the same breath in political science circles, and I honestly can't think of a single difference between their takes on history aside from occassionally replacing "proletariat" with "wome.n"

Uh yes the relationship between socialism and egalitarianism in general is pretty good.
There are capitalist feminists though they tend to be naive.

Men's brains tend to be larger by volume. Women's brains tend to be "folded" more tightly, thus fitting the same number of (or more) neurons in a smaller space.
Also, the areas in the brain associated with language acquisition are larger in women and the neuropil of the female brain is more developed.
Typical biological determinist. HURR DURR. BIGGER BETTER.
Not OP.

[citation needed]
xxxxerz

What do you think of the fact that women's IQ's are on average like 2 points lower than mens?
Also, what about psychological differences which lead men to genuinely become interested in issues/so forth whereas women are more or less pre-disposed to be interested in mostly relationship things? I mean, there's no way you can do a scientific analysis of that but from all the girls I knew from highschool by far and large the interesting people were all male and could talk about any sorts of subjects logically and rationally and while the smart girls weren't dumb and worthy of my contempt, they never got to that same level of critical logical thinking or read about history and so forth.

Do you feel that feminist views closely mirror Marxist views? I only ever hear them mentioned in the same breath in political science circles, and I honestly can't think of a single difference between their takes on history aside from occassionally replacing "proletariat" with "wome.n"

Contemporary feminism tends to be influenced by Marxism. This makes sense, however, as Marxist historical materialism was the first rigorous historical theory to analyze history from below.
Feminist cultural criticism is especially indebted to Western Marxism.

What do you think of the fact that women's IQ's are on average like 2 points lower than mens?
Also, what about psychological differences which lead men to genuinely become interested in issues/so forth whereas women are more or less pre-disposed to be interested in mostly relationship things? I mean, there's no way you can do a scientific analysis of that but from all the girls I knew from highschool by far and large the interesting people were all male and could talk about any sorts of subjects logically and rationally and while the smart girls weren't dumb and worthy of my contempt, they never got to that same level of critical logical thinking or read about history and so forth.

lol, anecdotal evidence that assumes something very easily socially determined must be natural.

lol, anecdotal evidence that assumes something very easily socially determined must be natural.

2 IQ points lower is not anecdotal evidence.... Unless that's just some phrase you heard and don't actually know what anecdotal means.

My girlfriend is completely subservient to me. She thinks feminism is a disease and that female submission is fully natural and healthy. When we get married, she wants to be a housewife.
How does that make you feel?

lol, anecdotal evidence that assumes something very easily socially determined must be natural.

I don't think that society is much of a factor in what we're talking about at all. Nerdy girls who have been secluded all their lives, brainwashed hardcore christians that I know and every type of girl from every upbringing, even "alternative" girls who don't try to be feiminine at all still end up far more interested in relationships, looks, and pleasing their parents/teachers far more than guys.

What do you think of the fact that women's IQ's are on average like 2 points lower than mens?
Also, what about psychological differences which lead men to genuinely become interested in issues/so forth whereas women are more or less pre-disposed to be interested in mostly relationship things? I mean, there's no way you can do a scientific analysis of that but from all the girls I knew from highschool by far and large the interesting people were all male and could talk about any sorts of subjects logically and rationally and while the smart girls weren't dumb and worthy of my contempt, they never got to that same level of critical logical thinking or read about history and so forth.

I'm skeptical of that particular study and its been contradicted by many others.
Women are genuinely interested in issues, and relationship things are "issues" in any case. Your experience greatly contradicts mine especially with respect to history.

My girlfriend is completely subservient to me. She thinks feminism is a disease and that female submission is fully natural and healthy. When we get married, she wants to be a housewife.
How does that make you feel?

It doesn't make me feel anything. I don't even know you or her and its not like phyllis schlafly types are uncommon.

I'm skeptical of that particular study and its been contradicted by many others.
Women are genuinely interested in issues, and relationship things are "issues" in any case. Your experience greatly contradicts mine especially with respect to history.

Why is the engineering field, arguably one of the fields that requires the highest degree of intelligence to pursue, dominated by men.

Where can I find a sexy feminist to domme me?

2 IQ points lower is not anecdotal evidence.... Unless that's just some phrase you heard and don't actually know what anecdotal means.

The bulk of your post was about people you knew in high school and their interests tended to shake out. That is not only the definition of anecdotal, it is stupid. The mere suggestion that you could extrapolate something about the natural tendencies of the sexes based on a sample that small with so many uncontrolled variables at work borders on offensive in its complete lack of scientific value.
As for the two points, that means very little given the fact that an individual's IQ will vary about that much or a little more from test session to test session and that the SD for most IQ tests is 15 points.
A more interesting question about sex and IQ is why women tend toward the mean, while men are overrepresented at both extremes of the scale.

Why is the engineering field, arguably one of the fields that requires the highest degree of intelligence to pursue, dominated by men.

Uh engineering doesn't require that much intelligence. Its dominated by men due to lack of female applicants and general female prejudice toward the type of men who inhabit engineering programs.

doing a project on feminism for humanities, any books you read on feminism you would consider reccomending?

Uh engineering doesn't require that much intelligence. Its dominated by men due to lack of female applicants and general female prejudice toward the type of men who inhabit engineering programs.

>Uh engineering doesn't require that much intelligence
Anybody who says this has no idea what they are talking about.

doing a project on feminism for humanities, any books you read on feminism you would consider reccomending?

Bitch or Colonize This or something classic like Backlash.

What do you think of the fact that women's IQ's are on average like 2 points lower than mens?
Also, what about psychological differences which lead men to genuinely become interested in issues/so forth whereas women are more or less pre-disposed to be interested in mostly relationship things? I mean, there's no way you can do a scientific analysis of that but from all the girls I knew from highschool by far and large the interesting people were all male and could talk about any sorts of subjects logically and rationally and while the smart girls weren't dumb and worthy of my contempt, they never got to that same level of critical logical thinking or read about history and so forth.

I don't think that's true.
I seem to remember reading somewhere that the average intelligence is the same for men and women (actually, it might be higher for women, but I can't remember for sure and I don't remember where I saw this), but the standard deviations are different. There are a lot more women whose intelligence is close to the average. Whereas men are more spread out: there are more geniuses, but also more idiots.
Not that any of this matters. You can't just take a statistic like that and apply it to random people you meet on the street. "Oh hai, I'm a guy, so I'm smarter than you!" Yeah... no.

I'm skeptical of that particular study and its been contradicted by many others.
Women are genuinely interested in issues, and relationship things are "issues" in any case. Your experience greatly contradicts mine especially with respect to history.

In my grade at school we had 4 extremist personalities amongst the guys(and maybe 3/4 others who weren't as extremist but still interesting and opinionated) 1 was a metalhead to the extreme who would constantly rag out pop culture and worked out to a point where he became ridiculously buff and thought about alot of other things critically, another was a hardcore communist who could recite like paragraphs upon paragraphs of the communist manifesto, and then turned into a massive existentialist hippie, and another guy who was all into politics and public opinions on things, and myself who is pretty much into everything but my main issue in highschool was how extremely religious I was and how I changed to be extremely agnostic. There were no girls, smart or stupid, that were genuinely interested in such a broad range of things, with the ability to think logically about them all. None of them ever changed their opinions following a debate (in fact i don't think any of them ever even debated anything) and to me that's proof of women being interested in simpler things

>Uh engineering doesn't require that much intelligence
Anybody who says this has no idea what they are talking about.

>Anybody who says this has no idea what they are talking about.
Uh yes I do. I was raised by two engineers know a lot of engineers they might have to study more but in general they are painfully average.

The bulk of your post was about people you knew in high school and their interests tended to shake out. That is not only the definition of anecdotal, it is stupid. The mere suggestion that you could extrapolate something about the natural tendencies of the sexes based on a sample that small with so many uncontrolled variables at work borders on offensive in its complete lack of scientific value.
As for the two points, that means very little given the fact that an individual's IQ will vary about that much or a little more from test session to test session and that the SD for most IQ tests is 15 points.
A more interesting question about sex and IQ is why women tend toward the mean, while men are overrepresented at both extremes of the scale.

That doesn't seem like a terribly difficult question to me. Our society is still obsessed with the idea of the man choosing the women, which means that the man only has to be aggressive enough to overpower or get the woman's attention, while the woman must make herself stand out above the rest. An extraordinarily smart woman will attract a man seeking companionship, while an unbelievably brainless one won't intimidate a man who only wants something to f**k. Being an average woman affords you no real advantage in human mating circles, unless you're hoping to attract the elusive anonymous male which are terrified of extremes.

Do you live in Texas, or Kansas?
If so, I might know who you are.

>Uh engineering doesn't require that much intelligence
Anybody who says this has no idea what they are talking about.

It may require intelligence but it sure as hell doesn't require any common sense

>engineering
>not intelligent
F**K YOU
without civil engineers your house wouldnt have a f**king foundation

thoughts on whether a man can get raped or not?

In my grade at school we had 4 extremist personalities amongst the guys(and maybe 3/4 others who weren't as extremist but still interesting and opinionated) 1 was a metalhead to the extreme who would constantly rag out pop culture and worked out to a point where he became ridiculously buff and thought about alot of other things critically, another was a hardcore communist who could recite like paragraphs upon paragraphs of the communist manifesto, and then turned into a massive existentialist hippie, and another guy who was all into politics and public opinions on things, and myself who is pretty much into everything but my main issue in highschool was how extremely religious I was and how I changed to be extremely agnostic. There were no girls, smart or stupid, that were genuinely interested in such a broad range of things, with the ability to think logically about them all. None of them ever changed their opinions following a debate (in fact i don't think any of them ever even debated anything) and to me that's proof of women being interested in simpler things

3 guys you know? Huh? I'm pretty sure Communist/socialist movements in the US are female dominated if anything.
But you are right that females rarely debate sh*t unless they actually give a sh*t about the other person's point of view.

What are your thoughts on the fact that women are more emotional than men and men are more logical than women?

It may require intelligence but it sure as hell doesn't require any common sense

typical answer for someone who actually doesn't understand engineering
fact of the matter is, students who can only memorize formulas are doomed for failure
those who know their sh*t and ask questions eventually get their PEs and become awesome

>Anybody who says this has no idea what they are talking about.
Uh yes I do. I was raised by two engineers know a lot of engineers they might have to study more but in general they are painfully average.

Really I was raised by 2 engineers also, they are painfully intelligent.

Bitch or Colonize This or something classic like Backlash.

follow up on this... have you ever read de Beauvoir's "The Second Sex"? I've heard it is considered the definitive feminism text and that it sparked a second wave of feminism that to an ammendment to the civil rights act thirty years later to include the provisions specified in title IX. BTW am male feminist, do those even exist?

In my grade at school we had 4 extremist personalities amongst the guys(and maybe 3/4 others who weren't as extremist but still interesting and opinionated) 1 was a metalhead to the extreme who would constantly rag out pop culture and worked out to a point where he became ridiculously buff and thought about alot of other things critically, another was a hardcore communist who could recite like paragraphs upon paragraphs of the communist manifesto, and then turned into a massive existentialist hippie, and another guy who was all into politics and public opinions on things, and myself who is pretty much into everything but my main issue in highschool was how extremely religious I was and how I changed to be extremely agnostic. There were no girls, smart or stupid, that were genuinely interested in such a broad range of things, with the ability to think logically about them all. None of them ever changed their opinions following a debate (in fact i don't think any of them ever even debated anything) and to me that's proof of women being interested in simpler things

>tiny sample size
>anecdotal evidence
>no variables accounted for
>proof
never change, american school system. never change.

I don't think that's true.
I seem to remember reading somewhere that the average intelligence is the same for men and women (actually, it might be higher for women, but I can't remember for sure and I don't remember where I saw this), but the standard deviations are different. There are a lot more women whose intelligence is close to the average. Whereas men are more spread out: there are more geniuses, but also more idiots.
Not that any of this matters. You can't just take a statistic like that and apply it to random people you meet on the street. "Oh hai, I'm a guy, so I'm smarter than you!" Yeah... no.

as far as i'm concerned that's because women are pigeonholed into certain roles in society, whereas men either develop new technologies/intellectual things to further society and others work hard slave labouring to keep everyone alive, whereas women generally have to take at least 5 years off their professional lives (far more in the past) to raise children so they never got as good at single things, but they'd need moderate amounts of intelligence for the tasks they'd need to do

Do you live in Texas, or Kansas?
If so, I might know who you are.

Nope.

>engineering
>not intelligent
F**K YOU
without civil engineers your house wouldnt have a f**king foundation

And without janitors your workplace toilet would smell godawful. Who gives a sh*t.

>engineering
>not intelligent
F**K YOU
without civil engineers your house wouldnt have a f**king foundation

Ooooh civil engineering. they time traffic signals and sewer systems. plenty of intense action in that field.
>implying I have a low opinion of civil engineers

thoughts on whether a man can get raped or not?

Of course they can be raped.

What are your thoughts on the fact that women are more emotional than men and men are more logical than women?

Not a fact. Men repeatedly demonstrate far less common sense and logic, and as far as I can tell the claim about women being "more emotional" boils down to "cry more".

The bulk of your post was about people you knew in high school and their interests tended to shake out. That is not only the definition of anecdotal, it is stupid. The mere suggestion that you could extrapolate something about the natural tendencies of the sexes based on a sample that small with so many uncontrolled variables at work borders on offensive in its complete lack of scientific value.
As for the two points, that means very little given the fact that an individual's IQ will vary about that much or a little more from test session to test session and that the SD for most IQ tests is 15 points.
A more interesting question about sex and IQ is why women tend toward the mean, while men are overrepresented at both extremes of the scale.

shut the f**k up about science, you can't measure people's genuine interests by science.
it wasn't just highschool, it's in my family (my brother is interested in all sorts of musics and stuff, while my sister is far more normal and goes with the flow)
i was in a program in the military for one year which was 50/50, and while all the guys got interested in the military, the weapons, politics, and tactics/strategies, the girls remained disinsterested until it came to any form of testing.

Really I was raised by 2 engineers also, they are painfully intelligent.

To a retard even the painfully average can seem amazingly intelligent.

Nope.

And without janitors your workplace toilet would smell godawful. Who gives a sh*t.

You shat on the field on engineering. I don't think you know this, but they like a lot of respect because they sat through 4 years of classes, working their asses off while the other majors went to parties and sh*t. We saw our very friends drop engineering, because it was too hard (and they wanted to party too), but we stuck through it. We took the thermo classes, we took the statics classes, we took our systems classes, we took more math than any human should have to take, and we got our PE. You spit on the profession of professions and you must now pay for your crimes.

follow up on this... have you ever read de Beauvoir's "The Second Sex"? I've heard it is considered the definitive feminism text and that it sparked a second wave of feminism that to an ammendment to the civil rights act thirty years later to include the provisions specified in title IX. BTW am male feminist, do those even exist?

Of course male feminists exist. I never read the Second Sex to be fair I'm pretty new at being an active feminist.

How do you deal with sycophancy from men? If I were a woman I would go nuts worrying that my gender (even if I were ugly) "tipped the scales" in my favor all the time.
How do rigorous feminists defend cosmetics and general primping?

To a retard even the painfully average can seem amazingly intelligent.

oh lawdy...
>has made my day

>fa**ots undermining competent people who make their lives possible
whats f**king new, anonymous?

You shat on the field on engineering. I don't think you know this, but they like a lot of respect because they sat through 4 years of classes, working their asses off while the other majors went to parties and sh*t. We saw our very friends drop engineering, because it was too hard (and they wanted to party too), but we stuck through it. We took the thermo classes, we took the statics classes, we took our systems classes, we took more math than any human should have to take, and we got our PE. You spit on the profession of professions and you must now pay for your crimes.

Grats for getting a PE I make 100k and I never even got a degree.

To a retard even the painfully average can seem amazingly intelligent.

one has a Ph.D in Mechanical, the other a Masters in electrical. I then went on to get into the engineering program of a top 25 engineering university in the world, where I am currently a Junior. But yeah, I'm sure I'm the dumb one.

You shat on the field on engineering. I don't think you know this, but they like a lot of respect because they sat through 4 years of classes, working their asses off while the other majors went to parties and sh*t. We saw our very friends drop engineering, because it was too hard (and they wanted to party too), but we stuck through it. We took the thermo classes, we took the statics classes, we took our systems classes, we took more math than any human should have to take, and we got our PE. You spit on the profession of professions and you must now pay for your crimes.

f**k yeah engineers for life
(gonna take my FE this saturday haha)

3 guys you know? Huh? I'm pretty sure Communist/socialist movements in the US are female dominated if anything.
But you are right that females rarely debate sh*t unless they actually give a sh*t about the other person's point of view.

that's a job, not an interest. that's probably more to do with the nature of their views, not who is really a pioneer in their field so to speak.

Grats for getting a PE I make 100k and I never even got a degree.

Yeah, well, can't say i'm not jealous.

Grats for getting a PE I make 100k and I never even got a degree.

go nepotism!

How do you deal with sycophancy from men? If I were a woman I would go nuts worrying that my gender (even if I were ugly) "tipped the scales" in my favor all the time.
How do rigorous feminists defend cosmetics and general primping?

It creeps me out. And of course I don't worry about the scales tipping in my favor due to gender, I'm too busy worrying about the opposite. "OH NO SOMETHING MIGHT TURN OUT IN MY FAVOR". lol. Not a single person thinks like that not even white hetero upper class men.

shut the f**k up about science, you can't measure people's genuine interests by science.
it wasn't just highschool, it's in my family (my brother is interested in all sorts of musics and stuff, while my sister is far more normal and goes with the flow)
i was in a program in the military for one year which was 50/50, and while all the guys got interested in the military, the weapons, politics, and tactics/strategies, the girls remained disinsterested until it came to any form of testing.

Shut the f**k up about science?
Your posts about your buds in high school and your siblings have been bad attempts at psychology and social science. There are set methodologies and techniques professionals use to test the sort of hypothesis you're positing and standards used to evaluate data gathered and the analysis of said data.
You're doing science in your posts. You're just doing it spectacularly poorly. Don't get all pissy because I'm making sure the gallery is aware of your gross methodological failings.

typical answer for someone who actually doesn't understand engineering
fact of the matter is, students who can only memorize formulas are doomed for failure
those who know their sh*t and ask questions eventually get their PEs and become awesome

no it's an answer from someone who is and has worked around engineers for the last 10 years

How do you deal with sycophancy from men? If I were a woman I would go nuts worrying that my gender (even if I were ugly) "tipped the scales" in my favor all the time.
How do rigorous feminists defend cosmetics and general primping?

Oh yeah and feminists defend cosmetics by "my body my choice". I mean, cosmetics are basically a non-issue I didnt even realize they had to be defended. The only time they are brought up is because some women feel pressured into using them sometimes which is just about the biggest non-issue there is.

How do you deal with sycophancy from men? If I were a woman I would go nuts worrying that my gender (even if I were ugly) "tipped the scales" in my favor all the time.
How do rigorous feminists defend cosmetics and general primping?

not op, but the act of making onesself look appealing so that a mate will be interested isn't new. plus, men certainly try to make themselves look good, just in a different way.

Of course they can be raped.

Not a fact. Men repeatedly demonstrate far less common sense and logic, and as far as I can tell the claim about women being "more emotional" boils down to "cry more".

name some stereotypes/repeated observations you've made where men display less logic than women

what the f**k is this thread i dont even why

Of course they can be raped.

Not a fact. Men repeatedly demonstrate far less common sense and logic, and as far as I can tell the claim about women being "more emotional" boils down to "cry more".

Check out the picture and tell me you can deny that.

f**k yeah engineers for life
(gonna take my FE this saturday haha)

f**k yeah engineers for life
(gonna take my FE this saturday haha)

If you did well in your classes you hardly even need to study to pass it.

OP, just wanted to say you're fielding questions pretty well and keep up the good work.
Also, unrelated but I totally wandered into anonymous out of /sci/ and read this thread under the impression I was still there, going WTF WTF HOW IS SHE NOT GETTING REAMED WTF. Because /sci/ducks have so much pent-up tard rage towards girls and all.

name some stereotypes/repeated observations you've made where men display less logic than women

Stereotypes/observations you say? How about every single time some guy lights himself on fire/tries to jump off a roof into his pool and misses/kills himself trying to ghost ride the whip/kills himself in his motherf**king sandbox because he thinks he is naruto---9 times out of 10 it is a guy?
I don't want to generalize here, but when men say "LOL WOMEN ARE SO ILLOGICAL" they really mean "LOL WOMEN SURE HAVE A LOT OF SHOES DERP". Men and boys, on the other hand, constantly are the subject of (often comical) self injury and death due to fool ass sh*t. No common sense or forethought. In some ways it can be a good thing. Sometimes risks can be worth it. Sometimes its just stupid though. In any case.

If you did well in your classes you hardly even need to study to pass it.

hmm i still wonder if i should go general or specific
(can pick right before the test right)

name some stereotypes/repeated observations you've made where men display less logic than women

not OP here, but I see a lot of instances where men act highly illogical. Men are more likely to act like children than women: just today I was driving home and I saw a man swerving all over the place and open his door and yell at someone like he was a 9 year old. Men who engage in domestic violence is another example. Also I think most men are less diligent workers than women and tend to goof off and get distracted more on the job

Shut the f**k up about science?
Your posts about your buds in high school and your siblings have been bad attempts at psychology and social science. There are set methodologies and techniques professionals use to test the sort of hypothesis you're positing and standards used to evaluate data gathered and the analysis of said data.
You're doing science in your posts. You're just doing it spectacularly poorly. Don't get all pissy because I'm making sure the gallery is aware of your gross methodological failings.

oh man i could write a f**king essay about how using "science" in social psychology and so forth is complete bullsh*t and a useless way of ever getting anywhere in critical thinking about most important things in that field
when i was doing psychology once upon a time i had to do a question where I had to analyse "rosie walked through a field where she was stung on the foot by a bee. she is now afraid of fields"
i actually was meant to answer that. notably, most of the clever guys dropped out of the class and continued discussing things from their own observation, and getting alot further and developing actual opinions based on something while all the girls remained in the class and obediently ate up all the information the teachers fed them, and then regurgitated it for the exam and got some "i'm smart points" for university.

It creeps me out. And of course I don't worry about the scales tipping in my favor due to gender, I'm too busy worrying about the opposite. "OH NO SOMETHING MIGHT TURN OUT IN MY FAVOR". lol. Not a single person thinks like that not even white hetero upper class men.

I would be worried about it. I want to get by because of my skills, not because, for example, my new boss is gay and my only competition was a fat ugly guy.

Oh yeah and feminists defend cosmetics by "my body my choice". I mean, cosmetics are basically a non-issue I didnt even realize they had to be defended. The only time they are brought up is because some women feel pressured into using them sometimes which is just about the biggest non-issue there is.

But it's not your choice. Don't shave your armpits, a**hole, vagina, or legs and see how ostracized you'd be. As a man the worst I'll be called is a slob or a loser, but a woman will practically have her sanity doubted if she wore shorts with natural leg hair.

not op, but the act of making onesself look appealing so that a mate will be interested isn't new. plus, men certainly try to make themselves look good, just in a different way.

In a different way and with maybe 10% of the investment of time and money. Women are expected to expend an incredible amount of effort on "looking good" (which translates exactly to "looking attractive to men"). Not to mention it's promoting the entire system in the first place, teaching a new generation of young women to feel pride in their appearance instead of their achievements.

one has a Ph.D in Mechanical, the other a Masters in electrical. I then went on to get into the engineering program of a top 25 engineering university in the world, where I am currently a Junior. But yeah, I'm sure I'm the dumb one.

first off, I need to apologize, I should not have said what I did, much of it was based off of personal opinion and prejudice, and was not worth this discussion. All that I wish to (and should) express is my lack of interest in the field of civil engineering. I simply see the work you do as less groundbreaking compared to other fields like physics. But this doesn't mean engineering is any less important

Stereotypes/observations you say? How about every single time some guy lights himself on fire/tries to jump off a roof into his pool and misses/kills himself trying to ghost ride the whip/kills himself in his motherf**king sandbox because he thinks he is naruto---9 times out of 10 it is a guy?
I don't want to generalize here, but when men say "LOL WOMEN ARE SO ILLOGICAL" they really mean "LOL WOMEN SURE HAVE A LOT OF SHOES DERP". Men and boys, on the other hand, constantly are the subject of (often comical) self injury and death due to fool ass sh*t. No common sense or forethought. In some ways it can be a good thing. Sometimes risks can be worth it. Sometimes its just stupid though. In any case.

there are perfectly logical reasons to ghostride the whip
a.) sh*t's tight, yo
b.) i ain't no pu**y

OP, just wanted to say you're fielding questions pretty well and keep up the good work.
Also, unrelated but I totally wandered into anonymous out of /sci/ and read this thread under the impression I was still there, going WTF WTF HOW IS SHE NOT GETTING REAMED WTF. Because /sci/ducks have so much pent-up tard rage towards girls and all.

Do they? Damn I got to figure out a way to post some sort of thread while making casual reference to my gender...."female here" too obvious?

Do you dislike passive male chauvinism? I always hold the door for and try to be generally gentlemanly to everyone I meet, and especially women, but a lot of women seem to resent it. I've been yelled at twice for holding the door for or offering a woman my coat, and it's starting to be a little depressing.

I would be worried about it. I want to get by because of my skills, not because, for example, my new boss is gay and my only competition was a fat ugly guy.

But it's not your choice. Don't shave your armpits, a**hole, vagina, or legs and see how ostracized you'd be. As a man the worst I'll be called is a slob or a loser, but a woman will practically have her sanity doubted if she wore shorts with natural leg hair.

In a different way and with maybe 10% of the investment of time and money. Women are expected to expend an incredible amount of effort on "looking good" (which translates exactly to "looking attractive to men"). Not to mention it's promoting the entire system in the first place, teaching a new generation of young women to feel pride in their appearance instead of their achievements.

I think body hair on women is really sexy. I wish more american women would just let that sh*t go. Protip: if you're not a total fa**ot, you'd still f**k her

first off, I need to apologize, I should not have said what I did, much of it was based off of personal opinion and prejudice, and was not worth this discussion. All that I wish to (and should) express is my lack of interest in the field of civil engineering. I simply see the work you do as less groundbreaking compared to other fields like physics. But this doesn't mean engineering is any less important

f**king FINALLY
apology accepted
willing to drop the subject

Do they? Damn I got to figure out a way to post some sort of thread while making casual reference to my gender...."female here" too obvious?

Usually is, people saying that almost always get jumped on. However, if you wanted, you could probably just ditch the subtlety, stroll in and make a thread calmly asking to be shown scientific proof that women are inferior. That way, whether you make mention of your gender or not, they'll know that's what you want to talk about and won't accuse you of attentionwhoring and/or trolling.

Stereotypes/observations you say? How about every single time some guy lights himself on fire/tries to jump off a roof into his pool and misses/kills himself trying to ghost ride the whip/kills himself in his motherf**king sandbox because he thinks he is naruto---9 times out of 10 it is a guy?
I don't want to generalize here, but when men say "LOL WOMEN ARE SO ILLOGICAL" they really mean "LOL WOMEN SURE HAVE A LOT OF SHOES DERP". Men and boys, on the other hand, constantly are the subject of (often comical) self injury and death due to fool ass sh*t. No common sense or forethought. In some ways it can be a good thing. Sometimes risks can be worth it. Sometimes its just stupid though. In any case.

that has no link to intelligence whatsoever, they're just adrenaline junkies. SEEKING ADRENALINE RUSHES MORE PREVALENT IN MEN
could be a stupid douchebag who cleans streets all day or a college professor just in it for the fun, excellent point though you really made me realise how stupid my gender is!

I think body hair on women is really sexy. I wish more american women would just let that sh*t go. Protip: if you're not a total fa**ot, you'd still f**k her

Look at a picture of fully natural female body hair and ask yourself if you find that sh*t sexy. It would qualify as a fetish if you do, because it's that rare to see it in modern society.

Stereotypes/observations you say? How about every single time some guy lights himself on fire/tries to jump off a roof into his pool and misses/kills himself trying to ghost ride the whip/kills himself in his motherf**king sandbox because he thinks he is naruto---9 times out of 10 it is a guy?
I don't want to generalize here, but when men say "LOL WOMEN ARE SO ILLOGICAL" they really mean "LOL WOMEN SURE HAVE A LOT OF SHOES DERP". Men and boys, on the other hand, constantly are the subject of (often comical) self injury and death due to fool ass sh*t. No common sense or forethought. In some ways it can be a good thing. Sometimes risks can be worth it. Sometimes its just stupid though. In any case.

living a little /= illogical
illogical is refusing to listen to someone's argument simply because you are set in your mind that you're right. Men do this as well but in general it's mainly women that believe they're never wrong.

there are perfectly logical reasons to ghostride the whip
a.) sh*t's tight, yo
b.) i ain't no pu**y

I haven't laughed that hard in a while

Do you dislike passive male chauvinism? I always hold the door for and try to be generally gentlemanly to everyone I meet, and especially women, but a lot of women seem to resent it. I've been yelled at twice for holding the door for or offering a woman my coat, and it's starting to be a little depressing.

Depends on how you do it. I've never been angry at a guy (I've been creeped out though).

Women are better for work. 90% of jobs have always involved some degree of physical labor, but in the end it's not the type of physical labor that is difficult for women.
Sure, hiring new people might be hard. But its impossible to predict who will still be around in 3 years and playing games with gender/age/race to try and guess is racist/sexist etc.
Men die more often than women do. Plain and simple. They are also lazier and demand higher salary.

So, you believe that stereotyping woman as less intelligent and less able to work is wrong, but yourself stereotype men as lazy?
I like your way of thinking.

oh man i could write a f**king essay about how using "science" in social psychology and so forth is complete bullsh*t and a useless way of ever getting anywhere in critical thinking about most important things in that field
when i was doing psychology once upon a time i had to do a question where I had to analyse "rosie walked through a field where she was stung on the foot by a bee. she is now afraid of fields"
i actually was meant to answer that. notably, most of the clever guys dropped out of the class and continued discussing things from their own observation, and getting alot further and developing actual opinions based on something while all the girls remained in the class and obediently ate up all the information the teachers fed them, and then regurgitated it for the exam and got some "i'm smart points" for university.

so by "doing psychology" you mean "studying it casually and getting nowhere near proficient in it as a discipline." and by "discussing things from their own observations" and "developing actual opinions" you mean "talked about stuff and adopted whatever fit most neatly with any number of potentially conflicting motivations such as prejudice, desire for personal validation, need for social acceptance and the like without actually subjecting any of these ideas to controlled tests."
cool pre-enlightenment thinking, bro.

living a little /= illogical
illogical is refusing to listen to someone's argument simply because you are set in your mind that you're right. Men do this as well but in general it's mainly women that believe they're never wrong.

Uh I can guarantee you women listen to your argument. They might not admit they are listening, but they do listen. I can guarantee it.
And if "living a little" results in injury/death then yes, it is illogical, at least from a female pov.

Arguments about the relative intelligence or sanity or impulsiveness of each gender from a biological standpoint have to be completely meaningless, don't they?
Men and women are subjected to totally different cultures, spanning all of human history. How are suicide or impulsivity statistics relevant when both genders behave completely differently for cultural reasons that are not only subject to change, but universally considered to be archaic?

So, you believe that stereotyping woman as less intelligent and less able to work is wrong, but yourself stereotype men as lazy?
I like your way of thinking.

But studies have proven men are in fact lazier. [citation needed]
Men are also jerks with huge dicks that I just can't seem to resist. I went through a lesbian phase during undergrad but now that I'm wanking my way through a liberal arts masters and not producing anything for society I figured I'd tell strangers on the internet all about the neat stuff I learned from other people.

>a woman will practically have her sanity doubted if she wore shorts with natural leg hair.
Er. People do this where I live, and it usually doesn't look horrifying at all. In fact, it looks fine, and usually I don't see the leg hair on other girls unless I'm looking for it. I think if you're in shape people won't be too scandalized, and if they are, well, f**k them.
I do agree that grooming yourself and taking care of yourself feels nice, though. Saying that feminist women shouldn't use cosmetics is like...saying that men who aren't chauvinists shouldn't work out, or something.

that has no link to intelligence whatsoever, they're just adrenaline junkies. SEEKING ADRENALINE RUSHES MORE PREVALENT IN MEN
could be a stupid douchebag who cleans streets all day or a college professor just in it for the fun, excellent point though you really made me realise how stupid my gender is!

It has a link to clear logical thinking. A logical person does not let their emotions control them, isn't that the whole point between the emotion/logic contrast? (I don't think the naruto kid who killed himself was in it for the adrenaline rush).

>a woman will practically have her sanity doubted if she wore shorts with natural leg hair.
Er. People do this where I live, and it usually doesn't look horrifying at all. In fact, it looks fine, and usually I don't see the leg hair on other girls unless I'm looking for it. I think if you're in shape people won't be too scandalized, and if they are, well, f**k them.
I do agree that grooming yourself and taking care of yourself feels nice, though. Saying that feminist women shouldn't use cosmetics is like...saying that men who aren't chauvinists shouldn't work out, or something.

Working out as a man is healthful and beneficial in tons of ways.
Buying and spending inordinate amounts of time applying expensive coloured paste to your face only attracts mates and makes men horny when they see you. How is that a good thing?

So, you believe that stereotyping woman as less intelligent and less able to work is wrong, but yourself stereotype men as lazy?
I like your way of thinking.

Incorrect stereotypes are wrong and correct stereotypes aren't. Holy sh*t what a revelation.

Incorrect stereotypes are wrong and correct stereotypes aren't. Holy sh*t what a revelation.

>trollface.jpeg

Uh I can guarantee you women listen to your argument. They might not admit they are listening, but they do listen. I can guarantee it.
And if "living a little" results in injury/death then yes, it is illogical, at least from a female pov.

....
Do you know how many sports and activities can result in injury or death? It's not illogical, it's called seeking adrenaline rushes.
Football, Rugby, Skydiving, and more.

BTW you should read this http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/bias-and-its-tinted-lens/200901/positive-prejudice-killing-kindn
ess-part-one
explains how stereotypes have their basis in the truth.

I only have one question:
Where is your selective service card?
You want equal rights? Bare equal responsibility.
QED

Working out as a man is healthful and beneficial in tons of ways.
Buying and spending inordinate amounts of time applying expensive coloured paste to your face only attracts mates and makes men horny when they see you. How is that a good thing?

Are you OP? If so, I think I just failed at trying to express the fact that I more or less agreed with you...
I'm not really talking about makeup. Personally, I don't wear any cosmetics except if I know I'll be seen under harsh lights (stages, speech, etc.) because then it serves a practical purpose. I'm talking about taking care of your body - using washes to keep your skin clear, maintaining your hair, removing body hair (if someone does that.) Makeup could fall under that if someone uses natural mineral gunk or whatever. Anyway, my point is that this is all what I consider just normal human grooming behavior - I like it, I like doing it, and I certainly am not doing it to mindlessly attract men.

Incorrect stereotypes are wrong and correct stereotypes aren't. Holy sh*t what a revelation.

But you must have realized that reality is subjective. Who, then, decides what stereotypes are wrong? If you can decide for yourself that men are lazier, then I must be able to do that, too. How, then, can you blame others for thinking that women are less intelligent and less capable of working?

Hey OP, can you tell me what the f**k this sh*t is all about?
http://www.lfwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Feminism#EASY_QUICK-START_GUIDE_TO_NOT_BEING_A_PATRIARCHA
L_DOUCHE

....
Do you know how many sports and activities can result in injury or death? It's not illogical, it's called seeking adrenaline rushes.
Football, Rugby, Skydiving, and more.

And placing emotion over your well being is illogical. Hope this helps.

Hey OP, can you tell me what the f**k this sh*t is all about?
http://www.lfwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Feminism#EASY_QUICK-START_GUIDE_TO_NOT_BEING_A_PATRIARCHA
L_DOUCHE

It appears to be an easy quick start guide to not being a patriarchal douche.

It has a link to clear logical thinking. A logical person does not let their emotions control them, isn't that the whole point between the emotion/logic contrast? (I don't think the naruto kid who killed himself was in it for the adrenaline rush).

I don't care to dredge through my pictures but I remember this thing that shows unspoken communication between females and between males. For females it had like 12 different "signs" that meant something whereas men just had eye contact. Logic means not trying to see something where there is nothing to be seen.

Working out as a man is healthful and beneficial in tons of ways.
Buying and spending inordinate amounts of time applying expensive coloured paste to your face only attracts mates and makes men horny when they see you. How is that a good thing?

>healthful
seriously though, i would be lying if i said that i didnt work out to attract females
unfortunately this doesnt fix my cowardice and i still have trouble asking anyone out

HEY OP YOU WANT EQUAL RIGHTS? I HOPE YOU SIGNED UP FOR THE DRAFT.
bitches and wh**res.

BTW you should read this http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/bias-and-its-tinted-lens/200901/positive-prejudice-killing-kindn
ess-part-one
explains how stereotypes have their basis in the truth.

Boy oh boy nothing like an article from psychology today for some intellectual stimulation I will definitely be bookmarking this.

I only have one question:
Where is your selective service card?
You want equal rights? Bare equal responsibility.
QED

I dont have a selective service card as technically women are banned from serving in many areas of the military. Its not feminists who are behind this btw and are actually working to change it. But you already know that.

I only have one question:
Where is your selective service card?
You want equal rights? Bare equal responsibility.
QED

>implying that feminists could snap their fingers tomorrow and make women eligible for the draft
>implying that we don't have an all-volunteer military
>implying that women in the military and their supporters haven't been trying to get women into combat roles for decades now
>implying that i just got trolled

I don't care to dredge through my pictures but I remember this thing that shows unspoken communication between females and between males. For females it had like 12 different "signs" that meant something whereas men just had eye contact. Logic means not trying to see something where there is nothing to be seen.

No it doesn't. I'm not even sure what the f**k you are talking about you are being so vague. Women have "12 signs"? This means they are trying to see things where there is nothing to be seen? Huh?

Has anybody here read "Schrodinger's Rapist"? Any thoughts on it?
http://kateharding.net/2009/10/08/guest-blogger-starling-schrodinger%E2%80%99s-rapist-or-a-guy%E2%80
%99s-guide-to-approaching-strange-women-without-being-maced/

Has anybody here read "Schrodinger's Rapist"? Any thoughts on it?
http://kateharding.net/2009/10/08/guest-blogger-starling-schrodinger%E2%80%99s-rapist-or-a-guy%E2%80
%99s-guide-to-approaching-strange-women-without-being-maced/

Never read it but I must say that the term "Shrodingers Rapist" has a lot of potential.

>healthful
seriously though, i would be lying if i said that i didnt work out to attract females
unfortunately this doesnt fix my cowardice and i still have trouble asking anyone out

It's fine if your express intent is to attract a mate. I think it's defensible (enough so anyway) to conform to your culture's standards of beauty to make your spouse happy.
The problem is women who spend their entire goddamn life placing all of their self-worth in phantom mate attraction. They're geared since birth to live life by proxy - attract but control men, eventually marry and leech off of them, and then "raise good children".
The main problem as I see it is that you keep a race as slaves for ten thousand years, never educate them past the bare essentials, then in the span of a single century give them the right to vote and start feeling guilty about all that patriarchy.
You're not dealing with the root of the problem. Women are going to waltz around being materialistic sluts, vampires for male attention - and men are going to play right into it until some eunuch visionary steps in and puts a halt to the process.
I think there's a Nietzsche quote about tolerating "four centuries of dilettantism" if anyone ever freed women.

And placing emotion over your well being is illogical. Hope this helps.

Hey OP, just wanted to share something with you.
The internet, while certainly great and all that, is quite lacking in terms of communicating. Debates on the internet do not follow the same rules as a debate held in real life.
With that said, if I were debating with one such as you in real life, I would swiftly and without hesitation rip out your heart and feed it to you.

Hey OP, just wanted to share something with you.
The internet, while certainly great and all that, is quite lacking in terms of communicating. Debates on the internet do not follow the same rules as a debate held in real life.
With that said, if I were debating with one such as you in real life, I would swiftly and without hesitation rip out your heart and feed it to you.

Hmm whats the phrase I'm looking for.....
u mad?

Hey OP, just wanted to share something with you.
The internet, while certainly great and all that, is quite lacking in terms of communicating. Debates on the internet do not follow the same rules as a debate held in real life.
With that said, if I were debating with one such as you in real life, I would swiftly and without hesitation rip out your heart and feed it to you.

you may have just demonstrated why internet arguments are in some cases preferrable. since nothing is physically damading, the only thing that can be hurt is pride and feelings

It's fine if your express intent is to attract a mate. I think it's defensible (enough so anyway) to conform to your culture's standards of beauty to make your spouse happy.
The problem is women who spend their entire goddamn life placing all of their self-worth in phantom mate attraction. They're geared since birth to live life by proxy - attract but control men, eventually marry and leech off of them, and then "raise good children".
The main problem as I see it is that you keep a race as slaves for ten thousand years, never educate them past the bare essentials, then in the span of a single century give them the right to vote and start feeling guilty about all that patriarchy.
You're not dealing with the root of the problem. Women are going to waltz around being materialistic sluts, vampires for male attention - and men are going to play right into it until some eunuch visionary steps in and puts a halt to the process.
I think there's a Nietzsche quote about tolerating "four centuries of dilettantism" if anyone ever freed women.

Well, hate to throw a wrench in the gears, but, um f**king sorta is the reason we exist. Life on Earth has sorta evolved to be good at that. It _IS_ the _ONLY_ meaningful part of your or my existence... so... yeah deal with it
p.s. Nietzsche was a jackass

you may have just demonstrated why internet arguments are in some cases preferrable. since nothing is physically damading, the only thing that can be hurt is pride and feelings

Well, unless you decide to become an hero

No it doesn't. I'm not even sure what the f**k you are talking about you are being so vague. Women have "12 signs"? This means they are trying to see things where there is nothing to be seen? Huh?

this is it

It's fine if your express intent is to attract a mate. I think it's defensible (enough so anyway) to conform to your culture's standards of beauty to make your spouse happy.
The problem is women who spend their entire goddamn life placing all of their self-worth in phantom mate attraction. They're geared since birth to live life by proxy - attract but control men, eventually marry and leech off of them, and then "raise good children".
The main problem as I see it is that you keep a race as slaves for ten thousand years, never educate them past the bare essentials, then in the span of a single century give them the right to vote and start feeling guilty about all that patriarchy.
You're not dealing with the root of the problem. Women are going to waltz around being materialistic sluts, vampires for male attention - and men are going to play right into it until some eunuch visionary steps in and puts a halt to the process.
I think there's a Nietzsche quote about tolerating "four centuries of dilettantism" if anyone ever freed women.

Well, hate to throw a wrench in the gears, but, um f**king sorta is the reason we exist. Life on Earth has sorta evolved to be good at that. It _IS_ the _ONLY_ meaningful part of your or my existence... so... yeah deal with it
p.s. Nietzsche was a jackass

grugnnghgh, you both sound right, I don't know who to believe. ok then, prove your point with the only language of pure truth that exists, Mathematics
by the way, I don't mean statistics, which are subject to interpretation, bias and corruption

Hmm whats the phrase I'm looking for.....
u mad?

Alas, my dear, I would do it not in anger, but in compassion.

Well, hate to throw a wrench in the gears, but, um f**king sorta is the reason we exist. Life on Earth has sorta evolved to be good at that. It _IS_ the _ONLY_ meaningful part of your or my existence... so... yeah deal with it
p.s. Nietzsche was a jackass

Who cares why I exist? Who cares what my biological instincts are? Life is about more than that. Every social instinct, every expression of curiosity and self-improvement is a denial of whatever sexual hedonism is at the base of my soul.
For ten millenia mankind has crawled out of the f**king jungles and gradually become more enlightened. We've made a sh*tload of mistakes and we're still burdened by the wreckage from more than half of them.
As far as I'm concerned, until someone finds a way to suppress sexual urges altogether, women are impossible to liberate and impossible to grant equality. You cannot live in harmony with a perpetual child who controls a scarce resource, and that's all women are at this point.
Also, whether you agree with him or not, Nietzsche was a visionary and a genius.

thanks for the thread femsy, farewell!

this is it

Not OP
A.) This is a drawing by a cartoonist rather than a vetted expert in human behavior. Furthermore, this is based on casual observation and not properly structured and monitored study. You're really going to cite this?
B.) Good for women if they really do that much on the spot analysis of everyone they meet. There's a very real semiotics of fashion, poise, and personal grooming and you can learn a lot about people and their relation to the social whole when you're aware of it.

this is it

Ah yes the unparalleled glimpse into the female psyche, Zits by ~60 year olds Jerry Scott+Jim Borgman. Excellent choice.
So Zits shows a comic where teen girls look at each others makeup. This is trying to ~see things which cannot be seen~ and this makes women in general illogical.
Airtight argument, princess.
Wait huh?

Alas, my dear, I would do it not in anger, but in compassion.

Uh damn when you are compassionate you make people eat their hearts. Wtf would you do if I made you angry?

Not OP
A.) This is a drawing by a cartoonist rather than a vetted expert in human behavior. Furthermore, this is based on casual observation and not properly structured and monitored study. You're really going to cite this?
B.) Good for women if they really do that much on the spot analysis of everyone they meet. There's a very real semiotics of fashion, poise, and personal grooming and you can learn a lot about people and their relation to the social whole when you're aware of it.

1. I like how you disprove my source and then immediately draw something you view as positive for women out of it.
2. Shows how women are superficial in their relations.

Ah yes the unparalleled glimpse into the female psyche, Zits by ~60 year olds Jerry Scott+Jim Borgman. Excellent choice.
So Zits shows a comic where teen girls look at each others makeup. This is trying to ~see things which cannot be seen~ and this makes women in general illogical.
Airtight argument, princess.
Wait huh?

I like by trying to prove that women are illogical he goes and cites a Zits comment proving beyond the shadow of a doubt that it is he is literally so retarded he needs someone to wipe up his drool.

let
x = number of individuals in a generation
y = number of offspring from each individual
z = number of members of next generation
n = number generations before species goes extinct
given that x/2*y=z and x-z tells us if the population is growing or shrinking...
in order for x-z to be a positive integer, then everyone must have two children. therefore, we need to devote as much time as possible to f**king to keep from going extinct.
** note i left out children dieing, and didn't really solve anything because ascii doesn't allow me to write integrals or anting fun without pulling my hairs out

this is it

i would check another guy out, but only in the gym ("damn, wish i had pecks like that" or "haha he's benchpressing 20lbs oh god")
in a work environment its pointless
while socializing it's hard to say. usually when an activity is involved (games, movies) then there's really no time to gauge your competition

When we finally switch to cloning and genetic modification as the primary means of reproduction for our species, your sex will become obsolete. Enjoy being needed for your womb while you can.

I like by trying to prove that women are illogical he goes and cites a Zits comment proving beyond the shadow of a doubt that it is he is literally so retarded he needs someone to wipe up his drool.

I like how you assume I'm a man.

When we finally switch to cloning and genetic modification as the primary means of reproduction for our species, your sex will become obsolete. Enjoy being needed for your womb while you can.

When we finally switch to cloning and genetic modification as the primary means of reproduction for our species, your sex will become obsolete. Enjoy being needed for your penis while you can.

The OP's responses tells me that any rational debate is impossible and thus a waste of time; namely the support for socialism while also touting a "just society" reeks of naivety, also the hypocritical condemning stereotypes while at the same time using stereotypes to your advance your argument i.e. this post

Stereotypes/observations you say? How about every single time some guy lights himself on fire/tries to jump off a roof into his pool and misses/kills himself trying to ghost ride the whip/kills himself in his motherf**king sandbox because he thinks he is naruto---9 times out of 10 it is a guy?
I don't want to generalize here, but when men say "LOL WOMEN ARE SO ILLOGICAL" they really mean "LOL WOMEN SURE HAVE A LOT OF SHOES DERP". Men and boys, on the other hand, constantly are the subject of (often comical) self injury and death due to fool ass sh*t. No common sense or forethought. In some ways it can be a good thing. Sometimes risks can be worth it. Sometimes its just stupid though. In any case.

there are several other points to be made but you get my drift.
However what this all boils down to though is you fishing for validation on the internet, so my advice to you is to get over yourself.

When we finally switch to cloning and genetic modification as the primary means of reproduction for our species, your sex will become obsolete. Enjoy being needed for your penis while you can.

lol @ you thinking women desire men as much as men desire women
come on man, think about it for a second. try looking at examples in the animal kingdom.

I like how you assume I'm a man.

Oh sorry ~princess~. Nobody gives a sh*t if you have tits or not, get over it.

Who cares why I exist? Who cares what my biological instincts are? Life is about more than that. Every social instinct, every expression of curiosity and self-improvement is a denial of whatever sexual hedonism is at the base of my soul.
For ten millenia mankind has crawled out of the f**king jungles and gradually become more enlightened. We've made a sh*tload of mistakes and we're still burdened by the wreckage from more than half of them.
As far as I'm concerned, until someone finds a way to suppress sexual urges altogether, women are impossible to liberate and impossible to grant equality. You cannot live in harmony with a perpetual child who controls a scarce resource, and that's all women are at this point.
Also, whether you agree with him or not, Nietzsche was a visionary and a genius.

um, no.
the point of life is to perpetuate itself. look up any classic definition of life and you'll find at the top of the list procreation. If a species were ever able to acquire the ability to disregard the urge to procreate, it would be a de-evolutionary step and that species would cease to exist. Furthermore, lets hope that YOU develop that ability and therefor do not pass it on to future generations.
The sooner everyone, male and female, stops giving a f**k about their differences and realizes that they are all the same in wanting to make babies, the better.
WE are NOT special. We are NOT better than animals. Pretty much the only thing that intelligence has given us is the ability to invent better ways of killing each other and a unique propensity to look down our noses at less evolved creatures incapable of lying to themselves about their higher sensibilities.
We exist to eat, f**k, and kill.
QED

When we finally switch to cloning and genetic modification as the primary means of reproduction for our species, your sex will become obsolete. Enjoy being needed for your penis while you can.

no way, the womb's gonna be obsolete first. that's like making an incubator, easy.

1. I like how you disprove my source and then immediately draw something you view as positive for women out of it.
2. Shows how women are superficial in their relations.

I did not "disprove" your source. A source can not be "disproven." I simply pointed out that it is a source of little merit. Also notice that I used the word "if" in my second point. That's a pretty serious qualifier.
What the comic shows is that the cartoonist believes women to be superficial in their relationships and that he mistakes a supposed (this is another one of those qualifying words, btw) awareness of the social meanings of signs for negative value judgements based on said signs and their meanings.
I swear, it's like none of you have been to college.

no way, the womb's gonna be obsolete first. that's like making an incubator, easy.

We are already really close to replacing the need for sperm actually.

Oh sorry ~princess~. Nobody gives a sh*t if you have tits or not, get over it.

lol half of the men on anonymous have tits too, to be fair.

When we finally switch to cloning and genetic modification as the primary means of reproduction for our species, your sex will become obsolete. Enjoy being needed for your penis while you can.

I'd like to see what would happen in a society without men. We've already seen the massive amount of progress the human race has achieved while men are leading the way. Let's see what happens if women take over.

Hey how's it going

When we finally switch to cloning and genetic modification as the primary means of reproduction for our species, your sex will become obsolete. Enjoy being needed for your womb while you can.

When we finally switch to cloning and genetic modification as the primary means of reproduction for our species, your sex will become obsolete. Enjoy being needed for your penis while you can.

Doesn't anyone watch stargate? That didn't work out so well for the asgard - you can't clone for every. there is no way to preserve the genetic code indefinitely sexual reproduction is natures way of refreshing the genome

Jesus Christ, you all suck. Am I the only one who doesn't give a f**k about gender? Most gender differences are pretty obviously societal, anyway. Judge people based on who they are, not what they are.

When we finally switch to cloning and genetic modification as the primary means of reproduction for our species, your sex will become obsolete. Enjoy being needed for your penis while you can.

LOL, you actually think that it'll be a woman who comes up with the technology to do so.
Why are most scientists men? Because women are usually too f**king lazy and dumb to complete the necessary college courses.
Your womb will be replaced with a martini shaker.

lol @ you thinking women desire men as much as men desire women
come on man, think about it for a second. try looking at examples in the animal kingdom.

...um. I do not think you understood the point of my post.

um, no.
the point of life is to perpetuate itself. look up any classic definition of life and you'll find at the top of the list procreation. If a species were ever able to acquire the ability to disregard the urge to procreate, it would be a de-evolutionary step and that species would cease to exist. Furthermore, lets hope that YOU develop that ability and therefor do not pass it on to future generations.
The sooner everyone, male and female, stops giving a f**k about their differences and realizes that they are all the same in wanting to make babies, the better.
WE are NOT special. We are NOT better than animals. Pretty much the only thing that intelligence has given us is the ability to invent better ways of killing each other and a unique propensity to look down our noses at less evolved creatures incapable of lying to themselves about their higher sensibilities.
We exist to eat, f**k, and kill.
QED

What you're describing is philosophical suicide. The reason you exist, the reason there are so many humans, the reason your mother didn't die in childbirth, the reason you are going to live past 30, etc etc etc.. all because of non-sexual distractions like science, craftsmanship, etc.
Even if you're going by the pleasure principle ("I DO IT BECAUSE IT FEELS GOOD") it's still a meaningless argument. Because we, as animals, are compelled to do something, means nothing whatsoever.
We are better than animals in that we are questioning and self-improving. Existential angst wouldn't exist, and neither would hamburgers, if people were content to sit around f**king all the time.

lol @ you thinking women desire men as much as men desire women
come on man, think about it for a second. try looking at examples in the animal kingdom.

>implying that the reproductive instincts of animals don't vary wildly between species

Doesn't anyone watch stargate? That didn't work out so well for the asgard - you can't clone for every. there is no way to preserve the genetic code indefinitely sexual reproduction is natures way of refreshing the genome

HEY F**K YOU
GO SPACE MARINES!

We are already really close to replacing the need for sperm actually.

lol half of the men on anonymous have tits too, to be fair.

okay prove we don't need sperm dummy

I'd like to see what would happen in a society without men. We've already seen the massive amount of progress the human race has achieved while men are leading the way. Let's see what happens if women take over.

It'll be just like Bonobo chimps. F**king+sucking as far as the eye can see. Now THATS living, none of this "light myself on fire hurp durp" sh*t.

When we finally switch to cloning and genetic modification as the primary means of reproduction for our species, your sex will become obsolete. Enjoy being needed for your womb while you can.

>Implying that mass artificial procreation is something an overpopulated planet desires.
ohyou.jpg

LOL, you actually think that it'll be a woman who comes up with the technology to do so.
Why are most scientists men? Because women are usually too f**king lazy and dumb to complete the necessary college courses.
Your womb will be replaced with a martini shaker.

>implying the ability to be a scientist has something to do with completing college courses
I mean yeah you need a degree to get anywhere, but...saying "women can't be scientists, they DON'T COMPLETE COLLEGE COURSES HERF DERF" is...strange. What happened to "they're not smart enough" or "male scientists are superior" or all that other good stuff? Or are you just trollan'?

HEY F**K YOU
GO SPACE MARINES!

Space Marines are recruited and enhanced

>Implying that mass artificial procreation is something an overpopulated planet desires.
ohyou.jpg

>implying that it wouldn't actually bring the population under control within a single generation.

It'll be just like Bonobo chimps. F**king+sucking as far as the eye can see. Now THATS living, none of this "light myself on fire hurp durp" sh*t.

I've bet you've never lit yourself on fire.
It's pretty f**king awesome.

What you're describing is philosophical suicide. The reason you exist, the reason there are so many humans, the reason your mother didn't die in childbirth, the reason you are going to live past 30, etc etc etc.. all because of non-sexual distractions like science, craftsmanship, etc.
Even if you're going by the pleasure principle ("I DO IT BECAUSE IT FEELS GOOD") it's still a meaningless argument. Because we, as animals, are compelled to do something, means nothing whatsoever.
We are better than animals in that we are questioning and self-improving. Existential angst wouldn't exist, and neither would hamburgers, if people were content to sit around f**king all the time.

LOL the fact that it's existential means it doesnt _really_ exist now doesn't it?
And, no, i disagree. The reason we self-improve is to find better ways of eating, f**king and killing each other.
besides, science has very little to do with the population growth of humans. It's been pretty much exponential for a long time. If anything, well developed nations have population declines and there's strong evidence that technological advancement slows population growth dramatically, mostly because we liberate our women and allow them to decide not to have children

Space Marines are recruited and enhanced

With the same genetic code.
Hurf Dur

>implying that it wouldn't actually bring the population under control within a single generation.

>implying that adding more fuel to a fire is going to make it stop burning

>implying the ability to be a scientist has something to do with completing college courses
I mean yeah you need a degree to get anywhere, but...saying "women can't be scientists, they DON'T COMPLETE COLLEGE COURSES HERF DERF" is...strange. What happened to "they're not smart enough" or "male scientists are superior" or all that other good stuff? Or are you just trollan'?

You can be a scientist without a degree, just don't expect a university to let you do research in their labs.

I've bet you've never lit yourself on fire.
It's pretty f**king awesome.

I'm going to ghostride the whip. on fire. off of a ledge. into a pool.
sh*t will be so cash.

>implying that adding more fuel to a fire is going to make it stop burning

>implying that we didn't start the fire
It was always burning since the world's been turning.

>implying that adding more fuel to a fire is going to make it stop burning

When we get the technology to create children whenever we want, people will likely stop having children on their own, meaning that the population can be regulated.

LOL the fact that it's existential means it doesnt _really_ exist now doesn't it?
And, no, i disagree. The reason we self-improve is to find better ways of eating, f**king and killing each other.
besides, science has very little to do with the population growth of humans. It's been pretty much exponential for a long time. If anything, well developed nations have population declines and there's strong evidence that technological advancement slows population growth dramatically, mostly because we liberate our women and allow them to decide not to have children

There are more impulses than procreation. Eunuchs and asexuals still manage to find things to do.
Again, just because something is natural doesn't mean it's superior.
We improve ourselves for many reasons. Most of them goal-oriented, yeah, but plenty of them are for "pure" curiosity, or ethical, theological..

When we get the technology to create children whenever we want, people will likely stop having children on their own, meaning that the population can be regulated.

Are you retarded?
We've had that ability for ~35 years

Get the f**k out bitch

When we get the technology to create children whenever we want, people will likely stop having children on their own, meaning that the population can be regulated.

This. Even moreso if we placed a mandatory limit on how many descendants each person could have.

>implying that adding more fuel to a fire is going to make it stop burning

>implying that a government which decides to replace reproduction with cloning wouldn't pass laws which severely limit the ability of people to squirt out their little defective pu**y fruits.

Are you retarded?
We've had that ability for ~35 years

I'm talking about it being the primary source of reproduction.

This. Even moreso if we placed a mandatory limit on how many descendants each person could have.

Kind of like Ender's Game.

I'm talking about it being the primary source of reproduction.

I don't know what you THINK you're implying, but i know what you said:
"When we get the technology to create children whenever we want, people will likely stop having children on their own, meaning that the population can be regulated."
we have the technology, people haven't stopped having children on their own. Sex is fun, and making love while you're *trying* to make a new life is perhaps one of the most amazing moments in any persons life. P.S. coming inside my wife has never felt that good. lol

I don't know what you THINK you're implying, but i know what you said:
"When we get the technology to create children whenever we want, people will likely stop having children on their own, meaning that the population can be regulated."
we have the technology, people haven't stopped having children on their own. Sex is fun, and making love while you're *trying* to make a new life is perhaps one of the most amazing moments in any persons life. P.S. coming inside my wife has never felt that good. lol

I agree. I've come inside your wife and I wouldn't trade it for anything in the world.

I don't know what you THINK you're implying, but i know what you said:
"When we get the technology to create children whenever we want, people will likely stop having children on their own, meaning that the population can be regulated."
we have the technology, people haven't stopped having children on their own. Sex is fun, and making love while you're *trying* to make a new life is perhaps one of the most amazing moments in any persons life. P.S. coming inside my wife has never felt that good. lol

First off, I'm not implying anything, I'm saying it outright, and secondly if you even bothered to read through what was being quoted, you'd realize that it started with
>When we finally switch to cloning and genetic modification as the PRIMARY means of reproduction for our species, your sex will become obsolete. Enjoy being needed for your womb while you can.

I don't know what you THINK you're implying, but i know what you said:
"When we get the technology to create children whenever we want, people will likely stop having children on their own, meaning that the population can be regulated."
we have the technology, people haven't stopped having children on their own. Sex is fun, and making love while you're *trying* to make a new life is perhaps one of the most amazing moments in any persons life. P.S. coming inside my wife has never felt that good. lol

You'd still cum inside your wife, you just wouldn't have children that way... What with the supposedly better birth control in the time when the primary reproduction tool would be artificial.

if you could have kids without any of the hassle it'd raise a lot more important problems than practical ones like "how do we get those luddite catholics to stop doing it the old fashioned way lmao"

>implying that a government which decides to replace reproduction with cloning wouldn't pass laws which severely limit the ability of people to squirt out their little defective pu**y fruits.

Well, unless you live in China, the chances of your ideas ever coming out of the hypothetical stage are slim to none. People are not going to give up their rights to natural birth, and will continue to procreate even if a government attempts to regulate it (derpchina). If anything, cloning will be looked at as an alternative option for those who cannot conceive children on their own. You will never remove cream pies from the equation.

if you could have kids without any of the hassle it'd raise a lot more important problems than practical ones like "how do we get those luddite catholics to stop doing it the old fashioned way lmao"

There's an episode of stargate about that too.
the "natural birthers" and the clones have a war

I must ask you: What is a man?

Do you feel that a woman who goes to a party and voluntarily imbibes 5 cups of the jungle juice, goes back to a room with an anonymous man and has anonymous sex should be held accountable for her actions or do you believe men should be held to the double standard that men under the influence of alcohol are responsible for their actions while a woman can claim rape under the influence?

There's an episode of stargate about that too.
the "natural birthers" and the clones have a war

that the one where they live underground and use those aerial drones? f**k that was good. early sg-1, come back to me! your spinoffs are sh*t!

I must ask you: What is a man?

...A MISERABLE LITTLE PILE OF SECRETS!!!

...A MISERABLE LITTLE PILE OF SECRETS!!!

But what can change his nature?

that the one where they live underground and use those aerial drones? f**k that was good. early sg-1, come back to me! your spinoffs are sh*t!

I know, right? Total win