Thursday, September 2, 2010

Women undress for pre-recorded attractive man, part 2

In case you missed the thread yesterday, I am currently under the process of scientifically proving that women, in general, are indeed Bitches and Wh**res. Some will fail to see the significance of such research, but none the less I intend to thoroughly prove Bitches and Wh**res theory beyond shadow of doubt.
These samples are obtained through random sampling: samples are drawn at random hours over 2 months. During the process of sampling, different loops on scale of 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) of physical attractiveness are used. Loops on the scale of 1 to 5 feature a male subject of similar/same mannerisms and personalities - with the only difference being physical attractiveness. This ensures the samples obtained display a broad range of female responses to varying degree of physical attractiveness. Some videos are blocked/ended abruptly for purposes of anonymity for the female subject.
Canada.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=NT673VMN

Previous thread: here.



In case you missed the thread yesterday, I am currently under the process of scientifically proving that women, in general, are indeed Bitches and Wh**res. Some will fail to see the significance of such research, but none the less I intend to thoroughly prove Bitches and Wh**res theory beyond shadow of doubt.
These samples are obtained through random sampling: samples are drawn at random hours over 2 months. During the process of sampling, different loops on scale of 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) of physical attractiveness are used. Loops on the scale of 1 to 5 feature a male subject of similar/same mannerisms and personalities - with the only difference being physical attractiveness. This ensures the samples obtained display a broad range of female responses to varying degree of physical attractiveness. Some videos are blocked/ended abruptly for purposes of anonymity for the female subject.
Canada.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=NT673VMN

>Scientifically proving Bitches and Wh**res: One random sample at a time.
I salute you, sir. I salute you.

Canada and donna were the only good ones. That other fat wh**re didn't even do anything.

>megaupload
sweet now I dont have to do-
>The video unavailable

The statstical breakdown thus far using loop5 (highest on the scale) are as follows: samples collected using loop5 (highest on the scale), 84% of females encountered respond with curiosity, followed quickly by eagerness and flirtatiousness. Out of those 84% whom respond, 76% continued to show eagerness and responded favorably to commands then moved on to displaying themselves. The % missing from 84% inludes factors such as: disconnection, lack of interest or response, failure to comply with command, and delayed response causing loop command disorder. Average interaction length in this category: 00:13:49.
Canada and donna were the only good ones. That other fat wh**re didn't even do anything.

I got muted for re-uploading images from yesterday. F**k. Anyways today I will be presenting new evidence to satisfy both anon's fapping and intellectual needs.

Donna.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=DCYS1X8Q

>women are bitches and wh**res because they are attracted to attractive men, who are by definition attractive, in superficial online encounters
>implying guys aren't the same way

Here is an interesting stat for you "averaged" bodied individuals: samples collected using loop3 (median on the scale), 42% of females encountered respond with curiosity, followed quickly by eagerness and flirtatiousness. Out of those 42% whom responded, 11% continued to show eagerness and responded favorably to commands then moved on to displaying themselves. The largest contributing factor to the % missing from 11% is lack of sexual interest, followed by disconnection. Average interaction length in this category: 00:05:21.
Nice_one.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=1MUMKKJ9

In case you missed the thread yesterday, I am currently under the process of scientifically proving that women, in general, are indeed Bitches and Wh**res. Some will fail to see the significance of such research, but none the less I intend to thoroughly prove Bitches and Wh**res theory beyond shadow of doubt.
These samples are obtained through random sampling: samples are drawn at random hours over 2 months. During the process of sampling, different loops on scale of 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) of physical attractiveness are used. Loops on the scale of 1 to 5 feature a male subject of similar/same mannerisms and personalities - with the only difference being physical attractiveness. This ensures the samples obtained display a broad range of female responses to varying degree of physical attractiveness. Some videos are blocked/ended abruptly for purposes of anonymity for the female subject.
Canada.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=NT673VMN

you are my new favorite tripf**.
godspeed sir

N=127 ATM. And no, N=127 does not mean 127 videos. Not every single sample drawn end in "success", given that loop used when drawing each sample is chosen at random. And no, I will not release these loops until my research is done, knowing how quickly these loops spread would simply hinder my progress. And no, I will not ruin these individuals' life despite the fact that when using loop5 emails, location, names, are liberally exchanged - stark contrast to loop3 where no traceable (email, location) information is exchanged.
Russian.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=V4WJMDHL

female here. I hypothesize that this experiment will prove to be very very successful.

Sir, you are a god among men.
Proceed being awesome.

This is one of the dumbest threads I've yet to see on this board

Go on my friend, prove what I already knew.

OP is an idiot. Men are just as shallow.

This is one of the dumbest threads I've yet to see on this board

u just mad cause it's true
oalodla

It is baffling that you people insist that women are bad for being attracted to hot guys

Men would do the same thing except they'll accept slightly less attractive women because guys are just so damn desperate for female attention. You are now aware that all people are bitches and wh**res, and will take whatever is the best they can get, rejecting everything beneath that.

What shocks me most is the sluts don't realize it's a loop. Don't those bitches know to ask you to touch your nose?

These findings are consistent through out every single nationality, with the largest representation being USA. On the topic of BITCHES AND WH**RES: when the female subject is posed with the question "boyfriend?" using loop5 (highest on the scale), 21% responded stating "yes". When the female subject is posed with the question "boyfriend?" using loop3 (median on the scale), 86% responded stating "yes". In instances where same sample drawn twice under loop5 (highest on the scale) and loop3 (median on the scale), the chance of conflicting answers to "boyfriend?" is 79%. What does this mean, exactly? Well if you are as hot as my guido friend here, women are more likely to lie to make themselves available to you than if you were an average bodied individual. Sort of makes you question the foundation of your relationsh*ts, doesn't it? Bitches and wh**res.
portuguese.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=W0CIJF5Z

So... you're proving women will be more likely to get their tits out for attractive looking guys?
NO F**KING SH*T SHERLOCK

I honestly don't know whether to laugh or cry. This is either a beautiful piece of trolling or the most genuinely pathetic thing I've ever seen.

So... you're proving women will be more likely to get their tits out for attractive looking guys?
NO F**KING SH*T SHERLOCK

76% is still quite high.

I want to know what even goes through anonymous's heads in times like these
How dumb are you f**kers?

These findings are consistent through out every single nationality, with the largest representation being USA. On the topic of BITCHES AND WH**RES: when the female subject is posed with the question "boyfriend?" using loop5 (highest on the scale), 21% responded stating "yes". When the female subject is posed with the question "boyfriend?" using loop3 (median on the scale), 86% responded stating "yes". In instances where same sample drawn twice under loop5 (highest on the scale) and loop3 (median on the scale), the chance of conflicting answers to "boyfriend?" is 79%. What does this mean, exactly? Well if you are as hot as my guido friend here, women are more likely to lie to make themselves available to you than if you were an average bodied individual. Sort of makes you question the foundation of your relationsh*ts, doesn't it? Bitches and wh**res.
portuguese.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=W0CIJF5Z

Everything up until this point was common sense, but this.
Truly, bitches and wh**res.

This doesn't really prove much other than that women prefer to cyber with attractive men.

people are attracted to attractive people
derp de derp derp

im not gay but this guy is hot so about any girl would f**k him, its only biological for them to want to. It doesn't help prove that they are bitches and wh**res even though its true that they are.
tl;dr OP you wasted alot of time with videos/upload crunching numbers for no reason

This clearly disputes the point that I have concluded from having females frequently tell me that "Girls don't care about looks as much as guys, its more about their personality for us". godspeed dr. bitches and wh**res, cause this just shoves that bullsh*t right up their filthy shallow c**ts.

Lets try the experiment when it's a really hot girl? Hmm?
Men are even bigger bitches and wh**res, I think you'll find. :)

This clearly disputes the point that I have concluded from having females frequently tell me that "Girls don't care about looks as much as guys, its more about their personality for us". godspeed dr. bitches and wh**res, cause this just shoves that bullsh*t right up their filthy shallow c**ts.

So basically you're saying that they CAN'T be attracted to hot guys
ffs people...

Anyway I am fairly ripped, not as tan, but possibly even better shape than this dude, how long does it take you to find a girl? I tried yesterday and found nothing, turns me one when a girl watches me fap. But as for your research, I bet every second camera is a video of a guy jerking it, so what are men?

These findings are consistent through out every single nationality, with the largest representation being USA. On the topic of BITCHES AND WH**RES: when the female subject is posed with the question "boyfriend?" using loop5 (highest on the scale), 21% responded stating "yes". When the female subject is posed with the question "boyfriend?" using loop3 (median on the scale), 86% responded stating "yes". In instances where same sample drawn twice under loop5 (highest on the scale) and loop3 (median on the scale), the chance of conflicting answers to "boyfriend?" is 79%. What does this mean, exactly? Well if you are as hot as my guido friend here, women are more likely to lie to make themselves available to you than if you were an average bodied individual. Sort of makes you question the foundation of your relationsh*ts, doesn't it? Bitches and wh**res.
portuguese.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=W0CIJF5Z

Female hypergamy proven once more.

These findings are consistent through out every single nationality, with the largest representation being USA. On the topic of BITCHES AND WH**RES: when the female subject is posed with the question "boyfriend?" using loop5 (highest on the scale), 21% responded stating "yes". When the female subject is posed with the question "boyfriend?" using loop3 (median on the scale), 86% responded stating "yes". In instances where same sample drawn twice under loop5 (highest on the scale) and loop3 (median on the scale), the chance of conflicting answers to "boyfriend?" is 79%. What does this mean, exactly? Well if you are as hot as my guido friend here, women are more likely to lie to make themselves available to you than if you were an average bodied individual. Sort of makes you question the foundation of your relationsh*ts, doesn't it? Bitches and wh**res.
portuguese.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=W0CIJF5Z

That statistic about women lying about their boyfriends is the only "bitches and wh**res"-worthy thing so far.
But man, bitches and wh**res. Do continue, I enjoy seeing women masturbate.

ITT: females come in to say this is stupid or say men are the same way in an attempt to defend themselves

This clearly disputes the point that I have concluded from having females frequently tell me that "Girls don't care about looks as much as guys, its more about their personality for us". godspeed dr. bitches and wh**res, cause this just shoves that bullsh*t right up their filthy shallow c**ts.

What girls want for relationships and for sex can be different. You, as a man, would probably hook up with a hot stupid chick (even if you'd never date her). But if you were looking to actually date someone, you'd take a less hot girl if she had a great personality, wouldn't you?

ITT: females come in to say this is stupid or say men are the same way in an attempt to defend themselves

Because it is dumbass. How is the fact that girls are attracted to attractive guys even noteworthy


So basically you're saying that they CAN'T be attracted to hot guys
ffs people...

I'm saying that they care about looks just as much as guys do, even though they try to put up the facade of caring about personality instead. This man is simply proving that point.


Because it is dumbass. How is the fact that girls are attracted to attractive guys even noteworthy

>Hasn't read the part about boyfriends


I'm saying that they care about looks just as much as guys do, even though they try to put up the facade of caring about personality instead. This man is simply proving that point.

see

What girls want for relationships and for sex can be different. You, as a man, would probably hook up with a hot stupid chick (even if you'd never date her). But if you were looking to actually date someone, you'd take a less hot girl if she had a great personality, wouldn't you?

Come on people, THINK.

My god, new stuff already? Let s see what bitches been up to.


>Hasn't read the part about boyfriends

That really is the only bad thing in this thread, but to be honest I know of a great many men who have done the same thing
Get over it


What girls want for relationships and for sex can be different. You, as a man, would probably hook up with a hot stupid chick (even if you'd never date her). But if you were looking to actually date someone, you'd take a less hot girl if she had a great personality, wouldn't you?

I agree with you, however, my point was that females emphasize the fact that looks don't mean much to them, even though that is counter to the facts we are being shown. Thus women are manipulative liars who should actually be up front about their physical desires.


That really is the only bad thing in this thread, but to be honest I know of a great many men who have done the same thing
Get over it

No, you disregarded it until I pointed it out and then decided to ignore it.
I'm going to stick with the idea that you're a little anus pained over what OP has going on here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
/thread

You know...if you put this much effort into bettering yourself and socialising, you might just meet one of those rare girls who aren't bitches & wh**res.
True, there are a lot of them out there but there's a hell of a lot more on the internet. So get off the internet, get out there, experience it, then maybe you wont have to waste hours on pointless "research" in order to justify to yourself why your girlfriend left you for another guy or why you can't get laid and no female will give you a second glance.
Protip: it's probably your fault.

Bitches and wh**res, How do those work?

OP is captain obvious.
What I find most intriguing is that these skanks showed their tits or masturbated on cam for a f**king looping vid. God damn, that is f**king rich!
Lets try the experiment when it's a really hot girl? Hmm?
Men are even bigger bitches and wh**res, I think you'll find. :)

And you. Using smiley faces on web?
girlslaughing.jpg

These findings are consistent through out every single nationality, with the largest representation being USA. On the topic of BITCHES AND WH**RES: when the female subject is posed with the question "boyfriend?" using loop5 (highest on the scale), 21% responded stating "yes". When the female subject is posed with the question "boyfriend?" using loop3 (median on the scale), 86% responded stating "yes". In instances where same sample drawn twice under loop5 (highest on the scale) and loop3 (median on the scale), the chance of conflicting answers to "boyfriend?" is 79%. What does this mean, exactly? Well if you are as hot as my guido friend here, women are more likely to lie to make themselves available to you than if you were an average bodied individual. Sort of makes you question the foundation of your relationsh*ts, doesn't it? Bitches and wh**res.
portuguese.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=W0CIJF5Z

That is seriously something that could just as well be a well funded research, the whole lieing about being single thing. I generally ignore misogny threads but that is honestly interesting.

female here, do not give sh*t, please post more pics


I agree with you, however, my point was that females emphasize the fact that looks don't mean much to them, even though that is counter to the facts we are being shown. Thus women are manipulative liars who should actually be up front about their physical desires.

Fair enough, many aren't honest. But this whole experiment has a strong selection bias against women who would truly not care so much about looks. Women looking for webcam chats are likely the type who are looking for hot guys, wouldn't you agree? They are also the type who want to show off their own looks, proving that they're pretty superficial to begin with. But what about women who don't do webcam chats? Maybe more of them care less about looks.

To be fair, not as many are lying as you think. When the hot guy said "boyfriend", most lied, so you got 20% yes.
Then the unattractive guy said "boyfriend", you got 86%, which was (probably) higher than the actual because they interpreted him as "creepy". So say 50% of them have boyfriends, so 30% are lying bitches and wh**res.

>people being attracted to other people on a physical basis alone
Are you honestly implying men don't do this? When will you test that theory, exactly? I look forward to your exploration of the "Fa**ots and Douches" phenomenon.


Fair enough, many aren't honest. But this whole experiment has a strong selection bias against women who would truly not care so much about looks. Women looking for webcam chats are likely the type who are looking for hot guys, wouldn't you agree? They are also the type who want to show off their own looks, proving that they're pretty superficial to begin with. But what about women who don't do webcam chats? Maybe more of them care less about looks.

When the selection pool is in the thousands (Chatroulette easily is), and has no bias as to who may enter that pool, you have one of the most accurate samples you can.

Excellent work Dr. But you must conduct more research before we can confirm this theory.
That Russian one was boner-rific


When the selection pool is in the thousands (Chatroulette easily is), and has no bias as to who may enter that pool, you have one of the most accurate samples you can.

But all those people are going to be from the internet and there for a specific reason (to watch people or be watched). Surely this is a study on wh**res on the internet, not wh**res in general?
A couple of women on a cam site can't be representative of all the women out there in real life. I know it's probably as close as OP will get to a real woman but it's hardly the same.

/r/ing video used in the test

To all the fa**ots that say "Nosh*tsherlock":
To you ordinaryf**s, not backing up your statement is an everyday thing. But our esteemed Dr. obviously has some sort of scientific background and thus is inclined to back the statement of "Bitches and Wh**res" up.
Godspeed, Doctor, Godspeed.


But all those people are going to be from the internet and there for a specific reason (to watch people or be watched). Surely this is a study on wh**res on the internet, not wh**res in general?
A couple of women on a cam site can't be representative of all the women out there in real life. I know it's probably as close as OP will get to a real woman but it's hardly the same.

I don't know if you've ever been on Chatroulette. Probably 95% of the people on there don't intend to get naked on cam.
Yes, a large amount do, but the evidence is more like planting a full wallet on the sidewalk, and seeing who takes the bait, and who leaves it. The people don't go for a walk intending to steal the wallet, it's just a spur of the moment decision when the opportunity comes.
The women, apparently, are baited with loops of men doing sexual things, varying by attractiveness. The unattractive ones are met with rejection, while the more attractive ones have less instance of rejection, and more instance of convincing someone who otherwise had no intention of exposing themselves, to do so.
I believe where he said he sometimes got the same woman with different loops, and different results happened, mostly canonizes the fact that the initial attraction is the key factor in their behavior towards the person.

HOLD ON
WOMEN ARE MORE LIKELY TO BE TURNED ON BY HOT GUYS
WTF?!


I don't know if you've ever been on Chatroulette. Probably 95% of the people on there don't intend to get naked on cam.
Yes, a large amount do, but the evidence is more like planting a full wallet on the sidewalk, and seeing who takes the bait, and who leaves it. The people don't go for a walk intending to steal the wallet, it's just a spur of the moment decision when the opportunity comes.
The women, apparently, are baited with loops of men doing sexual things, varying by attractiveness. The unattractive ones are met with rejection, while the more attractive ones have less instance of rejection, and more instance of convincing someone who otherwise had no intention of exposing themselves, to do so.
I believe where he said he sometimes got the same woman with different loops, and different results happened, mostly canonizes the fact that the initial attraction is the key factor in their behavior towards the person.

This. There s a difference between just flashing tits and putting them out in 30 seconds without even being asked or still trying to make the guy cum while your mum is in next room.

In case you missed the thread yesterday, I am currently under the process of scientifically proving that women, in general, are indeed Bitches and Wh**res. Some will fail to see the significance of such research, but none the less I intend to thoroughly prove Bitches and Wh**res theory beyond shadow of doubt.
These samples are obtained through random sampling: samples are drawn at random hours over 2 months. During the process of sampling, different loops on scale of 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) of physical attractiveness are used. Loops on the scale of 1 to 5 feature a male subject of similar/same mannerisms and personalities - with the only difference being physical attractiveness. This ensures the samples obtained display a broad range of female responses to varying degree of physical attractiveness. Some videos are blocked/ended abruptly for purposes of anonymity for the female subject.
Canada.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=NT673VMN

I just don't see how wanting to f**k a hot person makes you bad. I mean, I'm a dude. My lady friend is hot. So we want to f**k. Bang. Women can fingerbang themselves to a hot guy if they want to. Mine did just a little while ago. <3

And to the people that say, "It's a group of camwh**res whawhawha" etc.
I say: "You are as strong as your weakest link."

Sure is a lot of butthurt bitches and insecure fa**ots trying to discredit this.


I just don't see how wanting to f**k a hot person makes you bad. I mean, I'm a dude. My lady friend is hot. So we want to f**k. Bang. Women can fingerbang themselves to a hot guy if they want to. Mine did just a little while ago. <3

Oh bro, my condolences. Should dump the wh**re for fapping to other men.


I don't know if you've ever been on Chatroulette. Probably 95% of the people on there don't intend to get naked on cam.
Yes, a large amount do, but the evidence is more like planting a full wallet on the sidewalk, and seeing who takes the bait, and who leaves it. The people don't go for a walk intending to steal the wallet, it's just a spur of the moment decision when the opportunity comes.
The women, apparently, are baited with loops of men doing sexual things, varying by attractiveness. The unattractive ones are met with rejection, while the more attractive ones have less instance of rejection, and more instance of convincing someone who otherwise had no intention of exposing themselves, to do so.
I believe where he said he sometimes got the same woman with different loops, and different results happened, mostly canonizes the fact that the initial attraction is the key factor in their behavior towards the person.

>Probably 95% of the people on there don't intend to get naked on cam.
bullsh*t


I just don't see how wanting to f**k a hot person makes you bad. I mean, I'm a dude. My lady friend is hot. So we want to f**k. Bang. Women can fingerbang themselves to a hot guy if they want to. Mine did just a little while ago. <3

That's not the issue at hand, as has been pointed out.
Think of it as Mythbusters. The myth here, being, women enjoy saying that they don't care about looks as much as men/they value personality. WE know it's not true, THEY know it's not true, and now there is a (rather convoluted, but mostly logically sound) study that points towards it being not true.

When posed with the question "u wanna date me?" AFTER the female subject responded with "yes" to "boyfriend?" using loop5 (highest on the scale), 63% responded favorably, with the remaining % stating no interest, "maybes", and other factors that led to no response. Out of those 63% whom responded favorably, 55% followed through "u wanna date me?" by sending a confirmation email to the address of my request.
In comparison: When posed with the question "u wanna date me?" AFTER the female subject responded with "yes" to "boyfriend?" using loop3 (median on the scale), 23% responded favorably, with the remaining % stating no interest, "maybes", and other factors that led to no response. Out of those 23% whom responded favorably, 0% followed through "u wanna date me?" by sending a confirmation email to the address of my request.
spanish.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=3DD4QGQM

>people being attracted to other people on a physical basis alone
Are you honestly implying men don't do this? When will you test that theory, exactly? I look forward to your exploration of the "Fa**ots and Douches" phenomenon.

I think there's plenty of hate for fa**ots and douches. See: Alpha male threads. There just isn't active antagonizing since the ronery half of anonymous isn't trying to sleep with alpha males.

And to the people that say, "It's a group of camwh**res whawhawha" etc.
I say: "You are as strong as your weakest link."

You're still applying biased information to a broad population. Quoting old sayings doesn't change anything about that.

PEOPLE USE THE INTERNET FOR PORN!
OP is retarded.

And to the people that say, "It's a group of camwh**res whawhawha" etc.
I say: "You are as strong as your weakest link."

>judging an entire gender based on the actions of a few sluts
>implying it's the fault of the not-sluts that the other females suck

The aspie is strong in this one.

Is there any url where we can find your work, good doctor? From the previous thread and what will be posted in this one?
Going to bed and thread will surely have 404'd

When posed with the question "u wanna date me?" AFTER the female subject responded with "yes" to "boyfriend?" using loop5 (highest on the scale), 63% responded favorably, with the remaining % stating no interest, "maybes", and other factors that led to no response. Out of those 63% whom responded favorably, 55% followed through "u wanna date me?" by sending a confirmation email to the address of my request.
In comparison: When posed with the question "u wanna date me?" AFTER the female subject responded with "yes" to "boyfriend?" using loop3 (median on the scale), 23% responded favorably, with the remaining % stating no interest, "maybes", and other factors that led to no response. Out of those 23% whom responded favorably, 0% followed through "u wanna date me?" by sending a confirmation email to the address of my request.
spanish.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=3DD4QGQM

This pertains especially to the posters who mentioned that the 'dating preference' of females is different from their 'f**king preference'. Especially due to the fact that the girls were more interested in pursuing the researcher when he presented the most attractive looking loop, compared to being completely uninterested when presented the average male loop.
You can argue that polling chatroulette for this data is biased, but the fact remains that he is receiving replies and interaction from multiple females across a wide pool of potential subjects

you are now reading all of OP's post in comic book guys voice

And to the people that say, "It's a group of camwh**res whawhawha" etc.
I say: "You are as strong as your weakest link."

How fast do you wanna bet a hotchick could get a random guy's c**k out on cam?

Hey, guys for hundreds of years, people thought things fall faster than lighter things because Aristotle said they did. Something may seem obviously true, but you won't have good evidence for unless you do an experiment.

Sample size is too small and the samples don't represent a significant portion of the subject group being studied. This isn't supposed to be a study of only women who use these web chats but of all women, right?


How fast do you wanna bet a hotchick could get a random guy's c**k out on cam?

Hurr durr, of course it will be easy to get that result.
Any vids where OP used a different loop?

Christ these videos are hot, Canada's my favorite.

Is there any url where we can find your work, good doctor? From the previous thread and what will be posted in this one?
Going to bed and thread will surely have 404'd

Is there any url where we can find your work, good doctor? From the previous thread and what will be posted in this one?
Going to bed and thread will surely have 404'd

Is there any url where we can find your work, good doctor? From the previous thread and what will be posted in this one?
Going to bed and thread will surely have 404'd

This. I would like to be able to keep up with the good doctor's work at all times!

So let me get this straight, OP plays recorded material with hot guy flirting or fapping, and ACTUAL girls on chat get naked and/or flirt with "him"? Even the ones with bofriends?
Sorry, just joined in to thread.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
/thread

thought that the moment i saw the OP.
dont try and claim theres anything scientific about this

Sample size is too small and the samples don't represent a significant portion of the subject group being studied. This isn't supposed to be a study of only women who use these web chats but of all women, right?

n>30 its valid

The only thing the OP is going to confirm is that women, like men, are in fact biological organisms

Fundamentally flawed research. But nice fapping material. Go on.


n>30 its valid

No, that means it's normally distributed, retard.

THIS JUST IN! WOMEN LIKE ATTRACTIVE MEN, AND WOMEN WHO GO ON SITES SPECIFICALLY FOR CAMWH**RES ARE INCLINED TO CAMWH**RE.
You're a dumbass OP. I can guarantee that if some hot chick wanted you to get your kit off, you'd be naked in half a second.

okok womenz are wh**res can i has loop now?

I must have more of your findings Dr. Bitches and Wh**res, this is very intriguing.

pretty sure you could get a 1000 times more men to jerk off just to the idea of a women

please proceed

More of this yeeee

Canada is one cute girl. I wouldn't mind doing her

how did you get the male loops? you must have worked hard for them ;) fa**ot

OP is a sad fat ugly virgin LOSER with no life. Put some effort in yourself and maybe you could get a girl. Btw, like 10% of users on chatroulette are guys jerking off so guys are way bigger wh**res.

pretty sure you could get a 1000 times more men to jerk off just to the idea of a women

Silly female, men don't fap to fantasy we fap to visual stuff.

Can i recommend you use a host like multiupload or upload2many so files stay up for longer.

F**k yes! My favorite tripf**! And he has brought me more videos.
Protip: Canada is the hottest one.



This. I would like to be able to keep up with the good doctor's work at all times!

Yeah, any webpage doc?
OP is a sad fat ugly virgin LOSER with no life. Put some effort in yourself and maybe you could get a girl. Btw, like 10% of users on chatroulette are guys jerking off so guys are way bigger wh**res.

u mad?
F**k yes! My favorite tripf**! And he has brought me more videos.
Protip: Canada is the hottest one.

Here here bro!

This is stupid. Women aren't wh**res just because they like hot guys. EVERYONE likes hot guys. Go kill yourself.

Wow this guys is getting chicks naked wet and fingering themselves and he doesn't even know about it. I can't imagine what this a**holes ego would be like if he found out.


Yeah, any webpage doc?

u mad?

Here here bro!

Not mad but this absolute LOSER obviously has the time to work out and put effort in his appearance instead of tricking girls into masturbating online.

Oh god! The females in this thread.....EVERYONE can tell.

The statstical breakdown thus far using loop5 (highest on the scale) are as follows: samples collected using loop5 (highest on the scale), 84% of females encountered respond with curiosity, followed quickly by eagerness and flirtatiousness. Out of those 84% whom respond, 76% continued to show eagerness and responded favorably to commands then moved on to displaying themselves. The % missing from 84% inludes factors such as: disconnection, lack of interest or response, failure to comply with command, and delayed response causing loop command disorder. Average interaction length in this category: 00:13:49.

I got muted for re-uploading images from yesterday. F**k. Anyways today I will be presenting new evidence to satisfy both anon's fapping and intellectual needs.

Donna.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=DCYS1X8Q

I lol'd she continued to cam when her mum is next door


Not mad but this absolute LOSER obviously has the time to work out and put effort in his appearance instead of tricking girls into masturbating online.

Lol, u mad.
madwh**re

In case you missed the thread yesterday, I am currently under the process of scientifically proving that women, in general, are indeed Bitches and Wh**res. Some will fail to see the significance of such research, but none the less I intend to thoroughly prove Bitches and Wh**res theory beyond shadow of doubt.
These samples are obtained through random sampling: samples are drawn at random hours over 2 months. During the process of sampling, different loops on scale of 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) of physical attractiveness are used. Loops on the scale of 1 to 5 feature a male subject of similar/same mannerisms and personalities - with the only difference being physical attractiveness. This ensures the samples obtained display a broad range of female responses to varying degree of physical attractiveness. Some videos are blocked/ended abruptly for purposes of anonymity for the female subject.
Canada.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=NT673VMN

What you have proven is that people like to feel desired, loved, important, adventurous etc. and they often will do stupid things to feel this way--one common thing women do is try to impress men with their sexuality because often in society their sexuality is a woman's "currency" for many familial/socio-economic factors that I won't go into here.
Men, don't generally use their sexuality as currency but men want to feel desired, loved, important etc, just like women do, so they will have their ego massaged (just like women do) but in a different way.
Believe me--if men were treated like commodities in all aspects of life (ie in society, in family etc) and their main value was their sexuality--you would see a lot more men acting a fool on webcam or wherever.
Learn to understand humans better--it's all right there for all of us to see how our families, our society, our cultures twist us into "the finished product". Think people, don't just look at the surface.


What you have proven is that people like to feel desired, loved, important, adventurous etc. and they often will do stupid things to feel this way--one common thing women do is try to impress men with their sexuality because often in society their sexuality is a woman's "currency" for many familial/socio-economic factors that I won't go into here.
Men, don't generally use their sexuality as currency but men want to feel desired, loved, important etc, just like women do, so they will have their ego massaged (just like women do) but in a different way.
Believe me--if men were treated like commodities in all aspects of life (ie in society, in family etc) and their main value was their sexuality--you would see a lot more men acting a fool on webcam or wherever.
Learn to understand humans better--it's all right there for all of us to see how our families, our society, our cultures twist us into "the finished product". Think people, don't just look at the surface.

missed the part about lying and cheating?


What you have proven is that people like to feel desired, loved, important, adventurous etc. and they often will do stupid things to feel this way--one common thing women do is try to impress men with their sexuality because often in society their sexuality is a woman's "currency" for many familial/socio-economic factors that I won't go into here.
Men, don't generally use their sexuality as currency but men want to feel desired, loved, important etc, just like women do, so they will have their ego massaged (just like women do) but in a different way.
Believe me--if men were treated like commodities in all aspects of life (ie in society, in family etc) and their main value was their sexuality--you would see a lot more men acting a fool on webcam or wherever.
Learn to understand humans better--it's all right there for all of us to see how our families, our society, our cultures twist us into "the finished product". Think people, don't just look at the surface.

You just said that women are bitches and wh**res, only phrasing it different.

A MAN WOULD NEVER TAKE IT OFF IF A GIRL STARTED STRIPPING BEFORE HIM
OH WAIT


What you have proven is that people like to feel desired, loved, important, adventurous etc. and they often will do stupid things to feel this way--one common thing women do is try to impress men with their sexuality because often in society their sexuality is a woman's "currency" for many familial/socio-economic factors that I won't go into here.
Men, don't generally use their sexuality as currency but men want to feel desired, loved, important etc, just like women do, so they will have their ego massaged (just like women do) but in a different way.
Believe me--if men were treated like commodities in all aspects of life (ie in society, in family etc) and their main value was their sexuality--you would see a lot more men acting a fool on webcam or wherever.
Learn to understand humans better--it's all right there for all of us to see how our families, our society, our cultures twist us into "the finished product". Think people, don't just look at the surface.

OK what the f**k? There are tons of even average guys who are willing to masturbate on cam for women. The OP just showed women prefer hot guys over average guys. What the f**k is all this "they want to feel loved". HOW are they even acting foolish? They are just masturbating.

This is amazing.
Never before have I been so intrigued by science.


OK what the f**k? There are tons of even average guys who are willing to masturbate on cam for women. The OP just showed women prefer hot guys over average guys. What the f**k is all this "they want to feel loved". HOW are they even acting foolish? They are just masturbating.

I know.
Apparently if a female DARES to even masturbate she is automatically a wh**re. OH NO SHE MASTURBATED WHILE SHE HAD A BOYFRIEND!!!! SOMEONE ELSE COULD SEE HER!!!!!

Just don't forget that all the girls in this experiment are using internet relationship tools a.k.a no aparent consequences at all.
Do not forget that not all woman uses this program, and that not every woman would behave like that in a comunity where realtions would longer more than one click.

This is amazing.
Never before have I been so intrigued by science.

pseudo science at best but great fap material

You spent two months figuring out that girls will take it off for a hot guy.
........sage.


I know.
Apparently if a female DARES to even masturbate she is automatically a wh**re. OH NO SHE MASTURBATED WHILE SHE HAD A BOYFRIEND!!!! SOMEONE ELSE COULD SEE HER!!!!!

so u'd masturbate to random stranger online u just met even if u have a bf? good to know that u are a ho by completely disregarding ur relationship with ur bf

Just don't forget that all the girls in this experiment are using internet relationship tools a.k.a no aparent consequences at all.
Do not forget that not all woman uses this program, and that not every woman would behave like that in a comunity where realtions would longer more than one click.

Behave like what? How is masturbating and cybersex remotely bad in any way whatsoever?

In case you missed the thread yesterday, I am currently under the process of scientifically proving that women, in general, are indeed Bitches and Wh**res. Some will fail to see the significance of such research, but none the less I intend to thoroughly prove Bitches and Wh**res theory beyond shadow of doubt.
These samples are obtained through random sampling: samples are drawn at random hours over 2 months. During the process of sampling, different loops on scale of 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) of physical attractiveness are used. Loops on the scale of 1 to 5 feature a male subject of similar/same mannerisms and personalities - with the only difference being physical attractiveness. This ensures the samples obtained display a broad range of female responses to varying degree of physical attractiveness. Some videos are blocked/ended abruptly for purposes of anonymity for the female subject.
Canada.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=NT673VMN

If I may make a suggestion, Dr. Bitches And Wh**res !!YSruCJOXlem
Would you mind using proper English in your upcoming experiments(if any)? I hate to see you use such barbaric language in the videos. Though I've only watched one so far. It would also be interesting to see if they'll respond with their own proper English.


Behave like what? How is masturbating and cybersex remotely bad in any way whatsoever?

What the f**k? This is scary because it's the same sentiment shared amongst the femnazis in the last thread. The problem is not with masturbating but rather MASTURBATING WITH SOMEONE ELSE when you are in a relationship. Yeah its online, yeah its virtual, but the interactions are "real" nonetheless. Shows how much of a slut you are.


so u'd masturbate to random stranger online u just met even if u have a bf? good to know that u are a ho by completely disregarding ur relationship with ur bf

Of course I would. And dont tell me a guy wouldn't. Pornography is the same f**king thing. OH NO YOU DONT EVEN KNOW HER NAME~ YET YOU ARE MASTURBATING TO HER IMAGE HOW COULD YOU~
Kill yourself. There is trolling and then there is posting girls images online because they dared to masturbate to a hot guy.

I feel so ugly right now. all I get are disconnects.


What the f**k? This is scary because it's the same sentiment shared amongst the femnazis in the last thread. The problem is not with masturbating but rather MASTURBATING WITH SOMEONE ELSE when you are in a relationship. Yeah its online, yeah its virtual, but the interactions are "real" nonetheless. Shows how much of a slut you are.

How is MASTURBATING WITH SOMEONE ELSE remotely bad. I hope you are against all porn ever. She didn't f**k the guy, all she did was look at him.
Lol @ "feminazis". Oh how dare women have sex looks like they must be a bunch of FEMINAZIS.


Behave like what? How is masturbating and cybersex remotely bad in any way whatsoever?

wouldn't it be considered cheating if you had a boyfriend, and you chose to masturbate in front of another guy while he masturbates to you and your both sitting in the same room? even if you don't physically touch each other? that would be considered a-ok?

hey dr
how bout you share that loop so we can see some pu**y ourselves?


How is MASTURBATING WITH SOMEONE ELSE remotely bad. I hope you are against all porn ever. She didn't f**k the guy, all she did was look at him.
Lol @ "feminazis". Oh how dare women have sex looks like they must be a bunch of FEMINAZIS.

>How is MASTURBATING WITH SOMEONE ELSE remotely bad.
>implying you wouldn't be mad if I masturbated with your WIFE


wouldn't it be considered cheating if you had a boyfriend, and you chose to masturbate in front of another guy while he masturbates to you and your both sitting in the same room? even if you don't physically touch each other? that would be considered a-ok?

>you're
>typofixmuteing


wouldn't it be considered cheating if you had a boyfriend, and you chose to masturbate in front of another guy while he masturbates to you and your both sitting in the same room? even if you don't physically touch each other? that would be considered a-ok?

At that point it crosses from cybersex to "mutual masturbation", and in that case its sort of on the borderline.
As far as I see it, cybersex is basically just porn that goes 2 ways. And mutual masturbation falls more into the "strip club" category where its a live show as opposed to just an image on a f**king computer screen.
In this case, all women did was masturbate to an image on a comp screen. I can guarantee every single piece of sh*t guy in this thread, including OP, has done the same thing. Theres not a single thing bad with what they did. Most of them probably didnt even have bfs.


How is MASTURBATING WITH SOMEONE ELSE remotely bad. I hope you are against all porn ever. She didn't f**k the guy, all she did was look at him.
Lol @ "feminazis". Oh how dare women have sex looks like they must be a bunch of FEMINAZIS.


Of course I would. And dont tell me a guy wouldn't. Pornography is the same f**king thing. OH NO YOU DONT EVEN KNOW HER NAME~ YET YOU ARE MASTURBATING TO HER IMAGE HOW COULD YOU~
Kill yourself. There is trolling and then there is posting girls images online because they dared to masturbate to a hot guy.

Oh my god......I hope you die alone, slut.

This is awesome, man


Oh my god......I hope you die alone, slut.

OK if you have ever masturbated to anyones image other than your gfs well then I hope you die alone too.


At that point it crosses from cybersex to "mutual masturbation", and in that case its sort of on the borderline.
As far as I see it, cybersex is basically just porn that goes 2 ways. And mutual masturbation falls more into the "strip club" category where its a live show as opposed to just an image on a f**king computer screen.
In this case, all women did was masturbate to an image on a comp screen. I can guarantee every single piece of sh*t guy in this thread, including OP, has done the same thing. Theres not a single thing bad with what they did. Most of them probably didnt even have bfs.

>I can guarantee every single piece of sh*t guy in this thread, including OP, has done the same thing.
Your wh**reishness is not universal.
I am a ripped homosexual, before you use that revolutionary "ur a fat virgin" insult.


At that point it crosses from cybersex to "mutual masturbation", and in that case its sort of on the borderline.
As far as I see it, cybersex is basically just porn that goes 2 ways. And mutual masturbation falls more into the "strip club" category where its a live show as opposed to just an image on a f**king computer screen.
In this case, all women did was masturbate to an image on a comp screen. I can guarantee every single piece of sh*t guy in this thread, including OP, has done the same thing. Theres not a single thing bad with what they did. Most of them probably didnt even have bfs.

>In this case, all women did was masturbate to an image on a comp screen.
You are wrong. All women in the video caps thus far are INTERACTING with what they presume to be a real person. Do you not see their conversation log, or their facial expressions? So yes this is a case of mutual masturbation and it does cross the line.


OK if you have ever masturbated to anyones image other than your gfs well then I hope you die alone too.

the wh**re is strong in this one can smell your diseased vag from here


>In this case, all women did was masturbate to an image on a comp screen.
You are wrong. All women in the video caps thus far are INTERACTING with what they presume to be a real person. Do you not see their conversation log, or their facial expressions? So yes this is a case of mutual masturbation and it does cross the line.

Except he's NOT a real person and he has no idea who they are, they have ZERO connections to each other IRL. Mutual masturbation requires at least some interaction IRL, even then it is on the borderline along with stuff like strip clubs etc.

>I can guarantee every single piece of sh*t guy in this thread, including OP, has done the same thing.
Your wh**reishness is not universal.
I am a ripped homosexual, before you use that revolutionary "ur a fat virgin" insult.

Oh ok so you've never masturbated to an image of someone other than your SO. Cool.

women are attracted to handsome and/or buff men with personalities. no big surprise


Except he's NOT a real person and he has no idea who they are, they have ZERO connections to each other IRL. Mutual masturbation requires at least some interaction IRL, even then it is on the borderline along with stuff like strip clubs etc.

Oh ok so you've never masturbated to an image of someone other than your SO. Cool.

but as far as the women know he is real and he is interacting with them....


Except he's NOT a real person and he has no idea who they are, they have ZERO connections to each other IRL. Mutual masturbation requires at least some interaction IRL, even then it is on the borderline along with stuff like strip clubs etc.

Oh ok so you've never masturbated to an image of someone other than your SO. Cool.

No, you fat slut.
I've never let anyone watch ME masturbate that wasn't my significant other.
I would probably kill myself if my sex drive demanded something as horrendous as you.

http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=478509


but as far as the women know he is real and he is interacting with them....

Ok and as far as you know, those women you masturbate are "real" too.
The thing is, it doesn't matter if he is "real" or not. He is real obviously, the only difference is that the video is a pre-recording. In any case, he doesn't know them, they don't know him. He is completely remote and removed from their lives, to the point where there is zero risk of emotional or sexual infidelity. They don't give a sh*t about him, he is just a masturbation aid.


Except he's NOT a real person and he has no idea who they are, they have ZERO connections to each other IRL. Mutual masturbation requires at least some interaction IRL, even then it is on the borderline along with stuff like strip clubs etc.

Oh ok so you've never masturbated to an image of someone other than your SO. Cool.

>Except he's NOT a real person and he has no idea who they are
Except your point is irrelevant. Those women have no idea that the loop is a fake and they are behaving as they would with a real person.
>they have ZERO connections to each other IRL.
Did you not see parts where those women are literally jumping out of their seats for the guy? It is pretty obvious that there IS some connection. And did you not read the part about cheating and lying? Some of these ladies are ready to date the guy IRL. So yeah I'd say again this crosses the line.
>Mutual masturbation requires at least some interaction IRL, even then it is on the borderline along with stuff like strip clubs etc.
No it doesn't. Case and point look at the videos.


No, you fat slut.
I've never let anyone watch ME masturbate that wasn't my significant other.
I would probably kill myself if my sex drive demanded something as horrendous as you.

So you don't let anyone other than your SO see you naked? Well thats fine I guess maybe you are shy or w/e.
But its not cheating just to get naked in front of a camera. They didn't know they were being taped and put up on web.


Except he's NOT a real person and he has no idea who they are, they have ZERO connections to each other IRL. Mutual masturbation requires at least some interaction IRL, even then it is on the borderline along with stuff like strip clubs etc.

Oh ok so you've never masturbated to an image of someone other than your SO. Cool.

The females are not aware of this. The females believe that the image they are masturbating to is a very attractive male who is simultaneously masturbating to them. They believe he is the conversation partner, thus they are, IN THEIR OWN MINDS, interacting with a male with the intent of mutual sexual gratification. They believe something that isn't true but that doesn't change the fact that they are acting in a certain manner due to their perceptions.

Is there any point to arguing about whether or not masturbating with a stranger while you have a SO is bad? It is not as though you will come to an agreement. What you should do is understand what that means - namely that men think cheating is bad, and women don't.


So you don't let anyone other than your SO see you naked? Well thats fine I guess maybe you are shy or w/e.
But its not cheating just to get naked in front of a camera. They didn't know they were being taped and put up on web.

>you don't let anyone other than your SO see you naked?
I'm gay, not promiscuous.


So you don't let anyone other than your SO see you naked? Well thats fine I guess maybe you are shy or w/e.
But its not cheating just to get naked in front of a camera. They didn't know they were being taped and put up on web.

Shows how much you value your relationships.

God damn.
I only lurk web, but I must express my total dissapointment towards this thread.
Women are attracted to handsome men.
Guess what, guys do the same.
This is retarded.


>you don't let anyone other than your SO see you naked?
I'm gay, not promiscuous.

What does being naked have to do with being promiscuous? If a female posts her tits on a camwh**re thread does that mean she is cheating?

God damn.
I only lurk web, but I must express my total dissapointment towards this thread.
Women are attracted to handsome men.
Guess what, guys do the same.
This is retarded.

Are you sure it's not you who is retarded? If you would actually see what is said in the thread, you would understand that you only have a surface impression of what this thread is about.

God damn.
I only lurk web, but I must express my total dissapointment towards this thread.
Women are attracted to handsome men.
Guess what, guys do the same.
This is retarded.

Read the f**king thread before you call the posters in it stupid.


What does being naked have to do with being promiscuous? If a female posts her tits on a camwh**re thread does that mean she is cheating?

I LIKE HOW YOU ARE STILL JUSTIFYING YOUR SLUTTINESS, SLUT

God damn.
I only lurk web, but I must express my total dissapointment towards this thread.
Women are attracted to handsome men.
Guess what, guys do the same.
This is retarded.

>Women are attracted to handsome men.
>Guess what, guys do the same.
>guys do the same
>guys are attracted to handsome men
:B


What does being naked have to do with being promiscuous? If a female posts her tits on a camwh**re thread does that mean she is cheating?

Depends on the terms of her relationship. Some guys are cool with their girls flashing their tits to the world, some guys aren't.


>Except he's NOT a real person and he has no idea who they are
Except your point is irrelevant. Those women have no idea that the loop is a fake and they are behaving as they would with a real person.
>they have ZERO connections to each other IRL.
Did you not see parts where those women are literally jumping out of their seats for the guy? It is pretty obvious that there IS some connection. And did you not read the part about cheating and lying? Some of these ladies are ready to date the guy IRL. So yeah I'd say again this crosses the line.
>Mutual masturbation requires at least some interaction IRL, even then it is on the borderline along with stuff like strip clubs etc.
No it doesn't. Case and point look at the videos.

Technically, all videos/pictures of people, unless you only masturbate to hentai or whatever, are of "real" people. But there was no "real" interactions that took place while the women were still in relationships. Yeah a small amount WANTED to date him, and followed through BUT they never dated him while being in a relationship with their significant others.
The videos aren't mutual masturbation they are of women just regular masturbating to a vid of a guy masturbating. Even if the guy was live, it would be more like cybersex/camwhoring. Mutual masturbation is IRL only.


What does being naked have to do with being promiscuous? If a female posts her tits on a camwh**re thread does that mean she is cheating?

It is if she is in a serious relationship.
It is utterly throwing in the gutter something that is SUPPOSED to be reserved for people who you think deserve it.
It only really shows how low the wh**res think their self worth is.
A pity.

Well it is somewhat disturbing how fast they seem to take their clothes off and what they say is rather disturbing as well.


Depends on the terms of her relationship. Some guys are cool with their girls flashing their tits to the world, some guys aren't.

Yeah, and since the guys aren't the owners of the tits, what you should say is that some women are comfortable with showing their tits to the world, and some women are not. Obviously these women are. This is not cheating since there is zero sexual or emotional contact there.

Well it is somewhat disturbing how fast they seem to take their clothes off and what they say is rather disturbing as well.

I know, man. I think OP might be a genius.

I`m curious as to how many men responded by fapping


Yeah, and since the guys aren't the owners of the tits, what you should say is that some women are comfortable with showing their tits to the world, and some women are not. Obviously these women are. This is not cheating since there is zero sexual or emotional contact there.

>zero sexual contact
>mutual masturbation online
LOL


Are you sure it's not you who is retarded? If you would actually see what is said in the thread, you would understand that you only have a surface impression of what this thread is about.


Read the f**king thread before you call the posters in it stupid.

I f**king did and I still can't see anything else.
Please enlighten me, good sirs.

Well it is somewhat disturbing how fast they seem to take their clothes off and what they say is rather disturbing as well.

UGGHGHGH WHY IS IT DISTURBING IF THEY TAKE THEIR CLOTHES OFF FAST?
Really disturbing: Rape, murder, etc.
Not disturbing: Wow that girl takes her clothes off fast.
I know a lot of people here like to use misogyny in order to troll females but this thread is such horsesh*t I can't even believe it. I have to believe this whole thread is just one samef**.


Yeah, and since the guys aren't the owners of the tits, what you should say is that some women are comfortable with showing their tits to the world, and some women are not. Obviously these women are. This is not cheating since there is zero sexual or emotional contact there.

You just went full retarded right there, lady.


Yeah, and since the guys aren't the owners of the tits, what you should say is that some women are comfortable with showing their tits to the world, and some women are not. Obviously these women are. This is not cheating since there is zero sexual or emotional contact there.

Why do you act as though "cheating" has some set definition, and further that you are the one who gets to set it?
If men would be uncomfortable with their SO doing that, then that is just the case. And if all women everywhere want to show their tits to a hot guy, regardless of their relationship status, that is also just the case.


Yeah, and since the guys aren't the owners of the tits, what you should say is that some women are comfortable with showing their tits to the world, and some women are not. Obviously these women are. This is not cheating since there is zero sexual or emotional contact there.

I hope I never date someone with the same opinion as you, it would be one crappy relationship.
You don't value yourself or your partner.


UGGHGHGH WHY IS IT DISTURBING IF THEY TAKE THEIR CLOTHES OFF FAST?
Really disturbing: Rape, murder, etc.
Not disturbing: Wow that girl takes her clothes off fast.
I know a lot of people here like to use misogyny in order to troll females but this thread is such horsesh*t I can't even believe it. I have to believe this whole thread is just one samef**.

Took 5mins to get hot donna naked. And she's a pretty decent looking broad and probably wouldn't have given it up IRL in the same amount of time


>zero sexual contact
>mutual masturbation online
LOL

Its not mutual masturbation if they are thousands of miles away from each other. Strip clubs are far worse than what this is.
Lets say the guy is live. In this case, there are two sins here.
-A girl daring to masturbate to a hot guy.
-A girl camwhoring.
Obviously, since the guy is not live, the girl doesn't even count as camwhoring, but she thinks she is camwhoring.
Neither of that is cheating. You are stupid.


UGGHGHGH WHY IS IT DISTURBING IF THEY TAKE THEIR CLOTHES OFF FAST?
Really disturbing: Rape, murder, etc.
Not disturbing: Wow that girl takes her clothes off fast.
I know a lot of people here like to use misogyny in order to troll females but this thread is such horsesh*t I can't even believe it. I have to believe this whole thread is just one samef**.

>WHY IS IT DISTURBING IF THEY TAKE THEIR CLOTHES OFF FAST?
It shows their willingness to quickly throw out their biggest advantage, as dictated by society.


Took 5mins to get hot donna naked. And she's a pretty decent looking broad and probably wouldn't have given it up IRL in the same amount of time

Of course not IRL there is the threat of being raped or getting disease etc. This is basically just masturbation with camwhoring mixed in. How long after seeing a hot vid to you take to get pants off so you can masturbate?


Its not mutual masturbation if they are thousands of miles away from each other. Strip clubs are far worse than what this is.
Lets say the guy is live. In this case, there are two sins here.
-A girl daring to masturbate to a hot guy.
-A girl camwhoring.
Obviously, since the guy is not live, the girl doesn't even count as camwhoring, but she thinks she is camwhoring.
Neither of that is cheating. You are stupid.

you forgot, "the girls were probably drunk, so it's not cheating"


Its not mutual masturbation if they are thousands of miles away from each other. Strip clubs are far worse than what this is.
Lets say the guy is live. In this case, there are two sins here.
-A girl daring to masturbate to a hot guy.
-A girl camwhoring.
Obviously, since the guy is not live, the girl doesn't even count as camwhoring, but she thinks she is camwhoring.
Neither of that is cheating. You are stupid.

>implying a man going to a strip club and getting a lap dance isnt cheating.
Oh women, you and your whorish opinions.


>WHY IS IT DISTURBING IF THEY TAKE THEIR CLOTHES OFF FAST?
It shows their willingness to quickly throw out their biggest advantage, as dictated by society.

Uh, their biggest advantage as dictated by society is never clothes, you retard. Hell considering how much $$$ strippers make I'd say a lack of clothes is a bigger advantage than having clothes.


UGGHGHGH WHY IS IT DISTURBING IF THEY TAKE THEIR CLOTHES OFF FAST?
Really disturbing: Rape, murder, etc.
Not disturbing: Wow that girl takes her clothes off fast.
I know a lot of people here like to use misogyny in order to troll females but this thread is such horsesh*t I can't even believe it. I have to believe this whole thread is just one samef**.

It just seems these girl would take their clothes off immediately upon meeting someone it's disturbing. Then telling the guy you wan to eat his come or some other sh*t.


Its not mutual masturbation if they are thousands of miles away from each other. Strip clubs are far worse than what this is.
Lets say the guy is live. In this case, there are two sins here.
-A girl daring to masturbate to a hot guy.
-A girl camwhoring.
Obviously, since the guy is not live, the girl doesn't even count as camwhoring, but she thinks she is camwhoring.
Neither of that is cheating. You are stupid.

Women logic at work here, gents.


Uh, their biggest advantage as dictated by society is never clothes, you retard. Hell considering how much $$$ strippers make I'd say a lack of clothes is a bigger advantage than having clothes.

are you being serious right now?


Its not mutual masturbation if they are thousands of miles away from each other. Strip clubs are far worse than what this is.
Lets say the guy is live. In this case, there are two sins here.
-A girl daring to masturbate to a hot guy.
-A girl camwhoring.
Obviously, since the guy is not live, the girl doesn't even count as camwhoring, but she thinks she is camwhoring.
Neither of that is cheating. You are stupid.

how is it not mutual masturbation? im masturbating to help you masturbate and vice versa. All in realtime ( at least thats what these girls think), so isn't that technically mutual masturbation? A conversation online is still a conversation, words are being exchanged even if not irl. Why isn't the same thing applied to this cybersex business?


>implying a man going to a strip club and getting a lap dance isnt cheating.
Oh women, you and your whorish opinions.

I think lapdances/mutual masturbation is borderline scenario.
This on the other hand, is just as harmless as porn. If any guy objects to this yet still masturbates to images of hot women he is a bitter nasty hateful hypocrite.


Its not mutual masturbation if they are thousands of miles away from each other. Strip clubs are far worse than what this is.
Lets say the guy is live. In this case, there are two sins here.
-A girl daring to masturbate to a hot guy.
-A girl camwhoring.
Obviously, since the guy is not live, the girl doesn't even count as camwhoring, but she thinks she is camwhoring.
Neither of that is cheating. You are stupid.

HAHA HOLY F**K
I bet you got like a 430 on the Verbal section of the SAT. You can't be this dumb. Okay:
>not mutual masturbation
Both 'participants' are consenting. It is mutual.
>Strip clubs are far worse
You have obviously never been to a strip club. If you touch the strippers or visibly touch yourself, you get thrown out.
>since the guy is not live, the girl doesn't even count as camwhoring
She BELIEVES she is with a live person, so in her mind it is morally acceptable to do it with a live person. Essentially, it doesn't matter what the other end of the video was, she believed that she was with a live male.


how is it not mutual masturbation? im masturbating to help you masturbate and vice versa. All in realtime ( at least thats what these girls think), so isn't that technically mutual masturbation? A conversation online is still a conversation, words are being exchanged even if not irl. Why isn't the same thing applied to this cybersex business?

An IRL hookup implies a personal relationship, plus a much larger temptation to cheat.
He, for all intents and purposes, is nothing but a video of a hot guy. Even if he was LIVE and not a pre-recording, he would still just be a live recording of a hot guy. Who cares.


I think lapdances/mutual masturbation is borderline scenario.
This on the other hand, is just as harmless as porn. If any guy objects to this yet still masturbates to images of hot women he is a bitter nasty hateful hypocrite.

The guys are not, in their minds, actually interacting with the girls in porn. They have never met, in any sense. The fact that this guy isn't actually live, doesn't mean anything.


I think lapdances/mutual masturbation is borderline scenario.
This on the other hand, is just as harmless as porn. If any guy objects to this yet still masturbates to images of hot women he is a bitter nasty hateful hypocrite.

This IS real life in her mind. The fact that you know the male is fake doesnt change the fact that in her mind it is real. Thus your argument is mute.

Didn't that wife divorce her husband because he had sex with a prostitute in Second Life? This is way worse than that.


An IRL hookup implies a personal relationship, plus a much larger temptation to cheat.
He, for all intents and purposes, is nothing but a video of a hot guy. Even if he was LIVE and not a pre-recording, he would still just be a live recording of a hot guy. Who cares.

Im not one of the anons that believe all women are bitches and wh**res. You, however, are a hugee hugeee wh**re. Your mindset sickens me


I think lapdances/mutual masturbation is borderline scenario.
This on the other hand, is just as harmless as porn. If any guy objects to this yet still masturbates to images of hot women he is a bitter nasty hateful hypocrite.

>I think lapdances/mutual masturbation is borderline scenario.
Wow.
What a wh**re, really, I'm not even mad, I'm just baffled at how f**ked up your view of the world is.


I think lapdances/mutual masturbation is borderline scenario.
This on the other hand, is just as harmless as porn. If any guy objects to this yet still masturbates to images of hot women he is a bitter nasty hateful hypocrite.

>This on the other hand, is just as harmless as porn. If any guy objects to this yet still masturbates to images of hot women he is a bitter nasty hateful hypocrite.
wait so if your significant other hops on chatroulette or a camsite to chat with cute girls and masturbate with them you wouldn't have a problem???
As a male I find this highly confusing.


It just seems these girl would take their clothes off immediately upon meeting someone it's disturbing. Then telling the guy you wan to eat his come or some other sh*t.

How is that disturbing they aren't hurting anyone. Are guys that stupid?

are you being serious right now?

A little bit I think I know what that guy is trying to say but I want him to be direct with it instead of going around in circles. He wants to say a womans chastity is her biggest asset (according to himself and other backwards know-nothing misogynist f**ks).


Uh, their biggest advantage as dictated by society is never clothes, you retard. Hell considering how much $$$ strippers make I'd say a lack of clothes is a bigger advantage than having clothes.

I never said it was their biggest advantage was clothes, you illiterate prole.
They are throwing their sexuality out within minutes.

The better looking they are the quicker their clothes come off, have you noticed that. Aim low gents and live the lie you could only dream of.


An IRL hookup implies a personal relationship, plus a much larger temptation to cheat.
He, for all intents and purposes, is nothing but a video of a hot guy. Even if he was LIVE and not a pre-recording, he would still just be a live recording of a hot guy. Who cares.

You are the cause of "Bitches and Wh**res", slut. Way to be a shining example of why such sh*tty thread exist.

OP succeeded amazingly at his task.


How is that disturbing they aren't hurting anyone. Are guys that stupid?

A little bit I think I know what that guy is trying to say but I want him to be direct with it instead of going around in circles. He wants to say a womans chastity is her biggest asset (according to himself and other backwards know-nothing misogynist f**ks).

>a womans chastity is her biggest asset
IT IS.
I DONT LIKE IT. I WISH IT WOULD CHANGE.
BUT IT WONT. GET F**KING REAL.


How is that disturbing they aren't hurting anyone. Are guys that stupid?

A little bit I think I know what that guy is trying to say but I want him to be direct with it instead of going around in circles. He wants to say a womans chastity is her biggest asset (according to himself and other backwards know-nothing misogynist f**ks).

It the same way it would be if a man was following a girl around, hes not hurting anyone but its still disturbing. In the same way that anti social writing is disturbing like that Bjork Stalker.


HAHA HOLY F**K
I bet you got like a 430 on the Verbal section of the SAT. You can't be this dumb. Okay:
>not mutual masturbation
Both 'participants' are consenting. It is mutual.
>Strip clubs are far worse
You have obviously never been to a strip club. If you touch the strippers or visibly touch yourself, you get thrown out.
>since the guy is not live, the girl doesn't even count as camwhoring
She BELIEVES she is with a live person, so in her mind it is morally acceptable to do it with a live person. Essentially, it doesn't matter what the other end of the video was, she believed that she was with a live male.

OK so then she thinks she was camwhoring. Like I said. Camwhoring isn't cheating.

>This on the other hand, is just as harmless as porn. If any guy objects to this yet still masturbates to images of hot women he is a bitter nasty hateful hypocrite.
wait so if your significant other hops on chatroulette or a camsite to chat with cute girls and masturbate with them you wouldn't have a problem???
As a male I find this highly confusing.

No I can't imagine I would care if I caught my bf camwhoring as a matter of fact if he was able to get a lot of girls horny it would make me feel sort of proud that my bf is obviously hotter than whatever they have. I've posted my tits around here too. I don't think its a big deal just to have naked pictures online.


How is that disturbing they aren't hurting anyone. Are guys that stupid?

A little bit I think I know what that guy is trying to say but I want him to be direct with it instead of going around in circles. He wants to say a womans chastity is her biggest asset (according to himself and other backwards know-nothing misogynist f**ks).

>How is that disturbing they aren't hurting anyone. Are guys that stupid?
What the f**k? Did you missed the part where some women masturbated on cam ARE IN A RELATIONSHIP WITH ANOTHER MAN AND IS CONSIDERING CHEATING? What the f**k is wrong with you. Seriously. I think you are just trolling at this point.

A spot where needy wh**res congregate to find attractive men is an ideal location for such studies.
But, still, I fap.


Its not mutual masturbation if they are thousands of miles away from each other. Strip clubs are far worse than what this is.
Lets say the guy is live. In this case, there are two sins here.
-A girl daring to masturbate to a hot guy.
-A girl camwhoring.
Obviously, since the guy is not live, the girl doesn't even count as camwhoring, but she thinks she is camwhoring.
Neither of that is cheating. You are stupid.

It's not cheating if I f**k a dead girls body.

The better looking they are the quicker their clothes come off, have you noticed that. Aim low gents and live the lie you could only dream of.

No sh*t an ugly girl is shyer when it comes to her body and requires more coaxing. How is that not common sense?


OK so then she thinks she was camwhoring. Like I said. Camwhoring isn't cheating.

No I can't imagine I would care if I caught my bf camwhoring as a matter of fact if he was able to get a lot of girls horny it would make me feel sort of proud that my bf is obviously hotter than whatever they have. I've posted my tits around here too. I don't think its a big deal just to have naked pictures online.

>I don't think its a big deal just to have naked pictures online.
This is why you will not succeed in life.


>How is that disturbing they aren't hurting anyone. Are guys that stupid?
What the f**k? Did you missed the part where some women masturbated on cam ARE IN A RELATIONSHIP WITH ANOTHER MAN AND IS CONSIDERING CHEATING? What the f**k is wrong with you. Seriously. I think you are just trolling at this point.

Masturbating isn't cheating. A very very very small amt, less than 1/4th, thought about dating that guy BUT that is not the same thing as cheating ONLY if they continued to string their bfs along. None of them did.
SOME might be cheaters, yes. Maybe at most ~5%.

>I've posted my tits around here too
Wh**re.


It's not cheating if I f**k a dead girls body.

Uh no it isn't cheating its necrophilia and by most peoples books thats way worse than cheating.

This f**king videos are inspiring me to get fit.
Seriously.

>Masturbating isn't cheating.
No, mutual masturbation is cheating. It doesn't f**king matter the distance.
1 yard, 1 cm, 1000km.


Masturbating isn't cheating. A very very very small amt, less than 1/4th, thought about dating that guy BUT that is not the same thing as cheating ONLY if they continued to string their bfs along. None of them did.
SOME might be cheaters, yes. Maybe at most ~5%.

lol wut
this bitch has to be trolling


Masturbating isn't cheating. A very very very small amt, less than 1/4th, thought about dating that guy BUT that is not the same thing as cheating ONLY if they continued to string their bfs along. None of them did.
SOME might be cheaters, yes. Maybe at most ~5%.

Actually its ~34%. But you're a woman and can't do math. Derp derp.


>a womans chastity is her biggest asset
IT IS.
I DONT LIKE IT. I WISH IT WOULD CHANGE.
BUT IT WONT. GET F**KING REAL.

ONLY IF YOU LIVE IN SAUDI ARABIA YOU DUMBASS.
I don't know a single chaste person. People are not chaste, and women are no exception. Even the really really Christian ones masturbate. HOPE THIS HELPS. Kill yourselves.

This f**king videos are inspiring me to get fit.
Seriously.

Me too. I already have a girlfriend, but i'd like to get some hotter girls to mutually masturbate online. Thank goodness thats not cheating, amirite? F**k the wh**re thats been responding in this thread


Actually its ~34%. But you're a woman and can't do math. Derp derp.

What the hell do you even mean? None of the women cheated so you are pulling that # out of your ass.


Masturbating isn't cheating. A very very very small amt, less than 1/4th, thought about dating that guy BUT that is not the same thing as cheating ONLY if they continued to string their bfs along. None of them did.
SOME might be cheaters, yes. Maybe at most ~5%.

HAHAHAHAHAHA so you have to date someone else to be a cheater. So I guess f**king random people is okay.

Dear OP,
I love you. I'm really into webcams right now.
Love,
anon


OK so then she thinks she was camwhoring. Like I said. Camwhoring isn't cheating.

No I can't imagine I would care if I caught my bf camwhoring as a matter of fact if he was able to get a lot of girls horny it would make me feel sort of proud that my bf is obviously hotter than whatever they have. I've posted my tits around here too. I don't think its a big deal just to have naked pictures online.

So it doesn't bother you that your boyfriend enjoys talking to the prettiest girls he can find and jacks off thinking of her while she schlicks thinking of him?
If I understand your reasoning correctly, then the ONLY reason this is acceptable is because it is on the internet?
Because I'm sure if your guy went down to a club and chatted up the prettiest girl he could find and brought her home so they could masturbate to each other masturbating, that you would be a little bit upset.
The only discernible difference between the two scenarios is that one is is done via webcam, the same feelings and emotions are there.


ONLY IF YOU LIVE IN SAUDI ARABIA YOU DUMBASS.
I don't know a single chaste person. People are not chaste, and women are no exception. Even the really really Christian ones masturbate. HOPE THIS HELPS. Kill yourselves.

REALLY? THE BODY OF A WOMAN IS NOT HER MOST IMPORTANT ASSET?
THAT IS WHY CHAD DOUCHEBRO GOES AFTER THE GIRL IN ALL AP CLASSES RIGHT?
RIGHT?!

>Masturbating isn't cheating.
No, mutual masturbation is cheating. It doesn't f**king matter the distance.
1 yard, 1 cm, 1000km.

If you are masturbating to a video of a guy 1000 miles away, how is that any different than porn and camwhoring mixed together?


OK so then she thinks she was camwhoring. Like I said. Camwhoring isn't cheating.

No I can't imagine I would care if I caught my bf camwhoring as a matter of fact if he was able to get a lot of girls horny it would make me feel sort of proud that my bf is obviously hotter than whatever they have. I've posted my tits around here too. I don't think its a big deal just to have naked pictures online.


OK so then she thinks she was camwhoring. Like I said. Camwhoring isn't cheating.

No I can't imagine I would care if I caught my bf camwhoring as a matter of fact if he was able to get a lot of girls horny it would make me feel sort of proud that my bf is obviously hotter than whatever they have. I've posted my tits around here too. I don't think its a big deal just to have naked pictures online.

Post tits so I can masturbate to them.


So it doesn't bother you that your boyfriend enjoys talking to the prettiest girls he can find and jacks off thinking of her while she schlicks thinking of him?
If I understand your reasoning correctly, then the ONLY reason this is acceptable is because it is on the internet?
Because I'm sure if your guy went down to a club and chatted up the prettiest girl he could find and brought her home so they could masturbate to each other masturbating, that you would be a little bit upset.
The only discernible difference between the two scenarios is that one is is done via webcam, the same feelings and emotions are there.

No it isn't because once they meet up IRL they are acquaintances and have that IRL connection.
I cybersex online all the time. Thats basically how I masturbate I can't get off to images alone. It's never effected anything IRL.


REALLY? THE BODY OF A WOMAN IS NOT HER MOST IMPORTANT ASSET?
THAT IS WHY CHAD DOUCHEBRO GOES AFTER THE GIRL IN ALL AP CLASSES RIGHT?
RIGHT?!

Is Chad Douchebro really the guy to be setting our standards by?

hypothesis: supported


No it isn't because once they meet up IRL they are acquaintances and have that IRL connection.
I cybersex online all the time. Thats basically how I masturbate I can't get off to images alone. It's never effected anything IRL.

wanna cyber now


Is Chad Douchebro really the guy to be setting our standards by?

IT ISN'T OUR INDIVIDUAL F**KING RESPONSIBILITY TO SET STANDARDS
THEY ARE ALREADY PRESET
YOU AND YOUR EMPOWERED WOMAN SH*T CANNOT CHANGE THAT
IT FAILED IN THE 1870S THE 70S AND STILL FAILS TODAY


No it isn't because once they meet up IRL they are acquaintances and have that IRL connection.
I cybersex online all the time. Thats basically how I masturbate I can't get off to images alone. It's never effected anything IRL.

The internet is real life, you dumb c**t. It's not like you're dreaming or something. This sh*t is real. I am really writing this, and you are really a c**t.


The internet is real life, you dumb c**t. It's not like you're dreaming or something. This sh*t is real. I am really writing this, and you are really a c**t.

I lold to this pretty hard right now because its so f**king true

this is the greatest thread ever


IT ISN'T OUR INDIVIDUAL F**KING RESPONSIBILITY TO SET STANDARDS
THEY ARE ALREADY PRESET
YOU AND YOUR EMPOWERED WOMAN SH*T CANNOT CHANGE THAT
IT FAILED IN THE 1870S THE 70S AND STILL FAILS TODAY

General standards are just what we convince ourselves of, they're far from preset.
And frankly I find the idea that feminism has changed nothing about how people view sex very amusing.


What the hell do you even mean? None of the women cheated so you are pulling that # out of your ass.

I don't think you understand statistics. But then you wh**re yourself on the internets so its no surprise.

Women are far more vain then men. Most men will give a range of women a chance but bitches always have sh*t served to them on a silver platter and they still reject it. BECAUSE THEY'RE WORTH IT.


The internet is real life, you dumb c**t. It's not like you're dreaming or something. This sh*t is real. I am really writing this, and you are really a c**t.

Im stealing that argument, it was pretty good and simple.

And I won't give you any credit when I use it.


The internet is real life, you dumb c**t. It's not like you're dreaming or something. This sh*t is real. I am really writing this, and you are really a c**t.

The internet is tubes
f**king retard


Im stealing that argument, it was pretty good and simple.

And I won't give you any credit when I use it.

that's fine with me
It's just obvious common sense anyway


The internet is tubes
f**king retard

ARE YOU F**KING RETARDED?
Naw. You aren't. You are troll over lvl9000. Nice job dude.


REALLY? THE BODY OF A WOMAN IS NOT HER MOST IMPORTANT ASSET?
THAT IS WHY CHAD DOUCHEBRO GOES AFTER THE GIRL IN ALL AP CLASSES RIGHT?
RIGHT?!

ARE YOU STUPID? WHAT THE HELL DOES CHAD DOUCHEBRO HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING? AND SHE ISN'T THROWING AWAY HER BODY, EVEN IF IT WAS THE MOST VALUABLE.
Trust me, your ability to f**k and suck Chad Douchebro has nothing to do with your value. Are you stupid? Furthermore, she isn't throwing away her body she is showing it off. If anything she would be INCREASING her value under your retard system.


The internet is real life, you dumb c**t. It's not like you're dreaming or something. This sh*t is real. I am really writing this, and you are really a c**t.

But you don't know me and I don't know you so it is totally different than if someone who I knew IRL called me a c**t.


ARE YOU STUPID? WHAT THE HELL DOES CHAD DOUCHEBRO HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING? AND SHE ISN'T THROWING AWAY HER BODY, EVEN IF IT WAS THE MOST VALUABLE.
Trust me, your ability to f**k and suck Chad Douchebro has nothing to do with your value. Are you stupid? Furthermore, she isn't throwing away her body she is showing it off. If anything she would be INCREASING her value under your retard system.

What the f**k are you talking about. Thread is here |__HERE__|__________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________| YOU ARE HERE_|

Women are far more vain then men. Most men will give a range of women a chance but bitches always have sh*t served to them on a silver platter and they still reject it. BECAUSE THEY'RE WORTH IT.

Yep god forbid women have standards or think they are worth something.


But you don't know me and I don't know you so it is totally different than if someone who I knew IRL called me a c**t.

but it's exactly the same as if I randomly called you a c**t on the street. Just like if you randomly pulled some guy off to the side to masturbate with him
ZOMG NOT CHEATING
You are per se evidence that women are bitches and wh**res. Sorry, OP, you wasted your time. This dumb c**t is all the experiment that was ever needed.


What the f**k are you talking about. Thread is here |__HERE__|__________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________| YOU ARE HERE_|

You claim a woman's most important asset is her body because Chad Douchebro will f**k her. You also claim a woman is throwing away her most important asset, her chastity (?) and this is linked to her body somehow.
But being f**ked by Chad Douchebro is relatively irrelevant. You can get a dick fairly easily either way. You are retarded.


But you don't know me and I don't know you so it is totally different than if someone who I knew IRL called me a c**t.

Shut your dirty wh**re mouth you stupid brainless c**t. God you are such a typical stupid broad.

THE INTERNET IS TUBES

Ah, fearless and just science.


but it's exactly the same as if I randomly called you a c**t on the street. Just like if you randomly pulled some guy off to the side to masturbate with him
ZOMG NOT CHEATING
You are per se evidence that women are bitches and wh**res. Sorry, OP, you wasted your time. This dumb c**t is all the experiment that was ever needed.

Yep and if you randomly pulled a woman off the street, took off all her clothes, and masturbated to her naked body that would be the same as porn online.

Guys, dude actually said "throw out" which is different from "throw away" - unless the president throws away the first pitch on opening day. And he was talking about her body/sex, I think

ITT:
>great fap material
>science of bitches and wh**res
>females sooooooooooooooo mad
great success op

INTERNET IS


Yep and if you randomly pulled a woman off the street, took off all her clothes, and masturbated to her naked body that would be the same as porn online.

no, it wouldn't
It would actually be way different, because there is no interaction between me and the video of the pornstar. And I don't believe there to be any such interaction either, before you go full retard on me.


Yep and if you randomly pulled a woman off the street, took off all her clothes, and masturbated to her naked body that would be the same as porn online.

You are so retarded if you think it is the same thing.

IS TUBES


no, it wouldn't
It would actually be way different, because there is no interaction between me and the video of the pornstar. And I don't believe there to be any such interaction either, before you go full retard on me.

Uhh OK what if you sat in a room with a naked woman and masturbated to her? Or maybe sat around with a naked couple f**king aka vouyerism? Is that the same as internet porn?


no, it wouldn't
It would actually be way different, because there is no interaction between me and the video of the pornstar. And I don't believe there to be any such interaction either, before you go full retard on me.

>no interaction between me and the video of the pornstar.
WE ARE TALKING RIGHT NOW ARE WE NOT. IS TALKING NOT A FORM OF INTERACTION?
IS THE FEMALE IN VID NOT TALKING TO THE OP? IS TALKING NOT A FORM OF INTERACTION?
NEVER MIND THE MASTURBATION PART. I DONT THINK YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT INTERACTION IS.


Uhh OK what if you sat in a room with a naked woman and masturbated to her? Or maybe sat around with a naked couple f**king aka vouyerism? Is that the same as internet porn?

obviously those aren't the same as internet porn, but what does that have to do with mutually masturbating with somebody?

SERIES OF TUBES

IS TUBES

Stop it, you're getting that song stuck in my head.


>no interaction between me and the video of the pornstar.
WE ARE TALKING RIGHT NOW ARE WE NOT. IS TALKING NOT A FORM OF INTERACTION?
IS THE FEMALE IN VID NOT TALKING TO THE OP? IS TALKING NOT A FORM OF INTERACTION?
NEVER MIND THE MASTURBATION PART. I DONT THINK YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT INTERACTION IS.

How is a pornstar talking to me in the porn?
This is f**king retarded. I can be involved in anything this stupid.


You are so retarded if you think it is the same thing.

I DON'T. Because relatively anonymous internet interactions have NOTHING to do with meeting up with someone in real life.
Masturbating to a video of a man thousands of miles away (not cheating) is NOT the same as meeting up with said guy and jacking off with him IRL (borderline). Apparently though I'm just being trolled here so whatever I hope you all choke.

INTERNET SERIES


How is a pornstar talking to me in the porn?
This is f**king retarded. I can be involved in anything this stupid.

I've seen pornstars talk into the camera, not like talking counts as cheating. OH I GUESS IN MICRODICK VIRGIN LAND IT DOES. (only if you are female).

OF TUBES


How is a pornstar talking to me in the porn?
This is f**king retarded. I can be involved in anything this stupid.

DONT GO FULL RETARDED HERE LADY
LOGIC IS LAID OUT THERE FOR YOU


Yep god forbid women have standards or think they are worth something.


Yep god forbid women have standards or think they are worth something.

Apparently they aren't as they just throw their bodies away.


>no interaction between me and the video of the pornstar.
WE ARE TALKING RIGHT NOW ARE WE NOT. IS TALKING NOT A FORM OF INTERACTION?
IS THE FEMALE IN VID NOT TALKING TO THE OP? IS TALKING NOT A FORM OF INTERACTION?
NEVER MIND THE MASTURBATION PART. I DONT THINK YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT INTERACTION IS.

What kind of porn do you watch, lady?


I DON'T. Because relatively anonymous internet interactions have NOTHING to do with meeting up with someone in real life.
Masturbating to a video of a man thousands of miles away (not cheating) is NOT the same as meeting up with said guy and jacking off with him IRL (borderline). Apparently though I'm just being trolled here so whatever I hope you all choke.

Why do you think you're being trolled? Because you're the only one on the internet who holds your retarded opinion?
Ask any couple if they would be okay with this. Just do it, and see what they say.


>no interaction between me and the video of the pornstar.
WE ARE TALKING RIGHT NOW ARE WE NOT. IS TALKING NOT A FORM OF INTERACTION?
IS THE FEMALE IN VID NOT TALKING TO THE OP? IS TALKING NOT A FORM OF INTERACTION?
NEVER MIND THE MASTURBATION PART. I DONT THINK YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT INTERACTION IS.

They aren't interacting IRL though. IRL is totally different than website.
In my two examples (vouyerism and porn) lets say there is zero interaction between the guy and the woman aside from the guy jacking off to her image. Are they the same thing?


I've seen pornstars talk into the camera, not like talking counts as cheating. OH I GUESS IN MICRODICK VIRGIN LAND IT DOES. (only if you are female).

What? they still aren't talking to me. They are talking to the camera. I"m not even there.
no
I said it was too retarded, and I'm sticking with that. Don't talk to me anymore.

OP i questioned your experiment at first, thinking to myself "This proves nothing, women masturbating to hot guys should be nothing new"
Then this c**t comes along

But you don't know me and I don't know you so it is totally different than if someone who I knew IRL called me a c**t.

And shows me that just because sh*t is on the internet she thinks it is okay to act like a wh**re. This is akin to a girl cheating on her boyfriend just because she is in a different country.

THE INTERNET IS A SERIES OF TUBES


They aren't interacting IRL though. IRL is totally different than website.
In my two examples (vouyerism and porn) lets say there is zero interaction between the guy and the woman aside from the guy jacking off to her image. Are they the same thing?

No they aren't because one is in real life, and one is online. In real life shows more intimacy than the cold glow of a computer screen.


Why do you think you're being trolled? Because you're the only one on the internet who holds your retarded opinion?
Ask any couple if they would be okay with this. Just do it, and see what they say.

This. Either you don't know what actually goes on in a relationship (mutual exclusivity) or your definition of relationship is so loose that it isnt a relationship at all.

OP i questioned your experiment at first, thinking to myself "This proves nothing, women masturbating to hot guys should be nothing new"
Then this c**t comes along
And shows me that just because sh*t is on the internet she thinks it is okay to act like a wh**re. This is akin to a girl cheating on her boyfriend just because she is in a different country.

This sh*t was brilliant, and it has gone off brilliantly. Bravo, OP. There is nobody who can doubt now, without willfully closing their eyes to the evidence.


This. Either you don't know what actually goes on in a relationship (mutual exclusivity) or your definition of relationship is so loose that it isnt a relationship at all.

Exactly. F**k this stupid wh**re


No they aren't because one is in real life, and one is online. In real life shows more intimacy than the cold glow of a computer screen.

Yep you got it right. Comparing two people meeting up for masturbation and masturbating to a video of a guy masturbating is just stupid. There is no intimacy or real interpersonal relationship when you are cybersexing.
(I know I am samef**ging here)

Anyway, I'm going to on fitness today. I want to end up like alpha male guido right there. I mean, can't argue with the results.

Anyway, I'm going to on fitness today. I want to end up like alpha male guido right there. I mean, can't argue with the results.

f**k yeah look at donna
didnt even have to start the convo lol

ITT:
>great fap material
>science of bitches and wh**res
>females sooooooooooooooo mad
great success op

Yeah, this is hilarious on several levels and the videos are actually great for fapping. Canada.avi had a great ending, for instance.


Why do you think you're being trolled? Because you're the only one on the internet who holds your retarded opinion?
Ask any couple if they would be okay with this. Just do it, and see what they say.

My retarded opinion is that masturbating and camwhoring are not cheating. Most sane people agree with this. Sorry you have never been laid IRL, so masturbating/camwhoring is probably the height of sexual intimacy for you.


My retarded opinion is that masturbating and camwhoring are not cheating. Most sane people agree with this. Sorry you have never been laid IRL, so masturbating/camwhoring is probably the height of sexual intimacy for you.

Really?
LOL
Jesus f**k you are disconnected from reality.


Yeah, this is hilarious on several levels and the videos are actually great for fapping. Canada.avi had a great ending, for instance.

"how did you get so f**king fit?!??!?!?!|"
"I fell down" F**KING LOLD dont ever change op


"how did you get so f**king fit?!??!?!?!|"
"I fell down" F**KING LOLD dont ever change op

What srsly?
BRB downloadan

This isn't going to show anything really, unless you do the same study but with men instead of women. I can take a guess and say that the women would be less inclined to cheat than the men when it comes to pulling his c**k out and the requests to dating.
So the myth still isn't proved. I still think that women are more inclined to go for personality than men. Might not be MUCH less, but I bet it's less. Until you can make a study of the opposite, this point hasn't been proven.


My retarded opinion is that masturbating and camwhoring are not cheating. Most sane people agree with this. Sorry you have never been laid IRL, so masturbating/camwhoring is probably the height of sexual intimacy for you.

I have been laid IRL, lots of times. And I've been in relationships, and I would never have done something like this to my gfs, and I hope they would never have done something like that to me. Nobody agrees with you. Not one person.
But all you can do is say "hurr durr virgin" because that is apparently the opposite of being an amoral slut who is too selfish to even try to comprehend the feelings of a SO.


What srsly?
BRB downloadan

truth brah, at the very last second before video cuts off

Why is OP trying to prove something that Dr. Dre and his assistant Snoop Dog have already proven?


Really?
LOL
Jesus f**k you are disconnected from reality.

How many women have you dated? I can almost guarantee I'm more experienced than you. Don't give me sh*t about "reality" you basement-dwelling small dick virgin.

Why is OP trying to prove something that Dr. Dre and his assistant Snoop Dog have already proven?

Commercials prove that you need 4 doctors agreeing with this theory and 1 doctor disagreeing so we still need 3 more doctors.


How many women have you dated? I can almost guarantee I'm more experienced than you. Don't give me sh*t about "reality" you basement-dwelling small dick virgin.

what the f**k
stay on topic retarded femnazi


How many women have you dated? I can almost guarantee I'm more experienced than you. Don't give me sh*t about "reality" you basement-dwelling small dick virgin.

>insult
>insult
>insult
I am the ripped gay dude. So your entire post is invalid.


I have been laid IRL, lots of times. And I've been in relationships, and I would never have done something like this to my gfs, and I hope they would never have done something like that to me. Nobody agrees with you. Not one person.
But all you can do is say "hurr durr virgin" because that is apparently the opposite of being an amoral slut who is too selfish to even try to comprehend the feelings of a SO.

Explain to me LOGICALLY what is wrong with masturbating/camwhoring while in a relationship.


How many women have you dated? I can almost guarantee I'm more experienced than you. Don't give me sh*t about "reality" you basement-dwelling small dick virgin.

>I can almost guarantee I'm more experienced than you.
You really aren't doing yourself any favors.


Explain to me LOGICALLY what is wrong with masturbating/camwhoring while in a relationship.

First, learn what the word "logically" means and then you won't ask me such a ridiculous thing.


>insult
>insult
>insult
I am the ripped gay dude. So your entire post is invalid.

Lol like a gay dude can't be a small dick basement dwelling virgin. How many MEN have you dated? I can guarantee I have more experience with reality than you ever will.


How many women have you dated? I can almost guarantee I'm more experienced than you. Don't give me sh*t about "reality" you basement-dwelling small dick virgin.

I don't even want to know how many dicks have been sadly thrown into your chasm of a vagina. This honestly doesn't help to disprove that you aren't a wh**re. Which you are. F**king wh**re.

lol @ butthurt females ITT


Explain to me LOGICALLY what is wrong with masturbating/camwhoring while in a relationship.

OK SERIOUSLY WHAT THE F**K IS WRONG WITH YOU
ARE YOU SO STUPID TO THE POINT THAT THIS ISNT SELF EVIDENT?
HOLY F**K MEGA SLUT DETECTED


Explain to me LOGICALLY what is wrong with masturbating/camwhoring while in a relationship.

What the f**k?
You can't just turn on the logic switch in this whole goddamn argument.
F**k you.


Explain to me LOGICALLY what is wrong with masturbating/camwhoring while in a relationship.

>explain to me '....'
I don't f**kin even. Gl to anyone who takes up this task.


First, learn what the word "logically" means and then you won't ask me such a ridiculous thing.

So far all the answers have been "ITS WRONG BECAUSE IT IS WRONG!!!"
How is it wrong? Don't say because its cheating. Even if we call it cheating, by any measure it does not hurt anyone. Explain to me how such a thing is hurtful.


So far all the answers have been "ITS WRONG BECAUSE IT IS WRONG!!!"
How is it wrong? Don't say because its cheating. Even if we call it cheating, by any measure it does not hurt anyone. Explain to me how such a thing is hurtful.

ok seriously you dont value your partner at all if think camwhoring isnt hurtful to the relationship


So far all the answers have been "ITS WRONG BECAUSE IT IS WRONG!!!"
How is it wrong? Don't say because its cheating. Even if we call it cheating, by any measure it does not hurt anyone. Explain to me how such a thing is hurtful.

What the f**k?
You are questioning morality in an argument concerning morals.
wh**re.


So far all the answers have been "ITS WRONG BECAUSE IT IS WRONG!!!"
How is it wrong? Don't say because its cheating. Even if we call it cheating, by any measure it does not hurt anyone. Explain to me how such a thing is hurtful.

How can you say it doesn't hurt anyone? Obviously there are people who would be hurt to find out that their SO has done this. Apparently, everyone but you would be hurt by this. Of course, you also would be hurt by this, you jsut can't admit it.


ok seriously you dont value your partner at all if think camwhoring isnt hurtful to the relationship

Enlighten me then. How does camwhoring hurt the relationship. Explain a single thing inherently harmful about it.


So far all the answers have been "ITS WRONG BECAUSE IT IS WRONG!!!"
How is it wrong? Don't say because its cheating. Even if we call it cheating, by any measure it does not hurt anyone. Explain to me how such a thing is hurtful.

showing sexual interest in, and then mutually masturbating with, a person* other than your SO is whats wrong...
*(note: people on webcams are PEOPLE, they chat with you, they are interacting with you. Contrasted against porn where the actress is interacting with another actor or the CAMERA, they also portray a personality or character, not themself)


How can you say it doesn't hurt anyone? Obviously there are people who would be hurt to find out that their SO has done this. Apparently, everyone but you would be hurt by this. Of course, you also would be hurt by this, you jsut can't admit it.

People can be hurt by anything and everything. Some stuff, however, is objectively hurtful. If I f**k someone else and give you AIDS, that causes real damage.
Camwhoring is not objectively hurtful. Any pain felt from camwhoring is illogical in nature.


Enlighten me then. How does camwhoring hurt the relationship. Explain a single thing inherently harmful about it.

What do you mean "inherently harmful?"
You are jsut putting qualifiers there, because you can't show it's inherently harmful, jsut as you can't show that having sex with your SO's best friend is "inherently harmful"
You obviously know that, that is why you are using terms like "inherently harmful"


Enlighten me then. How does camwhoring hurt the relationship. Explain a single thing inherently harmful about it.

see

This. Either you don't know what actually goes on in a relationship (mutual exclusivity) or your definition of relationship is so loose that it isnt a relationship at all.

in any case i dont think you have experienced a true relationship beyond opening your lags and have a penis enter you


showing sexual interest in, and then mutually masturbating with, a person* other than your SO is whats wrong...
*(note: people on webcams are PEOPLE, they chat with you, they are interacting with you. Contrasted against porn where the actress is interacting with another actor or the CAMERA, they also portray a personality or character, not themself)

Tell me whats wrong with showing sexual interest in someone not your SO. By masturbating to an image, you are showing some level of sexual interest in her. The only way to be hurt by that would be to be extremely insecure.


People can be hurt by anything and everything. Some stuff, however, is objectively hurtful. If I f**k someone else and give you AIDS, that causes real damage.
Camwhoring is not objectively hurtful. Any pain felt from camwhoring is illogical in nature.

Here it comes:
Cheating on your SO is okay, because "how is it inherently harmful"
Nobody agrees with you on that point, and since intersubjectivity is the best you can hope for in terms of morality, you will find that is what matter. Look, you're a slut who doesn't care. We all already know this. That doesn't mean cheating isn't wrong. It just means you are f**ked up.


What do you mean "inherently harmful?"
You are jsut putting qualifiers there, because you can't show it's inherently harmful, jsut as you can't show that having sex with your SO's best friend is "inherently harmful"
You obviously know that, that is why you are using terms like "inherently harmful"

F**king a BF introduces possibility of disease, of getting pregnant by a BF, etc.
Taking off your shirt on camera does no such thing.


Tell me whats wrong with showing sexual interest in someone not your SO. By masturbating to an image, you are showing some level of sexual interest in her. The only way to be hurt by that would be to be extremely insecure.

look at the retarded corner you are painting yourself into. You already know you have lost this argument. Best just to admit that you are indeed "bitches and wh**res"
this is just pathetic


Tell me whats wrong with showing sexual interest in someone not your SO. By masturbating to an image, you are showing some level of sexual interest in her. The only way to be hurt by that would be to be extremely insecure.

Are you a woman?
Just to be sure. Promise I won't yell bitches and wh**res if you say yes.


F**king a BF introduces possibility of disease, of getting pregnant by a BF, etc.
Taking off your shirt on camera does no such thing.

Not if you are safe about it
Fine, what is so wrong about letting your SO's best friend masturbate in front of you and then cum on your chest? Nothing inherently harmful in that. And no doubt every husband would be okay with it.
You are pathetic right now, and you now it.

Dr. Bitches and Wh**res, you should definitely "publish" this study on the web somewhere permanent.


Here it comes:
Cheating on your SO is okay, because "how is it inherently harmful"
Nobody agrees with you on that point, and since intersubjectivity is the best you can hope for in terms of morality, you will find that is what matter. Look, you're a slut who doesn't care. We all already know this. That doesn't mean cheating isn't wrong. It just means you are f**ked up.

Uh its fine if you want to have extremely subjective and backward morality concerning womens sexuality, but that means no one else has to give a f**k.
And plenty of people agree with me, they stopped by this thread to call you out for being retarded. I'm the only one who is giving you the benefit of the doubt by supposing you are serious and actually trying to understand your broken POV.

This thread has seriously killed my belief that confidence, personality, and not being obese can attract a girl :\\
I just wonder how many years it would take to have a body like Mr. 5? brb /fit/


So far all the answers have been "ITS WRONG BECAUSE IT IS WRONG!!!"
How is it wrong? Don't say because its cheating. Even if we call it cheating, by any measure it does not hurt anyone. Explain to me how such a thing is hurtful.

How would you feel if you found your SO jacking off online to some other camwh**re? F**king wh**re.


Tell me whats wrong with showing sexual interest in someone not your SO. By masturbating to an image, you are showing some level of sexual interest in her. The only way to be hurt by that would be to be extremely insecure.

Well, hmmm, gee. Let's pick a random sample of people who have significant others and ask them how they feel if the other person goes on cam and jerks off to another person at the same time as them. I'm sure you realize this sample would show you how much of an aspie you are. Now, retreat back to your little concrete box of if A then B logic.


Are you a woman?
Just to be sure. Promise I won't yell bitches and wh**res if you say yes.

Yeah I don't care if you yell bitches and wh**res because I know that I am neither.

Not if you are safe about it
Fine, what is so wrong about letting your SO's best friend masturbate in front of you and then cum on your chest? Nothing inherently harmful in that. And no doubt every husband would be okay with it.
You are pathetic right now, and you now it.

That an be an opening for real cheating.


Uh its fine if you want to have extremely subjective and backward morality concerning womens sexuality, but that means no one else has to give a f**k.
And plenty of people agree with me, they stopped by this thread to call you out for being retarded. I'm the only one who is giving you the benefit of the doubt by supposing you are serious and actually trying to understand your broken POV.

no
nobody agrees with you. That is the thing. nobody thinks it's okay to cheat, even if you don't spread a disease.
sorry you are emotionally stunted, but that is your cross to bear, I guess

OP, are you still around? I look forward to hearing more. I love the storm you raise.


Yeah I don't care if you yell bitches and wh**res because I know that I am neither.

That an be an opening for real cheating.

What do you mean, "an opening" and how is "an opening" inherently harmful, huh?
That is the retarded standard you've now been forced to adopt, isn't it? God, you are so pathetic.


Tell me whats wrong with showing sexual interest in someone not your SO. By masturbating to an image, you are showing some level of sexual interest in her. The only way to be hurt by that would be to be extremely insecure.

>By masturbating to an image, you are showing some level of sexual interest in her
but she is not reciprocating specifically to you, which is the case when you are camwhoring. Camwhoring exists because you can get that attention. Porn does not provide that thrill, knowing that someone else is paying attention to YOU at that moment.
This is where your argument is flawed, you do not take into consideration the mutual agreement that is made in a mature, sexual, monogamous, committed relationship. The agreement is that sexual attention is sought from your SO; seeking sexual attention from random strangers, whether IRL or Online, breaches this contract.
At least this is what I am gathering from your strange posting pattern.


How would you feel if you found your SO jacking off online to some other camwh**re? F**king wh**re.

I would not care. I don't see it as any different than porn. He doesn't know her, she doesn't know him, they will never see each other again so who cares.

Well, hmmm, gee. Let's pick a random sample of people who have significant others and ask them how they feel if the other person goes on cam and jerks off to another person at the same time as them. I'm sure you realize this sample would show you how much of an aspie you are. Now, retreat back to your little concrete box of if A then B logic.

Just admit that your judgments on these women are illogical and stupid.


Yeah I don't care if you yell bitches and wh**res because I know that I am neither.

That an be an opening for real cheating.

Ok bitch lets put money where our mouth is. Show pictures of your tits right now with timestamp if you think all this is bullsh*t and we are derp derp full retarded


I would not care. I don't see it as any different than porn. He doesn't know her, she doesn't know him, they will never see each other again so who cares.

Just admit that your judgments on these women are illogical and stupid.

f**king learn what "logical" means and learn when to apply it.


What do you mean, "an opening" and how is "an opening" inherently harmful, huh?
That is the retarded standard you've now been forced to adopt, isn't it? God, you are so pathetic.

Uh, real cheating is inherently harmful, and therefore openings for real cheating tend to be avoided.

>By masturbating to an image, you are showing some level of sexual interest in her
but she is not reciprocating specifically to you, which is the case when you are camwhoring. Camwhoring exists because you can get that attention. Porn does not provide that thrill, knowing that someone else is paying attention to YOU at that moment.
This is where your argument is flawed, you do not take into consideration the mutual agreement that is made in a mature, sexual, monogamous, committed relationship. The agreement is that sexual attention is sought from your SO; seeking sexual attention from random strangers, whether IRL or Online, breaches this contract.
At least this is what I am gathering from your strange posting pattern.

OK so its not cheating if you get sexual gratification from someone else's image, but no one else can get sexual gratification from your image? Sounds like BS to me and a copout in order to control women's bodies.


Uh, real cheating is inherently harmful, and therefore openings for real cheating tend to be avoided.

OK so its not cheating if you get sexual gratification from someone else's image, but no one else can get sexual gratification from your image? Sounds like BS to me and a copout in order to control women's bodies.

but how are openings for real cheating "inherently harmful?"


I would not care. I don't see it as any different than porn. He doesn't know her, she doesn't know him, they will never see each other again so who cares.

Just admit that your judgments on these women are illogical and stupid.

>our judgments on these women are illogical and stupid
>completely ignores the point made
Yup, illogical and stupid.

OP, are you still around? I look forward to hearing more. I love the storm you raise.

I have nothing of significance to add to the conversation at the moment. But here is another video to fuel the raging fire. In this video, you are about to witness yet another BITCHES AND WH**RES in action.
USA5.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=D6WHD9XE


Uh, real cheating is inherently harmful, and therefore openings for real cheating tend to be avoided.

OK so its not cheating if you get sexual gratification from someone else's image, but no one else can get sexual gratification from your image? Sounds like BS to me and a copout in order to control women's bodies.

and I like how letting your husbands best friend jerk off and cum on your chest isn't "real cheating"
you are a f**king joke, lady
Who is the aspie retard, now? You don't understand the first thing about people.


but how are openings for real cheating "inherently harmful?"

Because cheating is inherently harmful. Its like saying "oh kidnapping is inherently harmful, but how is leaving my kid alone (leaving a window open for kidnapping) inherently harmful"? If A leads to B and B is harmful than A is harmful as well.


I have nothing of significance to add to the conversation at the moment. But here is another video to fuel the raging fire. In this video, you are about to witness yet another BITCHES AND WH**RES in action.
USA5.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=D6WHD9XE

>see first frame and he is a guy
>disappointed he didn't get naked and masturbate
>realize something about myself


and I like how letting your husbands best friend jerk off and cum on your chest isn't "real cheating"
you are a f**king joke, lady
Who is the aspie retard, now? You don't understand the first thing about people.

The saddest thing is that you are a virgin who has never even flirted in your life yet you say I don't know a thing about people. Hmph.


Ok bitch lets put money where our mouth is. Show pictures of your tits right now with timestamp if you think all this is bullsh*t and we are derp derp full retarded


Ok bitch lets put money where our mouth is. Show pictures of your tits right now with timestamp if you think all this is bullsh*t and we are derp derp full retarded


Ok bitch lets put money where our mouth is. Show pictures of your tits right now with timestamp if you think all this is bullsh*t and we are derp derp full retarded

HEY CRAZY LADY DO THIS DOOO ITTTTTTTTTT


Because cheating is inherently harmful. Its like saying "oh kidnapping is inherently harmful, but how is leaving my kid alone (leaving a window open for kidnapping) inherently harmful"? If A leads to B and B is harmful than A is harmful as well.

But an opening doesn't necessarily lead to cheating. If that were your logic, then talking to a handsome guy is inherent'y harmful, because it can lead to cheating.

no sound? :(


The saddest thing is that you are a virgin who has never even flirted in your life yet you say I don't know a thing about people. Hmph.

Why do you keep insisting I am a virgin? It is untrue. Is it because you can't defend yourself otherwise?


I have nothing of significance to add to the conversation at the moment. But here is another video to fuel the raging fire. In this video, you are about to witness yet another BITCHES AND WH**RES in action.
USA5.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=D6WHD9XE

Are you typing with them to communicate? Do they notice that your hands aren't even near the keyboard when you type?


Uh, real cheating is inherently harmful, and therefore openings for real cheating tend to be avoided.

OK so its not cheating if you get sexual gratification from someone else's image, but no one else can get sexual gratification from your image? Sounds like BS to me and a copout in order to control women's bodies.

>OK so its not cheating if you get sexual gratification from someone else's image, but no one else can get sexual gratification from your image?
please re-read the post, specifically this part:
>The agreement is that sexual attention is sought from your SO; seeking sexual attention from random strangers, whether IRL or Online, breaches this contract.
Your response doesn't pertain to this statement. I'll make it clearer for your obviously weak female intellect... Please answer this simply:
Is there a difference between getting sexual gratification from someone in real life and getting sexual gratification from someone online? In both instances assume that all actions are in real time and both parties are interested in the opposite parties feelings and emotions.

Oh you guys. Getting a woman to admit they are wrong is like getting a guy to ask for directions - they know it but they'll never admit it. Must admit though this bitch has some THICK ASS SKIN, probably from years of being teased for being a fatass.

And what have we learned, yet again? Bitches and wh**res, women can't be logical, so forth and etc, etc. Please refer to the thread.


But an opening doesn't necessarily lead to cheating. If that were your logic, then talking to a handsome guy is inherent'y harmful, because it can lead to cheating.

Yeah thats the attitude of some extreme cultures you have to make the cut off point on where you trust women....so yeah, usually talking is fine, but for some guys dancing is out. For some guys dancing is fine, but private outings are out.
For 99% of people, being face-to-c**k is just too large of an opening for cheating.
Cybersex and stuff like that the opening for cheating is basically nothing its all anonymous.


>OK so its not cheating if you get sexual gratification from someone else's image, but no one else can get sexual gratification from your image?
please re-read the post, specifically this part:
>The agreement is that sexual attention is sought from your SO; seeking sexual attention from random strangers, whether IRL or Online, breaches this contract.
Your response doesn't pertain to this statement. I'll make it clearer for your obviously weak female intellect... Please answer this simply:
Is there a difference between getting sexual gratification from someone in real life and getting sexual gratification from someone online? In both instances assume that all actions are in real time and both parties are interested in the opposite parties feelings and emotions.

Yes there is. Sexual gratification online has a higher degree of anonymity, and a lower degree of intimacy. Also sexual gratification online almost always boils down to just masturbation anyway.


Yeah thats the attitude of some extreme cultures you have to make the cut off point on where you trust women....so yeah, usually talking is fine, but for some guys dancing is out. For some guys dancing is fine, but private outings are out.
For 99% of people, being face-to-c**k is just too large of an opening for cheating.
Cybersex and stuff like that the opening for cheating is basically nothing its all anonymous.

I'm only giving you the implications of what you said; I don't give a sh*t about other cultures. So, talking to a handsome man = inherently harmful. Mutual masturbating with some guy on the internet and seeking sexual gratification from him = not harmful
okay, you retarded c**t

Oh you guys. Getting a woman to admit they are wrong is like getting a guy to ask for directions - they know it but they'll never admit it. Must admit though this bitch has some THICK ASS SKIN, probably from years of being teased for being a fatass.

lol I like how neckbeard virgins assume every woman who disagrees with them is fat.

Camwhoring and cyber sex isn't cheating. Unless you are a very jealous person. There isn't an emotional connection at all. It's all about getting off. It's harmless. I really wouldn't care if my girlfriend cybers or camwh**res herself. I have more secure than that. Stop being pu**ies.


I have nothing of significance to add to the conversation at the moment. But here is another video to fuel the raging fire. In this video, you are about to witness yet another BITCHES AND WH**RES in action.
USA5.avi
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=D6WHD9XE

Are the videos posted here all the ones you've released?
I've missed previous threads.


Yeah thats the attitude of some extreme cultures you have to make the cut off point on where you trust women....so yeah, usually talking is fine, but for some guys dancing is out. For some guys dancing is fine, but private outings are out.
For 99% of people, being face-to-c**k is just too large of an opening for cheating.
Cybersex and stuff like that the opening for cheating is basically nothing its all anonymous.

SERIOUSLY YOU GOTS TO BE F**KING TROLLING
GOD YOU MAKE MESO F**KING MAD WITH THIS FUILL RETARDEDNESE
BRB BREAKING F**KING KEYBOARD

Oh you guys. Getting a woman to admit they are wrong is like getting a guy to ask for directions - they know it but they'll never admit it. Must admit though this bitch has some THICK ASS SKIN, probably from years of being teased for being a fatass.

But it is so obvious she's wrong. I mean, this is just absurd at this point.
and they wonder why "bitches and wh**res"


lol I like how neckbeard virgins assume every woman who disagrees with them is fat.

ok lady feel free to prove me incorrect
your whole body picture with tits and timestamp
come on you arent a hypocrit are you now?
live your philosphy or shut the f**k up c**t


lol I like how neckbeard virgins assume every woman who disagrees with them is fat.

lol I like how hambeasts assume every man who disagrees with them is a virgin.

Dr tripf**, could you repost/release the posts you made from last thread? Many people weren't around for it, and its not archived.

Dr tripf**, could you repost/release the posts you made from last thread? Many people weren't around for it, and its not archived.

u didnt miss anything all vids are in this thread


ok lady feel free to prove me incorrect
your whole body picture with tits and timestamp
come on you arent a hypocrit are you now?
live your philosphy or shut the f**k up c**t

I never said I post my tits to whatever a**hole virgin creeper asks me to. And my camera isn't even charged so whatever.

100% went back to the kitchen afterward


I never said I post my tits to whatever a**hole virgin creeper asks me to. And my camera isn't even charged so whatever.

>my camera isnt even charged so like wuteva bitch lolololol


I never said I post my tits to whatever a**hole virgin creeper asks me to. And my camera isn't even charged so whatever.

lol you best be trollan
>cellphone pix
>camera pix
>webcam pix
there are more than 1 ways to get your pix online derp derp
you just cant live your own philosphy which means yous trollan


lol you best be trollan
>cellphone pix
>camera pix
>webcam pix
there are more than 1 ways to get your pix online derp derp
you just cant live your own philosphy which means yous trollan

Don't own webcam and cellphone cord thing is lost.
If you want to wait maybe 15-20 mins then maybe. But my philosophy is not, nor has it ever been, "post my tits whenever some hateful a**hole asks".


Don't own webcam and cellphone cord thing is lost.
If you want to wait maybe 15-20 mins then maybe. But my philosophy is not, nor has it ever been, "post my tits whenever some hateful a**hole asks".

>waiting for naked pictures until I die
>you are just trolling the sh*t out of everyone with your stupidity


I never said I post my tits to whatever a**hole virgin creeper asks me to. And my camera isn't even charged so whatever.

WE DEMAND IMAGES OF YOUR POSTERIOR AND MAMMARY GLANDS


Don't own webcam and cellphone cord thing is lost.
If you want to wait maybe 15-20 mins then maybe. But my philosophy is not, nor has it ever been, "post my tits whenever some hateful a**hole asks".

I want to see your pics. Not to contribute to either arguement, but just because i feel like busting a nut. Gimme something sexy


>waiting for naked pictures until I die
>you are just trolling the sh*t out of everyone with your stupidity


WE DEMAND IMAGES OF YOUR POSTERIOR AND MAMMARY GLANDS

Explain to me what the hell it has to do with anything.



Explain to me what the hell it has to do with anything.

You are a mega slut and they want to jerk off to that. Is this really that baffling?



Explain to me what the hell it has to do with anything.

Explain to me that you aren't a bitch or wh**re.
Also, please supply tits.



Explain to me what the hell it has to do with anything.

According to you images both live and stills are meaningless and a woman should be comfortable with openly displaying her sexuality. Okay lady, prove your point by showing some tits and timestamp.

And the thread went from BITCHWH**REBITCHWH**RESLUTF**KYOUWOMENSUCKDIEDIDIEIDDIEIDIDEIDIDIEIEDIEDIE
to TITSORGTFO.
Oh web, you so crazy.


You are a mega slut and they want to jerk off to that. Is this really that baffling?

lol. Why would I post pics to hateful bitter virgins who call me a slut?


lol. Why would I post pics to hateful bitter virgins who call me a slut?

see

According to you images both live and stills are meaningless and a woman should be comfortable with openly displaying her sexuality. Okay lady, prove your point by showing some tits and timestamp.

dont weseal oout now, you arent a PU**Y are you?


lol. Why would I post pics to hateful bitter virgins who call me a slut?

because it is inconsequential. Doesn't harm anyone right? So why NOT post pictures?


lol. Why would I post pics to hateful bitter virgins who call me a slut?

because apparently other guys jerking off to you is the only thing which gives your life meaning


According to you images both live and stills are meaningless and a woman should be comfortable with openly displaying her sexuality. Okay lady, prove your point by showing some tits and timestamp.

Show me a picture of your dick with timestamp next to something for size comparison.

You guys are all f**ked. Cybering isn't cheating. That's just being insecure. It's masturbating. That's it. My girl cybers all the time, sometimes on cam. I do as well. I wouldn't want to be with someone who thinks it's cheating, someone so insecure.


because it is inconsequential. Doesn't harm anyone right? So why NOT post pictures?

No it doesn't harm anyone but why would I go out of my way to show my pics to hateful losers so they can make fun of my tits?

You guys are all f**ked. Cybering isn't cheating. That's just being insecure. It's masturbating. That's it. My girl cybers all the time, sometimes on cam. I do as well. I wouldn't want to be with someone who thinks it's cheating, someone so insecure.

You should read the rest of the thread before you act like you are so secure with your gf, but then chances are you dont really give a f**k about her and your relationship is nothing more than friends with benefits.

You guys are all f**ked. Cybering isn't cheating. That's just being insecure. It's masturbating. That's it. My girl cybers all the time, sometimes on cam. I do as well. I wouldn't want to be with someone who thinks it's cheating, someone so insecure.

yeah, a new person entered an autosaging thread on whatever page this is on.
that is totally what just happened in this post


No it doesn't harm anyone but why would I go out of my way to show my pics to hateful losers so they can make fun of my tits?

see

see
dont weseal oout now, you arent a PU**Y are you?

DO IT DOO IT NAO


You should read the rest of the thread before you act like you are so secure with your gf, but then chances are you dont really give a f**k about her and your relationship is nothing more than friends with benefits.

Oh, I've been reading it for about 10 minutes. You are still being retarded and insecure. I don't care who and in what way my girlfriend talks to anyone as long as it isn't in person.


see
DO IT DOO IT NAO

See

Show me a picture of your dick with timestamp next to something for size comparison.

And plus you have to wait 10-15 mins for camera to charge a bit.


Oh, I've been reading it for about 10 minutes. You are still being retarded and insecure. I don't care who and in what way my girlfriend talks to anyone as long as it isn't in person.

so if she cams with the same guy 4 days a week and tells him how much she wants his hot cum on her face doesn't bother you? having her desire a man that isn't you, having her desire to be covered in another man's cum, these things do not bother you? If she were to fantasize about this other guy who is much better looking and much more her ideal sexual partner and want that to be you, it wouldn't bother you?


See

And plus you have to wait 10-15 mins for camera to charge a bit.

You first crazy lady. I am not the one spewing this crazy philosphy. But hey you are free to prove me incorrect at any time.

girls behave like that when they are in a male strip club IMO.
Its just girls being GIRLY

once this thread came on ive been trying to get girls to cam with me. Seriously this guy must have been at it all day, not just getting the girls to do this but even just coming across one so hot. not once in like 3 hours have i seen more than one hotty

girls behave like that when they are in a male strip club IMO.
Its just girls being GIRLY

Hi you are late to the party. But thanks for confirming what everybody already knows. chicks are bitches and wh**res.


You first crazy lady. I am not the one spewing this crazy philosphy. But hey you are free to prove me incorrect at any time.

You first since you are the one who wants my pics so bad. I'm not going to post my pics and get nothing for free. I need more dicks to add to my dick folder.


You first since you are the one who wants my pics so bad. I'm not going to post my pics and get nothing for free. I need more dicks to add to my dick folder.

You'll get 9000 dicks soon as you post your pic with timestamp.


You first since you are the one who wants my pics so bad. I'm not going to post my pics and get nothing for free. I need more dicks to add to my dick folder.

you will be getting the attention of a bunch of people on anonymous.
Your tits will probably garner more attention than your dim-witted attempts to troll and debate with the men on this board...


You'll get 9000 dicks soon as you post your pic with timestamp.

No I won't I've fallen for this sh*t before show me a pic of your dick next to something for comparison.


No I won't I've fallen for this sh*t before show me a pic of your dick next to something for comparison.

we could do this all day or you could just show yoru tits


No I won't I've fallen for this sh*t before show me a pic of your dick next to something for comparison.

nothing like re-posting that pic that you used when you 'fell for' this last time, I mean its already out there, what harm can be done?


we could do this all day or you could just show yoru tits

I won't unless you give me something first. Aka your dick. Otherwise it isn't fair.


I won't unless you give me something first. Aka your dick. Otherwise it isn't fair.

you'll get all the dicks you can dream of once you provide timestamped images of your breasts

Just got done watching Canada.avi
OP is a genius.


nothing like re-posting that pic that you used when you 'fell for' this last time, I mean its already out there, what harm can be done?

Uh yeah he wants a current timestamp though....
Its not a mole, its a spot on my camera.

you'll get all the dicks you can dream of once you provide timestamped images of your breasts

No, no I won't and you know damn well I won't so shut up.


Uh yeah he wants a current timestamp though....
Its not a mole, its a spot on my camera.

No, no I won't and you know damn well I won't so shut up.

HAW HAW HAW YOU HAVE SMALL MOLDY TITIES


Uh yeah he wants a current timestamp though....
Its not a mole, its a spot on my camera.

No, no I won't and you know damn well I won't so shut up.

gynomastia?


gynomastia?

Ugh no wtf. I had to look that up on wikipedia and one of you guys took his shirt off for the pic. Ugh.


Ugh no wtf. I had to look that up on wikipedia and one of you guys took his shirt off for the pic. Ugh.

how the hell do you not know what gyno is
yous trolling bro


how the hell do you not know what gyno is
yous trolling bro

Because I never knew mantits were a bio condition I just thought it was called being a fatass.


Uh yeah he wants a current timestamp though....
Its not a mole, its a spot on my camera.

No, no I won't and you know damn well I won't so shut up.

I'd hit it based on that pic. How old are you, slut? Also, just how "experienced" are you?


Uh yeah he wants a current timestamp though....
Its not a mole, its a spot on my camera.

No, no I won't and you know damn well I won't so shut up.

MOLE MOLEY MOLE MOLE
I had to get that out of my system even if its not a real mole

I think that "she" was really a guy. Yall niggas got trolled.

I think that "she" was really a guy. Yall niggas got trolled.

If you show me a pic of your dick with timestamp and next to something for comparison I will give you a pic of tits with timestamp.


If you show me a pic of your dick with timestamp and next to something for comparison I will give you a pic of tits with timestamp.

explain to me why you want pictures of penises


explain to me why you want pictures of penises

Because fair is fair. I have sort of a collection going. (Most of them belong to Casanova Frankenstein).


Because fair is fair. I have sort of a collection going. (Most of them belong to Casanova Frankenstein).

cut penises are so ugly


cut penises are so ugly

Really? I prefer cut and so do most females I know we are American though.

>thread about misogny
>ends in 2 chicks talking about dick worship
oh you females so crazy


If you show me a pic of your dick with timestamp and next to something for comparison I will give you a pic of tits with timestamp.

Sure thing, fa**ot. Get AIDS.

I like how anonymous believe any troll who claims to a be a woman just so they can keep their bitches and wh**res.
The fact is the cams first frame is usually on the girls tits so they know exactly what theyre doing.


so if she cams with the same guy 4 days a week and tells him how much she wants his hot cum on her face doesn't bother you? having her desire a man that isn't you, having her desire to be covered in another man's cum, these things do not bother you? If she were to fantasize about this other guy who is much better looking and much more her ideal sexual partner and want that to be you, it wouldn't bother you?

You are reading too much into it. It's called a sexual fantasy. Just because she cybers, it doesn't mean she really wants his cum on her in real life. Just because you cyber with someone, doesn't mean you really want to f**k them. She would never cheat. lol

Do more tests with uglier and uglier men for a control.

so f**king hotttttttttttttttt yeeeeooooooooooo

I love your work Dr. Bitches and Wh**res, Truly groundbreaking research.

so let me get this straight. OP proves females send video of themselves masturbating over the internet to someone they don't know while in a committed relationship, and try to arrange follow-up dates, and all females of anonymous proceed to argue that camwhoring and mutual masturbation with strangers is acceptable in any relationship.
IRREFUTABLE PROOF ALL WOMEN ARE NOTHING BUT BITCHES AND WH**RES

As someone who thoroughly enjoyed the previous thread and was looking forward to the followup, this even better than I could have expected, from the great fap videos to the hilarious rage, trolling and sh*tstorm that developed. This pretty much sums it up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjGfgV7rJHI

So did any girls actually get naked and masturbate to Loop3? I'd like to see some of those, not to mention just how "average" he is.

The part where he does the thank God/sign of the cross slays me every time.

this is the best thread anonymous has had in forever.
seriously, all the bitches and wh**res sh*t on this board has been worth it just because it eventually produced this masterpiece.

The part where he does the thank God/sign of the cross slays me every time.

Yeah but the doctor managed to devise a response for that and the timing is always perfect. He is a genius.

lets f**king sticky this

lets f**king sticky this

It has already been archived. Now we only need a sticky where all of this persons exploits are summoned up or something.

I'm sorry, but for some reason I can't stop laughing each time I watch these vids and the guy does his neck cracking and praying thing.

So weight, if I get muscular, I can basically have sex with any woman I want?

So weight, if I get muscular, I can basically have sex with any woman I want?

You would also need a gimmick like a tattoo or a scar.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/3463442/Facial-scars-can-help-win-a-womans-heart..ht
ml

You know, I actually had this thread hidden because I thought it was another rant typical of anonymous. But it's actually pretty cool OC. I vote archive.


You would also need a gimmick like a tattoo or a scar.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/3463442/Facial-scars-can-help-win-a-womans-heart..ht
ml

BRB CUTTING MYSELF


BRB CUTTING MYSELF

>"Scars that indicate past illness like chickenpox, acne, or surgery scars, and which therefore suggest a weaker immune system, may be viewed more negatively than other types of scarring," says the report.
Cut yourself in such a way that it would appear like you have been in a violent battle.

You know, I actually had this thread hidden because I thought it was another rant typical of anonymous. But it's actually pretty cool OC. I vote archive.

second.jpg
scruffythejanitor

I'd say OP really spun these bitches...
/puts on sunglasses
...for a loop.

This dude looks like captain shephard from mass effect

>cracks neck
>touches nose
>prays to God
This is basically how I wake up in the morning now.

This dude looks like captain shephard from mass effect

Commander Shepard.
And this is his favourite thread on anonymous.

his loop does not always fit with the other person. You could have a "relaxing state" which is just a really long loop where he does not respond much or anything. Then you could have reaction moods and then you could lead it into different state of mind moods.
Cant you ask one of these guys to make these for you? It might make it easier.

his loop does not always fit with the other person. You could have a "relaxing state" which is just a really long loop where he does not respond much or anything. Then you could have reaction moods and then you could lead it into different state of mind moods.
Cant you ask one of these guys to make these for you? It might make it easier.

op is mostly trying to play with the other person so everything fits.

OP has no life. I tried this, and in TWO HOURS I only found five girls. If this guy's done over a hundred samples, he literally spends all day on Chatroulette.

this is pretty f**king funny
mootblocks
can we have a canada stream?


Uh yeah he wants a current timestamp though....
Its not a mole, its a spot on my camera.

No, no I won't and you know damn well I won't so shut up.

Who would make fun of your tits? They're cute.

You know what everyone failed to notice? The guy had an average or slightly above average penis.
Yet the women loved it, and some even commented he was "big."

No comments:

Post a Comment